Intervention in XIXth Century International Law and the Distinction between Rebellions, Insurrections and Civil Wars

Marco Roscini
{"title":"Intervention in XIXth Century International Law and the Distinction between Rebellions, Insurrections and Civil Wars","authors":"Marco Roscini","doi":"10.1163/9789004440555_012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The present article looks at how some of these customary rules on foreign intervention in situations of internal unrest developed. In particular, different forms of internal unrest are examined in order to establish whether they entailed different regimes of external intervention. The article starts with rebellions and insurrections and then moves to discuss civil wars by distinguishing three situations: that where the civil war has led to the de facto secession of part of a state, that where the insurgents have been recognized as belligerents by the government of the state in civil strife and/or by third states, and that of a civil war where no recognition of belligerency has occurred. Finally, this article briefly looks at the alleged existence of a customary rule providing for recognition of insurgency and at its effects on third state intervention.","PeriodicalId":319707,"journal":{"name":"Israel Yearbook on Human Rights, Volume 50 (2020)","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Israel Yearbook on Human Rights, Volume 50 (2020)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004440555_012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The present article looks at how some of these customary rules on foreign intervention in situations of internal unrest developed. In particular, different forms of internal unrest are examined in order to establish whether they entailed different regimes of external intervention. The article starts with rebellions and insurrections and then moves to discuss civil wars by distinguishing three situations: that where the civil war has led to the de facto secession of part of a state, that where the insurgents have been recognized as belligerents by the government of the state in civil strife and/or by third states, and that of a civil war where no recognition of belligerency has occurred. Finally, this article briefly looks at the alleged existence of a customary rule providing for recognition of insurgency and at its effects on third state intervention.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
19世纪国际法的干预与叛乱、暴动和内战的区别
本文着眼于在国内动乱情况下外国干预的一些习惯规则是如何发展起来的。特别是,对不同形式的内部动乱进行审查,以确定它们是否涉及不同的外部干预制度。这篇文章从叛乱和起义开始,然后通过区分三种情况来讨论内战:内战导致一个国家的一部分事实上的分离,叛乱分子被内战中的国家政府和/或第三国承认为交战者,以及内战中没有承认交战的情况。最后,本文简要介绍了所谓存在的一项规定承认叛乱的习惯规则及其对第三国干预的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
From Ancient Israel to Modern Israel: The Historical Development of the Protection of a Fetus in Criminal Law Summary of Recent Cases of the Courts of Israel Relating to Prize Law and Israel’s Naval Blockade of the Gaza Strip States Reports to Human Treaty Bodies: An Historical Introduction The Yanukovych Trial in Ukraine: A Revival of the Crime of Aggression? Preliminary Material
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1