Who Belongs in the University?

Stephen Schryer
{"title":"Who Belongs in the University?","authors":"Stephen Schryer","doi":"10.11126/STANFORD/9781503603677.003.0007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter focuses on Philip Roth’s late 1990s novel, The Human Stain, arguing that the novel draws an analogy between the university and the Democratic Party. In early War on Poverty–era novels like Portnoy’s Complaint, Roth developed an antiprocess conception of art and welfare politics, one that conceived of works of art and public institutions as products that require audiences to appreciate them on their own terms. In The Human Stain, Roth extends this conception to the postmodern academy, using it to criticize multicultural education and affirmative action. Linking the university and New Deal liberal coalition, Roth insists that both are under assault by cultural and ideological outsiders. This analogy leads Roth to embrace a strategic conservatism, one that echoes the politics of Bill Clinton, whose impeachment trial recurs throughout The Human Stain.","PeriodicalId":166106,"journal":{"name":"Maximum Feasible Participation","volume":"310 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Maximum Feasible Participation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11126/STANFORD/9781503603677.003.0007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This chapter focuses on Philip Roth’s late 1990s novel, The Human Stain, arguing that the novel draws an analogy between the university and the Democratic Party. In early War on Poverty–era novels like Portnoy’s Complaint, Roth developed an antiprocess conception of art and welfare politics, one that conceived of works of art and public institutions as products that require audiences to appreciate them on their own terms. In The Human Stain, Roth extends this conception to the postmodern academy, using it to criticize multicultural education and affirmative action. Linking the university and New Deal liberal coalition, Roth insists that both are under assault by cultural and ideological outsiders. This analogy leads Roth to embrace a strategic conservatism, one that echoes the politics of Bill Clinton, whose impeachment trial recurs throughout The Human Stain.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
谁属于大学?
本章主要关注菲利普·罗斯(Philip Roth)在上世纪90年代末的小说《人性的污点》(The Human Stain),认为这部小说将大学与民主党进行了类比。在《向贫困宣战》(War on poverty)时代的早期小说中,比如波特诺伊的《抱怨》(Complaint),罗斯提出了一种艺术和福利政治的反过程概念,他认为艺术作品和公共机构是需要观众以自己的方式欣赏的产品。在《人性的污点》中,罗斯将这一概念扩展到后现代学院,用它来批判多元文化教育和平权行动。罗斯将大学和新政自由主义联盟联系起来,坚称两者都受到文化和意识形态局外人的攻击。这种类比使罗斯接受了一种战略保守主义,这种保守主义与比尔·克林顿(Bill Clinton)的政治相呼应,他的弹劾审判在《人类的污点》(Human Stain)中反复出现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
5. Civil Rights and the Southern Folk Aesthetic Conclusion. Working-Class Community Action 6. Who Belongs in the University? 3. Legal Services and the Cockroach Revolution 4. Writing Urban Crisis after Moynihan
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1