The Relative Efficiency of Public and Private Health Care

T. Tacke, R. Waldmann
{"title":"The Relative Efficiency of Public and Private Health Care","authors":"T. Tacke, R. Waldmann","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1879136","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A health care system is efficient when an increase in spending results in significant improvements in the health of a population. We test the relative efficiency of public and private health care spending in reducing infant and child mortality using cross-national data for 163 countries. There are two remarkable findings: First, an increase in public funds is both, significantly correlated with a lower mortality and significantly more efficient in reducing mortality than private health care expenditure. Second, private health care expenditure is in all estimations associated with higher, not lower, mortality, although this association is often not statistically significant. The results suggest, holding total health care expenditure constant, a potential decrease in total infant mortality in the 163 countries from 6.9 million deaths (2002) to 4.2-5.3 million deaths for completely publicly financed health care systems, but an increase to 9.0-10.0 million deaths for completely privately financed health care. We can explain some of the estimated difference in the efficiency of public and private health care expenditure by geographies and socioeconomic factors such as HIV prevalence, sanitation standards, corruption, and income distribution. However, the efficiency dfference remains large and statistically significant in all regressions.","PeriodicalId":416571,"journal":{"name":"CEIS: Centre for Economic & International Studies Working Paper Series","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CEIS: Centre for Economic & International Studies Working Paper Series","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1879136","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A health care system is efficient when an increase in spending results in significant improvements in the health of a population. We test the relative efficiency of public and private health care spending in reducing infant and child mortality using cross-national data for 163 countries. There are two remarkable findings: First, an increase in public funds is both, significantly correlated with a lower mortality and significantly more efficient in reducing mortality than private health care expenditure. Second, private health care expenditure is in all estimations associated with higher, not lower, mortality, although this association is often not statistically significant. The results suggest, holding total health care expenditure constant, a potential decrease in total infant mortality in the 163 countries from 6.9 million deaths (2002) to 4.2-5.3 million deaths for completely publicly financed health care systems, but an increase to 9.0-10.0 million deaths for completely privately financed health care. We can explain some of the estimated difference in the efficiency of public and private health care expenditure by geographies and socioeconomic factors such as HIV prevalence, sanitation standards, corruption, and income distribution. However, the efficiency dfference remains large and statistically significant in all regressions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
公立和私立医疗保健的相对效率
当支出的增加导致人口健康的显著改善时,卫生保健系统是有效的。我们使用163个国家的跨国数据测试了公共和私人医疗保健支出在降低婴儿和儿童死亡率方面的相对效率。有两个显著的发现:首先,公共资金的增加与较低的死亡率显著相关,而且与私人医疗保健支出相比,在降低死亡率方面效率显著提高。第二,在所有估计中,私人卫生保健支出与更高而不是更低的死亡率相关,尽管这种关联通常在统计上并不显著。结果表明,在保持卫生保健总支出不变的情况下,163个国家的总婴儿死亡率可能会从690万例死亡(2002年)下降到420万至530万例死亡(完全由公共资助的卫生保健系统),但在完全由私人资助的卫生保健系统中,婴儿死亡率会增加到900万至1000万例死亡。我们可以按地域和社会经济因素(如艾滋病毒流行率、卫生标准、腐败和收入分配)来解释公共和私人医疗保健支出效率方面的一些估计差异。然而,在所有回归中,效率差异仍然很大且具有统计学意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Modelling Cycles in Climate Series: The Fractional Sinusoidal Waveform Process Three Liquid Assets Efficient Nonparametric Estimation of Generalized Autocovariances Partnership Dissolution with Cash-Constrained Agents Pre-selection in Cointegration-based Pairs Trading
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1