Self-regulated learning and learning analytics in online learning environments: a review of empirical research

Olga Viberg, Mohammad Khalil, M. Baars
{"title":"Self-regulated learning and learning analytics in online learning environments: a review of empirical research","authors":"Olga Viberg, Mohammad Khalil, M. Baars","doi":"10.1145/3375462.3375483","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Self-regulated learning (SRL) can predict academic performance. Yet, it is difficult for learners. The ability to self-regulate learning becomes even more important in emerging online learning settings. To support learners in developing their SRL, learning analytics (LA), which can improve learning practice by transforming the ways we support learning, is critical. This scoping review is based on the analysis of 54 papers on LA empirical research for SRL in online learning contexts published between 2011 and 2019. The research question is: What is the current state of the applications of learning analytics to measure and support students' SRL in online learning environments? The focus is on SRL phases, methods, forms of SRL support, evidence for LA and types of online learning settings. Zimmerman's model (2002) was used to examine SRL phases. The evidence about LA was examined in relation to four propositions: whether LA i) improve learning outcomes, ii) improve learning support and teaching, iii) are deployed widely, and iv) used ethically. Results showed most studies focused on SRL parts from the forethought and performance phase but much less focus on reflection. We found little evidence for LA that showed i) improvements in learning outcomes (20%), ii) improvements in learning support and teaching (22%). LA was also found iii) not used widely and iv) few studies (15%) approached research ethically. Overall, the findings show LA research was conducted mainly to measure rather than to support SRL. Thus, there is a critical need to exploit the LA support mechanisms further in order to ultimately use them to foster student SRL in online learning environments.","PeriodicalId":355800,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on Learning Analytics & Knowledge","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"82","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on Learning Analytics & Knowledge","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3375462.3375483","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 82

Abstract

Self-regulated learning (SRL) can predict academic performance. Yet, it is difficult for learners. The ability to self-regulate learning becomes even more important in emerging online learning settings. To support learners in developing their SRL, learning analytics (LA), which can improve learning practice by transforming the ways we support learning, is critical. This scoping review is based on the analysis of 54 papers on LA empirical research for SRL in online learning contexts published between 2011 and 2019. The research question is: What is the current state of the applications of learning analytics to measure and support students' SRL in online learning environments? The focus is on SRL phases, methods, forms of SRL support, evidence for LA and types of online learning settings. Zimmerman's model (2002) was used to examine SRL phases. The evidence about LA was examined in relation to four propositions: whether LA i) improve learning outcomes, ii) improve learning support and teaching, iii) are deployed widely, and iv) used ethically. Results showed most studies focused on SRL parts from the forethought and performance phase but much less focus on reflection. We found little evidence for LA that showed i) improvements in learning outcomes (20%), ii) improvements in learning support and teaching (22%). LA was also found iii) not used widely and iv) few studies (15%) approached research ethically. Overall, the findings show LA research was conducted mainly to measure rather than to support SRL. Thus, there is a critical need to exploit the LA support mechanisms further in order to ultimately use them to foster student SRL in online learning environments.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
网络学习环境下的自主学习与学习分析:实证研究综述
自我调节学习(SRL)可以预测学习成绩。然而,这对学习者来说很难。在新兴的在线学习环境中,自我调节学习的能力变得更加重要。为了支持学习者发展他们的SRL,学习分析(LA)是至关重要的,它可以通过改变我们支持学习的方式来改善学习实践。本文基于对2011年至2019年间发表的54篇在线学习背景下SRL的LA实证研究论文的分析。研究的问题是:学习分析在在线学习环境中测量和支持学生SRL的应用现状如何?重点是SRL阶段、方法、SRL支持的形式、LA的证据和在线学习设置的类型。Zimmerman的模型(2002)被用来检验SRL阶段。关于学习辅助教学的证据与四个命题相关:学习辅助教学是否i)改善学习成果,ii)改善学习支持和教学,iii)广泛部署,以及iv)合乎道德地使用。结果表明,大多数研究集中在SRL部分的预见和性能阶段,而很少关注反思。我们发现LA几乎没有证据表明i)学习成果的改善(20%),ii)学习支持和教学的改善(22%)。LA也被发现iii)没有被广泛使用iv)很少有研究(15%)在伦理上进行研究。总体而言,研究结果表明,LA研究主要是为了衡量而不是支持SRL。因此,迫切需要进一步开发学习辅助机制,以便最终利用它们在在线学习环境中培养学生的学习辅助能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
How working memory capacity limits success in self-directed learning: a cognitive model of search and concept formation Quantifying data sensitivity: precise demonstration of care when building student prediction models Towards automated analysis of cognitive presence in MOOC discussions: a manual classification study Towards automatic cross-language classification of cognitive presence in online discussions What college students say, and what they do: aligning self-regulated learning theory with behavioral logs
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1