Community-Based Digital Fabrication Workshops: A Review of the Research Literature.

S. Hielscher, Adrian Smith
{"title":"Community-Based Digital Fabrication Workshops: A Review of the Research Literature.","authors":"S. Hielscher, Adrian Smith","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.2742121","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\"Community-based digital fabrication workshops (such as Hackerspaces, FabLabs and Makerspaces) are innovative spaces where people come together to learn about and use versatile digital design and manufacturing technologies and create things in collaborative projects. Some spaces are run voluntarily, whilst others receive institutional support (e.g. from universities and libraries), but all share an ethos towards providing workshops that can be freely (at least in parts) accessed by the wider public. Workshop members are involved in a variety of practices in these spaces, and that go beyond tinkering with technologies and making things, to include experiments in principled ideas for commons-based peer production that some observers claim might be relevant for a post-consumption society. Nowadays, workshops constitute a global network: they can be found in many major cities around the world; many of them network and share projects and knowledge through social media; and meet up physically at international events. Excited claims are made for community-based digital fabrication workshops. It is argued they address issues of democracy and inclusivity; topics of sustainable production and consumption; and cultivate more creative, skillful and innovative engagements with technology. Such claims appear highly speculative. After all, innovation as an activity involves risks and uncertainty, is destructive as well as creative, and – depending on who appropriates benefits - can exclude certain social interests. Conducting an in-depth literature review on grassroots digital fabrication, this working paper aims to examine existing analytical themes, methodologies and debates addressed by previous research work relevant to community-based digital fabrication workshops. Our review provides reflections on three critical issues: sustainability, inclusivity, and creativity. Conclusively, the paper draws out existing research challenges when examining community-based digital fabrication workshops and future research possibilities in relation to the three critical issues. Future research activity must be attentive to these critical issues confronting grassroots digital fabrication.\"","PeriodicalId":164651,"journal":{"name":"SPRU Working Paper Series","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"49","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SPRU Working Paper Series","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2742121","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 49

Abstract

"Community-based digital fabrication workshops (such as Hackerspaces, FabLabs and Makerspaces) are innovative spaces where people come together to learn about and use versatile digital design and manufacturing technologies and create things in collaborative projects. Some spaces are run voluntarily, whilst others receive institutional support (e.g. from universities and libraries), but all share an ethos towards providing workshops that can be freely (at least in parts) accessed by the wider public. Workshop members are involved in a variety of practices in these spaces, and that go beyond tinkering with technologies and making things, to include experiments in principled ideas for commons-based peer production that some observers claim might be relevant for a post-consumption society. Nowadays, workshops constitute a global network: they can be found in many major cities around the world; many of them network and share projects and knowledge through social media; and meet up physically at international events. Excited claims are made for community-based digital fabrication workshops. It is argued they address issues of democracy and inclusivity; topics of sustainable production and consumption; and cultivate more creative, skillful and innovative engagements with technology. Such claims appear highly speculative. After all, innovation as an activity involves risks and uncertainty, is destructive as well as creative, and – depending on who appropriates benefits - can exclude certain social interests. Conducting an in-depth literature review on grassroots digital fabrication, this working paper aims to examine existing analytical themes, methodologies and debates addressed by previous research work relevant to community-based digital fabrication workshops. Our review provides reflections on three critical issues: sustainability, inclusivity, and creativity. Conclusively, the paper draws out existing research challenges when examining community-based digital fabrication workshops and future research possibilities in relation to the three critical issues. Future research activity must be attentive to these critical issues confronting grassroots digital fabrication."
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
以社区为基础的数位制造工作坊:研究文献回顾。
“以社区为基础的数字制造工作坊(如Hackerspaces、FabLabs和Makerspaces)是创新空间,人们聚集在一起学习和使用多功能数字设计和制造技术,并在合作项目中创造东西。一些空间是自愿经营的,而另一些则得到了机构的支持(例如来自大学和图书馆),但所有这些空间都有一个共同的理念,即提供可以免费(至少部分)向更广泛的公众开放的研讨会。工作坊成员在这些空间中参与了各种各样的实践,这些实践不仅仅是修补技术和制造东西,还包括基于共同基础的同伴生产的原则思想实验,一些观察者认为这可能与后消费社会有关。如今,工作坊构成了一个全球网络:它们可以在世界各地的许多主要城市找到;他们中的许多人通过社交媒体建立网络,分享项目和知识;在国际活动中碰面。以社区为基础的数字制造车间提出了令人兴奋的要求。有人认为,它们解决了民主和包容的问题;可持续生产和消费专题;培养更多的创造性,熟练和创新的技术参与。这种说法似乎具有高度的推测性。毕竟,创新作为一种活动,涉及风险和不确定性,既具有创造性,又具有破坏性,而且——取决于谁获得了利益——可能排除某些社会利益。本工作论文对基层数字制造进行了深入的文献综述,旨在研究与社区数字制造研讨会相关的先前研究工作所涉及的现有分析主题、方法和辩论。我们的评估提供了三个关键问题的思考:可持续性、包容性和创造力。最后,本文在研究基于社区的数字制造研讨会以及与这三个关键问题相关的未来研究可能性时,提出了现有的研究挑战。未来的研究活动必须关注草根数字制造面临的这些关键问题。”
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Serendipity: Towards a Taxonomy and a Theory Research Assessment in the UK and Italy: Costly and Difficult, But Probably Worth (at Least for a While) Do Green Jobs Differ from Non-Green Jobs in Terms of Skills and Human Capital? International Careers of Researchers in Biomedical Sciences: A Comparison of the US and the UK. What is Technology? Six Definitions and Two Pathologies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1