Mixed methods study of middle school mathematics teachers' content knowledge in usa and russia using sequential nested design

M. Tchoshanov
{"title":"Mixed methods study of middle school mathematics teachers' content knowledge in usa and russia using sequential nested design","authors":"M. Tchoshanov","doi":"10.26907/1562-5419-2019-22-5-255-286","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The sequential nested mixed methods study focused on comparative analysis of middle school mathematics teachers’ content knowledge in two countries. The study consisted of two stages: (1) quantitative study of teacher content knowledge; (2) qualitative study of teacher topic-specific content knowledge. The initial sample for the first stage included lower secondary mathematics teachers from the U.S. (grades 6–9, N=102) and Russia (grades 5–9, N=97). The Teacher Content Knowledge Survey (TCKS) was applied to assess teacher content knowledge based on the cognitive domains of Knowing, Applying, and Reasoning, as well as addressing the lower secondary mathematics topics of Number, Algebra, Geometry, Data and Chance. The second stage – an interpretive cross-case study – aimed at the examination of the U.S. and Russian teachers’ topic-specific knowledge on the division of fractions. For the second stage, N=16 teachers (8 – from the U.S., and 8 – from Russia) were selected for the study using non-probability purposive sampling technique based on teachers’ scores on the TCKS. Teachers were interviewed on the topic of fraction division using questions addressing their content and pedagogical content knowledge. The study revealed that there are explicit similarities and differences in teachers’ content knowledge as well as its cognitive types. The study results may inform the field on priorities placed on lower secondary mathematics teachers’ knowledge in the USA and Russia. It also suggests close comparison and learning about issues related to teacher knowledge in both countries with a potential focus on re-examining practices in teacher preparation and professional development.","PeriodicalId":235410,"journal":{"name":"Russ. Digit. Libr. J.","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Russ. Digit. Libr. J.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26907/1562-5419-2019-22-5-255-286","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The sequential nested mixed methods study focused on comparative analysis of middle school mathematics teachers’ content knowledge in two countries. The study consisted of two stages: (1) quantitative study of teacher content knowledge; (2) qualitative study of teacher topic-specific content knowledge. The initial sample for the first stage included lower secondary mathematics teachers from the U.S. (grades 6–9, N=102) and Russia (grades 5–9, N=97). The Teacher Content Knowledge Survey (TCKS) was applied to assess teacher content knowledge based on the cognitive domains of Knowing, Applying, and Reasoning, as well as addressing the lower secondary mathematics topics of Number, Algebra, Geometry, Data and Chance. The second stage – an interpretive cross-case study – aimed at the examination of the U.S. and Russian teachers’ topic-specific knowledge on the division of fractions. For the second stage, N=16 teachers (8 – from the U.S., and 8 – from Russia) were selected for the study using non-probability purposive sampling technique based on teachers’ scores on the TCKS. Teachers were interviewed on the topic of fraction division using questions addressing their content and pedagogical content knowledge. The study revealed that there are explicit similarities and differences in teachers’ content knowledge as well as its cognitive types. The study results may inform the field on priorities placed on lower secondary mathematics teachers’ knowledge in the USA and Russia. It also suggests close comparison and learning about issues related to teacher knowledge in both countries with a potential focus on re-examining practices in teacher preparation and professional development.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
美国和俄罗斯中学数学教师内容知识的顺序嵌套设计混合方法研究
顺序嵌套混合方法研究侧重于两国中学数学教师内容知识的比较分析。本研究分为两个阶段:(1)教师内容知识的定量研究;(2)教师专题内容知识的定性研究。第一阶段的初始样本包括来自美国(6-9年级,N=102)和俄罗斯(5-9年级,N=97)的初中数学教师。教师内容知识调查(TCKS)用于评估教师基于认知领域的知识,应用和推理,以及解决初中数学主题的数字,代数,几何,数据和机会。第二阶段是解释性交叉案例研究,旨在考察美国和俄罗斯教师在分数除法方面的特定主题知识。第二阶段,采用基于教师TCKS分数的非概率有目的抽样技术,选取N=16名教师(美国8名,俄罗斯8名)进行研究。教师接受了关于分数除法的访谈,使用问题来解决他们的内容和教学内容知识。研究发现,教师的内容知识及其认知类型存在明显的异同。研究结果可以为美国和俄罗斯初中数学教师知识的优先级提供信息。报告还建议密切比较和学习两国教师知识相关问题,并可能重点重新审视教师准备和专业发展方面的做法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The concept of automatic creation tool for computer game scenario prototype Debugging Parallel Programs in DVM-System On Systematization of Programming Paradigms by Decision-Making Priorities On Modeling the Operation of the Defense Industries of the Economy: Information Support Recommender System in the Process of Scientific Peer Review in Mathematical Journal
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1