Dodes (diagnostic nodes) for Guideline Manipulation

P. Putora, Marcel Blattner, A. Papachristofilou, Fabio Mariotti, Beatrice Paoli, L. Plasswilm
{"title":"Dodes (diagnostic nodes) for Guideline Manipulation","authors":"P. Putora, Marcel Blattner, A. Papachristofilou, Fabio Mariotti, Beatrice Paoli, L. Plasswilm","doi":"10.3933/JROI-2-1-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Treatment recommendations (guidelines) are commonly represented in text form. Based on parameters (questions) recommendations are defined (answers). Objectives: To improve handling, alternative forms of representation are required. Methods: The concept of Dodes (diagnostic nodes) has been developed. Dodes contain answers and questions. Dodes are based on linked nodes and additionally contain descriptive information and recommendations. Dodes are organized hierarchically into Dode trees. Dode categories must be defined to prevent redundancy. Results: A centralized and neutral Dode database can provide standardization, which is a requirement for the comparison of recommendations. Centralized administration of Dode categories can provide information about diagnostic criteria (Dode categories) underutilized in existing recommendations (Dode trees). Conclusions: Representing clinical recommendations in Dode trees improves their manageability, handling and updateability.\n","PeriodicalId":426862,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Radiation Oncology Informatics","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Radiation Oncology Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3933/JROI-2-1-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Background: Treatment recommendations (guidelines) are commonly represented in text form. Based on parameters (questions) recommendations are defined (answers). Objectives: To improve handling, alternative forms of representation are required. Methods: The concept of Dodes (diagnostic nodes) has been developed. Dodes contain answers and questions. Dodes are based on linked nodes and additionally contain descriptive information and recommendations. Dodes are organized hierarchically into Dode trees. Dode categories must be defined to prevent redundancy. Results: A centralized and neutral Dode database can provide standardization, which is a requirement for the comparison of recommendations. Centralized administration of Dode categories can provide information about diagnostic criteria (Dode categories) underutilized in existing recommendations (Dode trees). Conclusions: Representing clinical recommendations in Dode trees improves their manageability, handling and updateability.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
指南操作的诊断节点
背景:治疗建议(指南)通常以文本形式表示。根据参数(问题)定义建议(答案)。目的:为了改善处理,需要其他形式的代表。方法:提出诊断节点(Dodes)概念。谜语包含答案和问题。Dodes基于链接节点,另外还包含描述性信息和推荐。Dode按层次结构组织到Dode树中。必须定义代码类别以防止冗余。结果:一个集中、中立的Dode数据库可以提供标准化,这是比较推荐的必要条件。对Dode分类的集中管理可以提供有关诊断标准(Dode分类)的信息,这些诊断标准在现有建议(Dode树)中未得到充分利用。结论:在Dode树中表示临床建议可提高其可管理性、处理性和可更新性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Patient self-reported follow-up for radiation oncology patients during COVID-19: feasibility and patient-clinician agreement Multilayer Perceptron Analysis of Radiomics to Predict Local Recurrence of Lung Cancer After Radiotherapy Data-driven shared decision-making: a paradigm shift How to PROceed? Reviewing obstacles and perspectives in patient-centered digital care in radiation oncology Procedural Creation of Medical Reports with Hierarchical Information Processing in Radiation Oncology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1