Application of Article 378 of The Criminal Law in The Issuance of Blank Bilyet Giro (Case Study Of Decision Number 291/Pid.B/2014/Pn.Yyk)

Biduan Sianturi, Herman Bakir, Darwati Susilastuti
{"title":"Application of Article 378 of The Criminal Law in The Issuance of Blank Bilyet Giro (Case Study Of Decision Number 291/Pid.B/2014/Pn.Yyk)","authors":"Biduan Sianturi, Herman Bakir, Darwati Susilastuti","doi":"10.4108/eai.6-5-2023.2333504","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":". Bilyet giro is another sort of protection contrasted with different protections by request, is a book move request that capabilities for installment. Notwithstanding, practically speaking, there is, in many cases, a misrepresentation against the billet giro, often known as a void billet giro, bringing about installment disappointments. The plan of the issue in this review is the utilization of Article 378 of the Lawbreaker Code in Choice No. 291/Pid.B/2014/PN. Yyk. is as per the material legitimate arrangements, and what is the reason for the appointed authority's thought in pursuing choices against culprits of criminal demonstrations of extortion that to have the option to demonstrate that the Respondent is shown not at fault for carrying out a crook demonstration of misrepresentation, where there should be components in Article 378 of the Crook Code for the wrongdoing of misrepresentation, parts with the expectation of helping oneself or someone else illegal. While the reason for the appointed authority's thought in pursuing a choice against the culprits of the wrongdoing of extortion in Choice No. 291/Pid.B/2014/PN.Yyk. They expressed that the Litigant was demonstrated to have carried out the go-about as charged to him. However, the demonstration was not a lawbreaker as managed in Article 378 of the Crook Code.","PeriodicalId":319152,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Law, Social Science, Economics, and Education, ICLSSEE 2023, 6 May 2023, Salatiga, Central Java, Indonesia","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Law, Social Science, Economics, and Education, ICLSSEE 2023, 6 May 2023, Salatiga, Central Java, Indonesia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.6-5-2023.2333504","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

. Bilyet giro is another sort of protection contrasted with different protections by request, is a book move request that capabilities for installment. Notwithstanding, practically speaking, there is, in many cases, a misrepresentation against the billet giro, often known as a void billet giro, bringing about installment disappointments. The plan of the issue in this review is the utilization of Article 378 of the Lawbreaker Code in Choice No. 291/Pid.B/2014/PN. Yyk. is as per the material legitimate arrangements, and what is the reason for the appointed authority's thought in pursuing choices against culprits of criminal demonstrations of extortion that to have the option to demonstrate that the Respondent is shown not at fault for carrying out a crook demonstration of misrepresentation, where there should be components in Article 378 of the Crook Code for the wrongdoing of misrepresentation, parts with the expectation of helping oneself or someone else illegal. While the reason for the appointed authority's thought in pursuing a choice against the culprits of the wrongdoing of extortion in Choice No. 291/Pid.B/2014/PN.Yyk. They expressed that the Litigant was demonstrated to have carried out the go-about as charged to him. However, the demonstration was not a lawbreaker as managed in Article 378 of the Crook Code.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
刑法第378条在空白票据签发中的适用(以第291/Pid.B/2014/Pn.Yyk号决定为例)
. 比尔特吉罗是另一种保护,与不同的请求保护相比,是一种图书移动请求,具有安装的能力。尽管如此,实际上,在许多情况下,对钢坯信用证(通常被称为无效钢坯信用证)的陈述有误,导致了对付款的失望。本次审查问题的方案是在第291/Pid.B/2014/PN号选择中运用《违法者法典》第378条。Yyk。是根据实质性的合法安排,以及被指定的当局在对敲诈犯罪证明的罪犯进行选择时的想法是什么,即有权选择证明答辩人在进行虚假陈述的欺诈证明时没有过错,而《欺诈法》第378条中应该有关于虚假陈述的不法行为的组成部分。与帮助自己或他人的期望分开是非法的。在第291/Pid.B/2014/PN.Yyk号选择中,指定当局对敲诈勒索不法行为的罪犯作出选择的原因。他们表示,当事人已被证明进行了对他的指控。但是,这并不是刑法第378条所指的违法行为。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Juridical Review of The Settlement of Lessee Agreements Due To Breach Conducted By Lessee To PT Angkasa Finance The Development of Rahn's Thinking From Nash To Qanun The Role of Intelligence of The Makassar State Attorney in Collecting Data Related To Corruption Literative Analysis Health Insurance For Workers in The Company Legal Protection Of Children In Case Of Physical Violence Causing Serious Injury Perspective Law Number 35 Of 2014 Regarding Amendment To Law Number 23 Of 2002 Concerning Child Protection
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1