DEIXIS AND SPEECH ACT ON PRESIDENTIAL DEBATE BETWEEN DONALD TRUMP AND JOE BIDEN

Doamad Tastier, Oom Rohmah
{"title":"DEIXIS AND SPEECH ACT ON PRESIDENTIAL DEBATE BETWEEN DONALD TRUMP AND JOE BIDEN","authors":"Doamad Tastier, Oom Rohmah","doi":"10.30998/inference.v5i3.12292","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research is to analyze deixis and speech act on presidential debate between Donald Trump and Joe Biden. The research data is the final presidential debate between Donald Trump and Joe Biden on 20th October 2020. The research is qualitative research. Data are taken from the video downloaded from www. Youtube.com. The video is then transcribed and analyzed. The main research instrument is the researcher himself. Deixis found in this research are person deixis (74,88%), spatial deixis (5,55%), temporal deixis (2,19%), social deixis (13,55%), and discourse deixis (3,84%). The context in which deixis used are person deixis in which deictic expression indicates person reference, as first person, second person and third person. Then spatial deixis is in context that deictic expression indicates proximal place and distal place. Temporal deixis in in context in which deictic expression indicates time point. Social deixis is used in context to indicates the social rank of reference. Meanwhile, discourse deixis is used to refer to portion of unfolding discourse in which utterance is located. Speech acts found in the research are assertive (59,54%), directive (11,45%), commissive (16,79%), and expressive (12,21%). The kind of assertive found are informing, convincing, stating, claiming. The kind of directive consist of requesting, suggesting, and ordering. The kind of commissive consist of threatening and promising. The kind of expressive consist of greeting, apologizing, thanking, and surprising. The possible perlocutionary act found is that assertive, which are informing, convincing, and claiming, is Trump and Biden want to inform some facts related to the issues being discussed. Further they want to convince the voters to vote one of them to be next president of the United States of America. Claiming acts is to show about what Trump and Biden have done for America. Each of them claims that he is the better person for the next president. Commissive also is dominant illocutionary acts, particularly promising acts. This is because they are debating for the president.","PeriodicalId":355289,"journal":{"name":"INFERENCE: Journal of English Language Teaching","volume":"223 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"INFERENCE: Journal of English Language Teaching","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30998/inference.v5i3.12292","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This research is to analyze deixis and speech act on presidential debate between Donald Trump and Joe Biden. The research data is the final presidential debate between Donald Trump and Joe Biden on 20th October 2020. The research is qualitative research. Data are taken from the video downloaded from www. Youtube.com. The video is then transcribed and analyzed. The main research instrument is the researcher himself. Deixis found in this research are person deixis (74,88%), spatial deixis (5,55%), temporal deixis (2,19%), social deixis (13,55%), and discourse deixis (3,84%). The context in which deixis used are person deixis in which deictic expression indicates person reference, as first person, second person and third person. Then spatial deixis is in context that deictic expression indicates proximal place and distal place. Temporal deixis in in context in which deictic expression indicates time point. Social deixis is used in context to indicates the social rank of reference. Meanwhile, discourse deixis is used to refer to portion of unfolding discourse in which utterance is located. Speech acts found in the research are assertive (59,54%), directive (11,45%), commissive (16,79%), and expressive (12,21%). The kind of assertive found are informing, convincing, stating, claiming. The kind of directive consist of requesting, suggesting, and ordering. The kind of commissive consist of threatening and promising. The kind of expressive consist of greeting, apologizing, thanking, and surprising. The possible perlocutionary act found is that assertive, which are informing, convincing, and claiming, is Trump and Biden want to inform some facts related to the issues being discussed. Further they want to convince the voters to vote one of them to be next president of the United States of America. Claiming acts is to show about what Trump and Biden have done for America. Each of them claims that he is the better person for the next president. Commissive also is dominant illocutionary acts, particularly promising acts. This is because they are debating for the president.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
指示语和言语在唐纳德·特朗普和乔·拜登的总统辩论中起作用
本研究旨在分析唐纳德·特朗普和乔·拜登总统辩论中的指示语和言语行为。研究数据是2020年10月20日唐纳德·特朗普和乔·拜登之间的最后一场总统辩论。这项研究是定性研究。数据取自从www下载的视频。Youtube.com。然后对视频进行转录和分析。主要的研究工具是研究者本人。本研究发现的指示语有人称指示语(74,88%)、空间指示语(5,55%)、时间指示语(2,19%)、社会指示语(13,55%)和话语指示语(3,84%)。指示语使用的语境是人称指示语,指示语表示人称指称,如第一人称、第二人称和第三人称。空间指示语是在指示语表达近端位置和远端位置的语境中出现的。时间指示语是指指时间点的指示语。社会指示语是在语境中用来表示所指的社会等级的。话语指示语是指话语所在的展开语篇的一部分。研究中发现的言语行为有自信(59,54%)、指示(11,45%)、委托(16,79%)和表达(12,21%)。自信的类型包括告知、说服、陈述和声称。这类指令包括请求、建议和命令。这种委托有威胁和承诺之分。这种表达方式包括问候、道歉、感谢和惊讶。所发现的可能的行为是,自信,即告知,令人信服和声称,是特朗普和拜登想要告知与正在讨论的问题相关的一些事实。此外,他们想说服选民投票给他们中的一个人成为下一任美利坚合众国总统。声称采取行动是为了展示特朗普和拜登为美国做了什么。他们每个人都声称自己是下一任总统的最佳人选。委托也是显性的言外行为,尤其是承诺行为。这是因为他们在为总统辩论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
English For Specific Purposes in SMK – The Ambition Versus Reality The Perceptions of Teachers Regarding Digital Literacy and The English Teaching Learning Process Students’ Perception on Online Learning Media and Self-fficacy during Covid 19 toward English Learning Achievement Analysis of The Implementation of Interdisciplinary Learning in Improving Students’ English Speaking and Writing Skill Representation of Indonesian Millennials in The Presidential Election in The Mass Media (Critical Discourse Analysis Approach to an article in The Jakarta Post)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1