On Murder Considered as One of the Fine Arts

R. Snyder
{"title":"On Murder Considered as One of the Fine Arts","authors":"R. Snyder","doi":"10.2307/j.ctv13842cg.7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In his 1854 \"Postscript,\" the last of three essays collectively titled \"On murder Considered as One of the Fine Arts,\" Thomas De Quincey uses the iconography of doors and thresholds to explore the dynamics of transgressive violence. Such liminal sites become metonymic analogues for his conception of masculinized agency, specifically in response to what in \"The Household Wreck\" (1838) he calls \"the mighty Juggernaut of social life.\" They also function tropologically to develop his aesthetic of \"dark\" sublimity, as set forth in his well-known reflection, \"On the Knocking at the Gate in Macbeth\" (1823). In dramatizing the murderer John Williams' 1812 invasion of two homes in London's East End, De Quincey concentrates attention on moments of \"suspersion,\" wherein we witness not simply the breaching of conventional boundaries between public and private spheres, but also the blurring of cultural constructions of value associated with them. Williams' depredations thus represent an ambivalent fetishizing of power that is inseparable from De Quincey's apprehensions regarding the \"colossal pace of advance\" in mid-Victorian England. Through its tracing of these tensions as figurative interspaces, the \"Postscript\" can be read as addressing certain symptoms and impasses of modernity, not least the simulacral nature of the \"self.\" ********** Admong the topoi that figure prominently in Thomas De Quincey's iscursive prose as well as his Gothic fiction are doors, gates, and thresholds. Such iconography in the latter genre, of course, should come as no surprise. As numerous studies have shown, these tropes can be construed as boundary markers between \"inner\" and \"outer,\" \"self\" and \"other,\" or \"private\" and \"public,\" often signifying the flexible interstices behind which lurks the Freudian \"Uncanny.\" Hot all scholars, however, have been disposed to read these spatial metaphors as adumbrating some hidden or repressed interiority. In The Coherence of Gothic Conventions, for example, Eve Kosofsky Sedgwick draws attention to how the psychoanalytic model privileges the idea of depth while devaluing that of surface, leaving unexplored the exchanges that occur in terms of contiguity (11-12). (1) Few would deny, I think, that De Quincey's oeuvre is rife with such architectural planes, or what the present essay will describe as liminal interspaces charged with the threat of transgressive violence. In \"On Murder Considered as One of the Fine Arts,\" I shall argue, these sites become metonymic analogues for his conception of masculinized agency, specifically in relation to what in an 1838 Gothic novella titled \"The Household Wreck\" he calls \"the mighty Juggernaut of social life\" (12:159). (2) An appropriate text with which to begin is the familiar reflection \"On the Knocking at the Gate in Macbeth\" (1823), included with several of De Quincey's extended papers on literary theory in David Masson's fourteen-volume edition of The Collected Writings. Anticipating twentieth-century subjective or affective criticism, the piece seeks to account for the Burkean \"awfulness\" and \"solemnity\" in the play immediately after Duncan's murder when Macduff and Lennox arrive at Dunsinane in Act 2. Before offering his explanation of this scene's impact, De Quincey exhorts the reader to ignore the barrier of \"his understanding when it stands in opposition to any other faculty of his mind\" (10:389). He then proceeds to draw a comparison with the perspectival \"laws of vision\": even as two rectilinear walls or juxtaposed houses cannot be apprehended properly \"by a person looking down the street from one extremity,\" so the aesthetic power of the play's interlude cannot be grasped by one who refuses to abandon the \"horizontal line\" of self-distancing (10:390). Ours must instead be, De Quincey goes on to assert, \"a sympathy of comprehension\" that involves imaginative identification with the murderer (10:391). Within these few pages the essay maps a heuristic approach that deploys, almost unconsciously it seems, imagery of encroachment and surveillance, the setting being an ordinary neighborhood like that of Ratcliffe Highway in London's East End where John Williams \"made his debut\" in 1812 and \"executed those unparalleled murders which have procured for him such a brilliant and undying reputation\" (10:390). …","PeriodicalId":210803,"journal":{"name":"Blood and Black Lace","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"32","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Blood and Black Lace","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv13842cg.7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 32

Abstract

In his 1854 "Postscript," the last of three essays collectively titled "On murder Considered as One of the Fine Arts," Thomas De Quincey uses the iconography of doors and thresholds to explore the dynamics of transgressive violence. Such liminal sites become metonymic analogues for his conception of masculinized agency, specifically in response to what in "The Household Wreck" (1838) he calls "the mighty Juggernaut of social life." They also function tropologically to develop his aesthetic of "dark" sublimity, as set forth in his well-known reflection, "On the Knocking at the Gate in Macbeth" (1823). In dramatizing the murderer John Williams' 1812 invasion of two homes in London's East End, De Quincey concentrates attention on moments of "suspersion," wherein we witness not simply the breaching of conventional boundaries between public and private spheres, but also the blurring of cultural constructions of value associated with them. Williams' depredations thus represent an ambivalent fetishizing of power that is inseparable from De Quincey's apprehensions regarding the "colossal pace of advance" in mid-Victorian England. Through its tracing of these tensions as figurative interspaces, the "Postscript" can be read as addressing certain symptoms and impasses of modernity, not least the simulacral nature of the "self." ********** Admong the topoi that figure prominently in Thomas De Quincey's iscursive prose as well as his Gothic fiction are doors, gates, and thresholds. Such iconography in the latter genre, of course, should come as no surprise. As numerous studies have shown, these tropes can be construed as boundary markers between "inner" and "outer," "self" and "other," or "private" and "public," often signifying the flexible interstices behind which lurks the Freudian "Uncanny." Hot all scholars, however, have been disposed to read these spatial metaphors as adumbrating some hidden or repressed interiority. In The Coherence of Gothic Conventions, for example, Eve Kosofsky Sedgwick draws attention to how the psychoanalytic model privileges the idea of depth while devaluing that of surface, leaving unexplored the exchanges that occur in terms of contiguity (11-12). (1) Few would deny, I think, that De Quincey's oeuvre is rife with such architectural planes, or what the present essay will describe as liminal interspaces charged with the threat of transgressive violence. In "On Murder Considered as One of the Fine Arts," I shall argue, these sites become metonymic analogues for his conception of masculinized agency, specifically in relation to what in an 1838 Gothic novella titled "The Household Wreck" he calls "the mighty Juggernaut of social life" (12:159). (2) An appropriate text with which to begin is the familiar reflection "On the Knocking at the Gate in Macbeth" (1823), included with several of De Quincey's extended papers on literary theory in David Masson's fourteen-volume edition of The Collected Writings. Anticipating twentieth-century subjective or affective criticism, the piece seeks to account for the Burkean "awfulness" and "solemnity" in the play immediately after Duncan's murder when Macduff and Lennox arrive at Dunsinane in Act 2. Before offering his explanation of this scene's impact, De Quincey exhorts the reader to ignore the barrier of "his understanding when it stands in opposition to any other faculty of his mind" (10:389). He then proceeds to draw a comparison with the perspectival "laws of vision": even as two rectilinear walls or juxtaposed houses cannot be apprehended properly "by a person looking down the street from one extremity," so the aesthetic power of the play's interlude cannot be grasped by one who refuses to abandon the "horizontal line" of self-distancing (10:390). Ours must instead be, De Quincey goes on to assert, "a sympathy of comprehension" that involves imaginative identification with the murderer (10:391). Within these few pages the essay maps a heuristic approach that deploys, almost unconsciously it seems, imagery of encroachment and surveillance, the setting being an ordinary neighborhood like that of Ratcliffe Highway in London's East End where John Williams "made his debut" in 1812 and "executed those unparalleled murders which have procured for him such a brilliant and undying reputation" (10:390). …
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
凶杀被认为是一门艺术
托马斯·德·昆西(Thomas De Quincey)在他1854年的《后话》(Postscript)中,用门和门槛的图像来探索违法暴力的动态,这是他三篇论文中的最后一篇,总标题为“论谋杀被视为一种艺术”。这样的阈值场所成为他的男性化能动性概念的转喻类比,特别是对他在1838年的《家庭残骸》(The Household Wreck)中所说的“社会生活的强大主宰”的回应。它们还在修辞上发展了他的“黑暗”崇高美学,正如他在著名的反思《在麦克白的门上敲门》(1823)中所阐述的那样。在将1812年杀人犯约翰·威廉姆斯(John Williams)入侵伦敦东区两所住宅的事件戏剧化的过程中,德·昆西将注意力集中在“悬空”时刻,在那里我们不仅目睹了公共领域和私人领域之间传统界限的突破,而且还目睹了与之相关的文化价值建构的模糊。因此,威廉姆斯的掠夺代表了一种对权力的矛盾崇拜,这与德昆西对维多利亚时代中期英国“巨大发展速度”的担忧是分不开的。通过将这些紧张关系作为具象的中间空间进行追溯,《后记》可以被解读为对现代性的某些症状和僵局的探讨,尤其是对“自我”的拟像性的探讨。**********在托马斯·德·昆西的散文诗和他的哥特小说中,最突出的主题是门、大门和门槛。当然,后一种类型的图像设计应该不足为奇。正如许多研究表明的那样,这些比喻可以被解释为“内在”与“外在”、“自我”与“他人”、“私人”与“公共”之间的边界标记,通常意味着隐藏在弗洛伊德式“不可思议”背后的灵活间隙。然而,并非所有学者都倾向于将这些空间隐喻解读为预示着某种隐藏或压抑的内在性。例如,在《哥特惯例的连贯性》一书中,伊芙·科索夫斯基·塞奇威克(Eve Kosofsky Sedgwick)让人们注意到精神分析模型是如何在贬低表面的同时赋予深度的概念以特权的,而没有探索在连续性方面发生的交流(11-12)。(1)我认为,很少有人会否认,德·昆西的作品中充斥着这样的建筑平面,或者是本文将描述为充满违法暴力威胁的有限空间。在《论被视为艺术之一的谋杀》一书中,我认为,这些场所成为了他男性化能动性概念的转喻类比,特别是与他在1838年的一部名为《家庭废墟》的哥特式中篇小说中所说的“社会生活中强大的庞然大物”(12:159)有关。(2)一个合适的文本是我们熟悉的反思《在麦克白的门上敲门》(1823),收录在德昆西关于文学理论的几篇扩展论文中,收录在大卫·马森的十四卷本的《文集》中。预计20世纪的主观或情感批评,这篇文章试图解释伯克式的“可怕”和“庄严”,在邓肯被谋杀后,麦克德夫和伦诺克斯在第二幕到达邓西纳恩。在解释这一幕的影响之前,德昆西劝诫读者不要理会“当他的理解与他的其他思维能力相抵触时”的障碍(10:389)。然后,他继续与透视“视觉法则”进行比较:正如“从街道一端向下看的人”无法正确地理解两面墙或并排的房子一样,一个拒绝放弃自我距离的“水平线”的人也无法理解戏剧幕间休息的美学力量(10:39)。德昆西接着断言,我们的同情必须是“一种理解的同情”,这种同情包括对凶手的想象认同(10:39 . 91)。在这几页里,这篇文章描绘了一种启发式的方法,似乎几乎是无意识地部署了侵犯和监视的图像,背景是一个普通的社区,比如伦敦东区的拉特克利夫高速公路,约翰·威廉姆斯在1812年“首次登台”,“执行了那些无与伦比的谋杀,为他赢得了如此辉煌和不朽的声誉”(10:39)。…
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Celibate Founder Under the Sign of the Giallo The Evil Eye Back Matter Something To Do With Women, Something To Do With Death
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1