Who? Where? What? Examining distributed development in two large open source projects

C. Bird, Nachiappan Nagappan
{"title":"Who? Where? What? Examining distributed development in two large open source projects","authors":"C. Bird, Nachiappan Nagappan","doi":"10.1109/MSR.2012.6224286","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To date, a large body of knowledge has been built up around understanding open source software development. However, there is limited research on examining levels of geographic and organizational distribution within open source software projects, despite many studies examining these same aspects in commercial contexts. We set out to fill this gap in OSS knowledge by manually collecting data for two large, mature, successful projects in an effort to assess how distributed they are, both geographically and organizationally. Both Firefox and Eclipse have been the subject of many studies and are ubiquitous in the areas of software development and internet usage respectively. We identified the top contributors that made 95% of the changes over multiple major releases of Firefox and Eclipse and determined their geographic locations and organizational affiliations. We examine the distribution in each project's constituent subsystems and report the relationship of pre- and post-release defects with distribution levels.","PeriodicalId":383774,"journal":{"name":"2012 9th IEEE Working Conference on Mining Software Repositories (MSR)","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"38","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2012 9th IEEE Working Conference on Mining Software Repositories (MSR)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/MSR.2012.6224286","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 38

Abstract

To date, a large body of knowledge has been built up around understanding open source software development. However, there is limited research on examining levels of geographic and organizational distribution within open source software projects, despite many studies examining these same aspects in commercial contexts. We set out to fill this gap in OSS knowledge by manually collecting data for two large, mature, successful projects in an effort to assess how distributed they are, both geographically and organizationally. Both Firefox and Eclipse have been the subject of many studies and are ubiquitous in the areas of software development and internet usage respectively. We identified the top contributors that made 95% of the changes over multiple major releases of Firefox and Eclipse and determined their geographic locations and organizational affiliations. We examine the distribution in each project's constituent subsystems and report the relationship of pre- and post-release defects with distribution levels.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
谁?在哪里?怎么啦?研究两个大型开源项目中的分布式开发
迄今为止,围绕理解开源软件开发已经建立了大量的知识体系。然而,尽管有许多研究在商业环境中检查了这些相同的方面,但在开源软件项目中检查地理和组织分布级别的研究有限。我们开始通过手动收集两个大型的、成熟的、成功的项目的数据来努力评估它们在地理上和组织上是如何分布的,以此来填补OSS知识中的这一空白。Firefox和Eclipse都是许多研究的主题,并且分别在软件开发和internet使用领域中无处不在。我们确定了在Firefox和Eclipse的多个主要版本中做出95%更改的主要贡献者,并确定了他们的地理位置和组织隶属关系。我们检查每个项目组成子系统中的分布,并报告发布前和发布后缺陷与分布级别的关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
MINCE: Mining change history of Android project Co-evolution of logical couplings and commits for defect estimation Analysis of customer satisfaction survey data Do faster releases improve software quality? An empirical case study of Mozilla Firefox Why do software packages conflict?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1