Iterative Design of Impact-Damping Gloves for Safer Boxing

P. Perkins, A. Jamieson, Geordie Ferguson, W. Spratford, A. Hahn
{"title":"Iterative Design of Impact-Damping Gloves for Safer Boxing","authors":"P. Perkins, A. Jamieson, Geordie Ferguson, W. Spratford, A. Hahn","doi":"10.4236/OJSST.2018.83005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Design methods were employed over a 5-year period to develop boxing gloves capable of substantially buffering impact forces delivered to an opponent, thereby permitting safer boxing. Multiple concepts were explored, with sophistication of prototypes gradually increasing. The protypes underwent both quantitative laboratory testing and qualitative evaluation in the field. The laboratory testing methods were evolved over time to enhance test reliability and ecological validity. Feedback from the laboratory and field trials was highly instrumental in guiding the process of glove development. It was eventually found that, compared to standard boxing gloves, pneumatic gloves with sealed bladders were effective in reducing peak impact forces and peak rates of force development when impact magnitudes were low to moderate but not when they were high. By contrast, pneumatic gloves incorporating a bladder enabling air exchange with the external environment were protective across the entire range of impact magnitudes likely to be encountered in boxing. These gloves are configured differently from standard gloves in terms of the positioning of the fist relative to the glove padding, but now have close visual resemblance to standard gloves. The aesthetics of the gloves have proven critical to their acceptance. Wearer comfort is also vital and, although we extensively pursued the concept of thumbless gloves, we finally deemed it necessary to include separate thumb compartments to accommodate user advice. There is scope for further glove refinement, but recent experience indicates that the latest version is currently sufficient for use in modified boxing programs that emphasise safety, with such targeted contextual sufficiency realising a fundamental aim commonly associated with projects employing the design approach. Small batches of the gloves have recently been manufactured to cater for modified boxing programs.","PeriodicalId":183634,"journal":{"name":"Open Journal of Safety Science and Technology","volume":"54 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Journal of Safety Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4236/OJSST.2018.83005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Design methods were employed over a 5-year period to develop boxing gloves capable of substantially buffering impact forces delivered to an opponent, thereby permitting safer boxing. Multiple concepts were explored, with sophistication of prototypes gradually increasing. The protypes underwent both quantitative laboratory testing and qualitative evaluation in the field. The laboratory testing methods were evolved over time to enhance test reliability and ecological validity. Feedback from the laboratory and field trials was highly instrumental in guiding the process of glove development. It was eventually found that, compared to standard boxing gloves, pneumatic gloves with sealed bladders were effective in reducing peak impact forces and peak rates of force development when impact magnitudes were low to moderate but not when they were high. By contrast, pneumatic gloves incorporating a bladder enabling air exchange with the external environment were protective across the entire range of impact magnitudes likely to be encountered in boxing. These gloves are configured differently from standard gloves in terms of the positioning of the fist relative to the glove padding, but now have close visual resemblance to standard gloves. The aesthetics of the gloves have proven critical to their acceptance. Wearer comfort is also vital and, although we extensively pursued the concept of thumbless gloves, we finally deemed it necessary to include separate thumb compartments to accommodate user advice. There is scope for further glove refinement, but recent experience indicates that the latest version is currently sufficient for use in modified boxing programs that emphasise safety, with such targeted contextual sufficiency realising a fundamental aim commonly associated with projects employing the design approach. Small batches of the gloves have recently been manufactured to cater for modified boxing programs.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
安全拳击冲击阻尼手套的迭代设计
在5年的时间里,设计方法被用于开发拳击手套,该手套能够有效缓冲传递给对手的冲击力,从而允许更安全的拳击。探索了多个概念,原型的复杂程度逐渐增加。原型在现场进行了定量实验室测试和定性评估。随着时间的推移,实验室测试方法不断发展,以提高测试的信度和生态效度。来自实验室和实地试验的反馈在指导手套开发过程中发挥了重要作用。最终发现,与标准拳击手套相比,密封气囊的气动手套在低至中等冲击强度时有效降低峰值冲击力和峰值力发展率,而在高冲击强度时则无效。相比之下,带有气囊的气动手套能够与外部环境进行空气交换,在拳击中可能遇到的整个冲击幅度范围内都具有保护作用。就拳头相对于手套填充物的位置而言,这些手套的配置与标准手套不同,但现在与标准手套具有密切的视觉相似性。事实证明,手套的美学对它们的接受度至关重要。佩戴者的舒适度也是至关重要的,尽管我们广泛追求无拇指手套的概念,但我们最终认为有必要包括单独的拇指区,以适应用户的建议。手套还有进一步改进的空间,但最近的经验表明,最新版本目前足以用于强调安全的改良拳击项目,这种有针对性的上下文充足性实现了通常与采用设计方法的项目相关的基本目标。最近小批量生产的手套,以满足修改拳击项目。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Applying Lean Thinking to Improve Operational Safety in Oil and Gas Industry Study of Farm Vehicle Crashes in Delaware Sensitivity Analysis of Rock-Fill Dam Break Flood on Different Dam Break Durations Farm Vehicle Crashes on U.S. Public Roads: A Review Paper An Examination of Causes of Accidents and Hazards in the Ghanaian Construction Industry
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1