{"title":"The Prevalence, Sources, and Effects of Herding","authors":"Naomi E. Boyd, Bahattin Buyuksahin, Michael S. Haigh, J. Harris","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1359251","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We test the prevalence, sources and effects of herding among large speculative traders in thirty U.S. futures markets over 2004–2009. We find significant herding levels within the large trader category of managed money traders (hedge funds) who are known to have similar performance evaluation measures. Our results support for the notion that greater public information takes away incentives to herd. The number of traders and floor‐based markets are positively associated with herding, while trading volume and electronic trading are negatively related to herding. Notably, we find little evidence that herding by managed money traders serves to destabilize prices in futures markets. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Jrl Fut Mark 36:671–694, 2016","PeriodicalId":369344,"journal":{"name":"American Finance Association Meetings (AFA)","volume":"71 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"25","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Finance Association Meetings (AFA)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1359251","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 25
放牧的流行、来源和影响
本文对2004-2009年美国30个期货市场的大型投机交易者中羊群效应的流行程度、来源和影响进行了测试。我们发现在管理资金交易者(对冲基金)的大型交易者类别中存在显著的羊群效应,这些交易者已知具有类似的绩效评估指标。我们的研究结果支持这样一种观点,即更多的公共信息会减少从众的动机。交易者数量和场内交易市场与羊群效应正相关,而交易量和电子交易与羊群效应负相关。值得注意的是,我们发现几乎没有证据表明受管理的资金交易者的羊群行为会破坏期货市场的价格稳定。©2015 Wiley期刊公司[j] [j], 2016
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。