Part VII Inter-linkages with Other Regimes, Ch.44 Investment

Miles Kate
{"title":"Part VII Inter-linkages with Other Regimes, Ch.44 Investment","authors":"Miles Kate","doi":"10.1093/law/9780198849155.003.0044","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter discusses the relationship between international investment law and international environmental law. The contestation between the fields that emerged in the context of investor-state arbitration was blunt and initially resulted in the rules of international investment law being prioritized over the obligations of states under multilateral environmental agreements (MEAs), domestic environmental protection policies and decision-making, and the host state's public welfare regulatory space. Responding to that contest, the new generation bilateral investment treaties (BITs) and free trade agreements (FTAs) reflect the desire of states to work within a more balanced version of the environment/investment nexus. It is not yet, however, at a point where it can be said to be equally balanced in the engagement of international environmental law and international investment law, and there is evidently still room for significant improvements in the way in which environmental issues are understood and interpreted by arbitrators in investor-state disputes. But the culture and context in which the environment and investment are meeting is most definitely shifting and it is hoped that the trajectory continues still further in that direction.","PeriodicalId":184658,"journal":{"name":"The Oxford Handbook of International Environmental Law","volume":"316 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Oxford Handbook of International Environmental Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/law/9780198849155.003.0044","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This chapter discusses the relationship between international investment law and international environmental law. The contestation between the fields that emerged in the context of investor-state arbitration was blunt and initially resulted in the rules of international investment law being prioritized over the obligations of states under multilateral environmental agreements (MEAs), domestic environmental protection policies and decision-making, and the host state's public welfare regulatory space. Responding to that contest, the new generation bilateral investment treaties (BITs) and free trade agreements (FTAs) reflect the desire of states to work within a more balanced version of the environment/investment nexus. It is not yet, however, at a point where it can be said to be equally balanced in the engagement of international environmental law and international investment law, and there is evidently still room for significant improvements in the way in which environmental issues are understood and interpreted by arbitrators in investor-state disputes. But the culture and context in which the environment and investment are meeting is most definitely shifting and it is hoped that the trajectory continues still further in that direction.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
第七部分与其他制度的相互联系,Ch.44投资
本章论述了国际投资法与国际环境法的关系。在投资者-国家仲裁背景下出现的领域之间的争论是直截了当的,最初导致国际投资法规则优先于国家在多边环境协定(MEAs)下的义务、国内环境保护政策和决策以及东道国的公共福利监管空间。新一代双边投资协定(BITs)和自由贸易协定(FTAs)是对这一竞争的回应,反映了各国希望在更平衡的环境/投资关系框架内开展工作的愿望。然而,在国际环境法和国际投资法的参与方面,它还没有达到可以说是平等平衡的程度,而且在投资者-国家争端中,仲裁员对环境问题的理解和解释方式显然仍有显著改进的空间。但是,环境与投资相结合的文化和背景无疑正在发生变化,希望这一轨迹能够继续朝着这个方向发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Part III Conceptual Pillars, Ch.18 Precaution Part VI Actors, Ch.35 The State Part II Analytical Approaches, Ch.13 Ethical Considerations Part II Analytical Approaches, Ch.9 International Relations Theory Part II Analytical Approaches, Ch.15 The Role of Science
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1