Research on the Reasonable Application of Proportional Liability in Medical Damage Liability

Qian Wang, Lening Qiu
{"title":"Research on the Reasonable Application of Proportional Liability in Medical Damage Liability","authors":"Qian Wang, Lening Qiu","doi":"10.22397/bml.2022.29.31","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Civil Code, which came into effect in China in 2021, clearly stipulates the liability for medical damage, and then a large number of medical disputes have occurred in the past two years, which requires theoretical research to respond in time. Due to the high professionalism and complexity of medical activities, patients' own special physique, primary diseases and other related situations often appear in medical damage, which makes it difficult to directly judge the causal relationship in medical damage liability. The court needs to allocate the responsibility in a case when the causal relationship between facts is unknown, which may easily lead to unfair and just judgment results. In view of the above phenomenon, the theory of proportional liability is widely used in judicial practice at home and abroad, and it is also supported by the legislative and academic circles. Of course, before the application of proportional liability, the following problems must be solved theoretically: how to understand the proportional liability in tort law from the doctrinal level, the rationality of the application of proportional liability, and the construction of specific rules for the application of proportional liability. Proportional liability is that the infringer takes responsibility based on the possibility of the damage caused by the infringement. At present, this theory has developed to the degree of rational construction by introducing probability causality and combining the discretion of damage. This paper adopts the methods of normative research, empirical research and comparative law research, trying to clarify the core connotation and theoretical development of proportional liability, demonstrating the rationality of its existence from the legal basis, theoretical value and practical significance of the application of this theory, and finally devoting itself to constructing systematic and complete applicable rules of proportional liability, making necessary preparations for legislation, so as to solve complex and difficult related problems in practice. \n \n2021年中国开始施行的《民法典》明确规定医疗损害责任,随之近两年的医疗纠纷案件大量发生,需要理论研究予以及时回应。由于医疗活动具有高度专业性和复杂性,医疗损害中又经常出现患者自身特殊体质、原发疾病等相关情况,导致医疗损害责任中的因果关系难以直接判断。法院需要在事实因果关系不明的情况下进行个案中的责任分配,容易导致判决结果不够公平正义。针对上述现象,国内外司法实务中大量采用比例责任理论,该理论也受到立法和学理界的支持。当然,在比例责任适用前,必须在理论上解决以下问题:如何从教义学层面理解侵权法上的比例责任、比例责任适用的合理性问题、比例责任适用的具体规则构建问题。比例责任是侵权人基于侵权行为对损害结果造成的可能性大小来承担责任,目前该理论已经发展到通过引入概率因果关系并结合损害的酌定来理性建构的程度。本文采用了规范研究、实证研究、比较法研究等方法,试图厘清比例责任的核心内涵与理论发展脉络,从该理论适用的法理基础、理论价值、实践意义来论证其存在的合理性,最终致力于构建系统完整的比例责任适用规则,为立法进行必要的准备,从而解决实务中复杂疑难的相关问题。","PeriodicalId":430360,"journal":{"name":"Wonkwang University Legal Research Institute","volume":"179 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wonkwang University Legal Research Institute","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22397/bml.2022.29.31","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Civil Code, which came into effect in China in 2021, clearly stipulates the liability for medical damage, and then a large number of medical disputes have occurred in the past two years, which requires theoretical research to respond in time. Due to the high professionalism and complexity of medical activities, patients' own special physique, primary diseases and other related situations often appear in medical damage, which makes it difficult to directly judge the causal relationship in medical damage liability. The court needs to allocate the responsibility in a case when the causal relationship between facts is unknown, which may easily lead to unfair and just judgment results. In view of the above phenomenon, the theory of proportional liability is widely used in judicial practice at home and abroad, and it is also supported by the legislative and academic circles. Of course, before the application of proportional liability, the following problems must be solved theoretically: how to understand the proportional liability in tort law from the doctrinal level, the rationality of the application of proportional liability, and the construction of specific rules for the application of proportional liability. Proportional liability is that the infringer takes responsibility based on the possibility of the damage caused by the infringement. At present, this theory has developed to the degree of rational construction by introducing probability causality and combining the discretion of damage. This paper adopts the methods of normative research, empirical research and comparative law research, trying to clarify the core connotation and theoretical development of proportional liability, demonstrating the rationality of its existence from the legal basis, theoretical value and practical significance of the application of this theory, and finally devoting itself to constructing systematic and complete applicable rules of proportional liability, making necessary preparations for legislation, so as to solve complex and difficult related problems in practice. 2021年中国开始施行的《民法典》明确规定医疗损害责任,随之近两年的医疗纠纷案件大量发生,需要理论研究予以及时回应。由于医疗活动具有高度专业性和复杂性,医疗损害中又经常出现患者自身特殊体质、原发疾病等相关情况,导致医疗损害责任中的因果关系难以直接判断。法院需要在事实因果关系不明的情况下进行个案中的责任分配,容易导致判决结果不够公平正义。针对上述现象,国内外司法实务中大量采用比例责任理论,该理论也受到立法和学理界的支持。当然,在比例责任适用前,必须在理论上解决以下问题:如何从教义学层面理解侵权法上的比例责任、比例责任适用的合理性问题、比例责任适用的具体规则构建问题。比例责任是侵权人基于侵权行为对损害结果造成的可能性大小来承担责任,目前该理论已经发展到通过引入概率因果关系并结合损害的酌定来理性建构的程度。本文采用了规范研究、实证研究、比较法研究等方法,试图厘清比例责任的核心内涵与理论发展脉络,从该理论适用的法理基础、理论价值、实践意义来论证其存在的合理性,最终致力于构建系统完整的比例责任适用规则,为立法进行必要的准备,从而解决实务中复杂疑难的相关问题。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
比例责任在医疗损害责任中的合理适用研究
中国于2021年生效的《民法典》明确规定了医疗损害责任,再加上近两年发生了大量的医疗纠纷,需要理论研究及时应对。由于医疗活动的高度专业性和复杂性,医疗损害中往往会出现患者自身的特殊体质、原发疾病等相关情况,使得医疗损害责任中的因果关系难以直接判断。在案件中,法院需要在事实之间的因果关系不明的情况下进行责任分配,这很容易导致判决结果的不公正。鉴于上述现象,比例责任理论在国内外司法实践中得到了广泛的应用,也得到了立法界和学术界的支持。当然,在适用比例责任之前,必须从理论上解决以下问题:如何从理论层面理解侵权法中的比例责任,比例责任适用的合理性,以及比例责任适用的具体规则构建。比例责任是指侵权人根据侵权行为造成损害的可能性承担责任。目前,该理论通过引入概率因果关系,结合损害的自由裁量权,已发展到理性建构的程度。本文采用规范研究、实证研究和比较法研究的方法,试图厘清比例责任的核心内涵和理论发展,并从比例责任理论适用的法律依据、理论价值和现实意义等方面论证其存在的合理性,最终致力于构建系统完整的比例责任适用规则。做好必要的立法准备,解决实践中有关复杂难点问题。2021年中国开始施行的《民法典》明确规定医疗损害责任,随之近两年的医疗纠纷案件大量发生,需要理论研究予以及时回应。由于医疗活动具有高度专业性和复杂性,医疗损害中又经常出现患者自身特殊体质、原发疾病等相关情况,导致医疗损害责任中的因果关系难以直接判断。法院需要在事实因果关系不明的情况下进行个案中的责任分配,容易导致判决结果不够公平正义。针对上述现象,国内外司法实务中大量采用比例责任理论,该理论也受到立法和学理界的支持。当然,在比例责任适用前,必须在理论上解决以下问题:如何从教义学层面理解侵权法上的比例责任、比例责任适用的合理性问题、比例责任适用的具体规则构建问题。比例责任是侵权人基于侵权行为对损害结果造成的可能性大小来承担责任,目前该理论已经发展到通过引入概率因果关系并结合损害的酌定来理性建构的程度。本文采用了规范研究、实证研究、比较法研究等方法,试图厘清比例责任的核心内涵与理论发展脉络,从该理论适用的法理基础、理论价值、实践意义来论证其存在的合理性,最终致力于构建系统完整的比例责任适用规则,为立法进行必要的准备,从而解决实务中复杂疑难的相关问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The explanation of medical practice according to the Article 24-2 of the Medical Act does a protect the patient's right to self-determination? A Study on the Introduction of AI Robot Tax Analysis of Supreme Court precedents related to application period under administrative statutes and legal implications: Focusing on the Supreme Court 2021.3.18. announcement 2018Du47264 en banc decision A Study on effectiveness of the Serious Accident Punishment Act A Study on the Legal Issues of the South-North Equity Joint Venture Enterprise in Kaesong
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1