KEMAMPUAN BERFIKIR GEOMETRI PESERTA DIDIK KELAS IX DALAM PEMBELAJARAN DENGAN PENDEKATAN ETNOMATEMATIKA

Rozi Fitriza, Elsa Desmaniati, Hizbul Fatiya Kudus
{"title":"KEMAMPUAN BERFIKIR GEOMETRI PESERTA DIDIK KELAS IX DALAM PEMBELAJARAN DENGAN PENDEKATAN ETNOMATEMATIKA","authors":"Rozi Fitriza, Elsa Desmaniati, Hizbul Fatiya Kudus","doi":"10.30821/axiom.v11i2.11422","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to discuss the differences in geometric thinking ability among students who learn mathematics with an ethnomathematics approach and students who learn mathematics with an ordinary/scientific approach. The development of students’ geometric thinking ability is based on Van Hiele’s level of geometric thinking. This study follows a quantitative research approach with an experimental method. The samples of this study are two groups of ninth-grade students at MTsN 3 Pariaman city. The instrument used in this study is in the form of a geometric thinking ability test for Geometry Transformation material. The data were analyzed by using a Mann-Whitney test. The results indicate that the geometric thinking ability is different among students taught using an ethnomathematics approach and an ordinary or scientific approach. The average geometric thinking ability of students who learned using an ethnomathematics approach is higher than students taught with an ordinary or scientific approach. The class taught using the ethnomathematics approach shows that 93.75% of students reached the visualization thinking stage, 87.5% of students reached the analysis stage, and 81.25% of students reached the informal deductive stage, but no students reached the deductive thinking stage. This study proves that ethnomathematics approach in a geometry lesson can facilitate the development of students’ geometric thinking skills.","PeriodicalId":234603,"journal":{"name":"AXIOM : Jurnal Pendidikan dan Matematika","volume":"40 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AXIOM : Jurnal Pendidikan dan Matematika","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30821/axiom.v11i2.11422","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This study aims to discuss the differences in geometric thinking ability among students who learn mathematics with an ethnomathematics approach and students who learn mathematics with an ordinary/scientific approach. The development of students’ geometric thinking ability is based on Van Hiele’s level of geometric thinking. This study follows a quantitative research approach with an experimental method. The samples of this study are two groups of ninth-grade students at MTsN 3 Pariaman city. The instrument used in this study is in the form of a geometric thinking ability test for Geometry Transformation material. The data were analyzed by using a Mann-Whitney test. The results indicate that the geometric thinking ability is different among students taught using an ethnomathematics approach and an ordinary or scientific approach. The average geometric thinking ability of students who learned using an ethnomathematics approach is higher than students taught with an ordinary or scientific approach. The class taught using the ethnomathematics approach shows that 93.75% of students reached the visualization thinking stage, 87.5% of students reached the analysis stage, and 81.25% of students reached the informal deductive stage, but no students reached the deductive thinking stage. This study proves that ethnomathematics approach in a geometry lesson can facilitate the development of students’ geometric thinking skills.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
本研究旨在探讨采用民族数学方法学习数学的学生与采用普通/科学方法学习数学的学生在几何思维能力上的差异。学生几何思维能力的发展是以范·海尔的几何思维水平为基础的。本研究采用定量研究与实验相结合的方法。本研究的样本为两组mtsn3 Pariaman市的九年级学生。本研究使用的工具是几何变换材料的几何思维能力测试。采用曼-惠特尼检验对数据进行分析。结果表明,民族数学教学与普通教学或科学教学对学生几何思维能力的影响是不同的。使用民族数学方法学习的学生的平均几何思维能力高于使用普通方法或科学方法学习的学生。采用民族数学方法教学的班级显示,93.75%的学生达到了可视化思维阶段,87.5%的学生达到了分析阶段,81.25%的学生达到了非正式演绎阶段,但没有学生达到演绎思维阶段。本研究证明,在几何课中运用民族数学方法可以促进学生几何思维能力的发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
ANALISIS KESULITAN MAHASISWA DALAM MENYELESAIKAN SOAL PEMAHAMAN MATEMATIS PADA MATA KULIAH TEORI PELUANG PENGEMBANGAN MODUL MATEMATIKA BERBASIS CERITA BERGAMBAR DAN BERKARAKTER RASA PEDULI SOSIAL IMPLEMENTATION OF TRANSPORTATION METHODS IN OPTIMIZING THE DISTRIBUTION OF HIJAB PRODUCTS AT AYASHA HIJAB STORE ANALISIS KEMAMPUAN PEMECAHAN MASALAH MATEMATIS SISWA PADA POKOK BAHASAN PROGRAM LINIER BERDASARKAN TINGKAT INTELLIGENCE QUOTIENT ETNOMATEMATIKA: EKSPLORASI KONSEP MATEMATIKA DAN NILAI KARAKTER PADA PERMAINAN TRADISIONAL JAWA GANJILAN
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1