Differentiated Integration in Europe after Brexit: An Institutional and Legal Analysis

Giacinto della Cananea
{"title":"Differentiated Integration in Europe after Brexit: An Institutional and Legal Analysis","authors":"Giacinto della Cananea","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3237402","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The outcome of the referendum that has been held in the United Kingdom about leaving the European Union (Brexit) has fuelled the debate, in political and academic circles, about the future of the EU in the perspective of differentiated integration. The paper seeks to contribute to the debate, by arguing that it should be made clear that the differing solutions that are proposed for the challenges with which the Union is confronted are based not only on different legal foundations, but also on distinct ideas and beliefs about European construction. The paper explains how the institutional and legal mechanisms of differentiated integration can be assessed on the basis of the twin criteria of clarity and coherence, in the sense that some of them can be said to be coherent with one vision of Europe, not with the other one. It focuses, first, on institutional mechanisms of differentiated integration within the EU and, second, on legal mechanisms that imply an interaction between EU members and third countries, including the EEA. It is suggested that those mechanisms can be relevant also in the light of a Member State’s decision to leave the EU, as it happened with Brexit.","PeriodicalId":401648,"journal":{"name":"European Public Law: EU eJournal","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Public Law: EU eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3237402","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The outcome of the referendum that has been held in the United Kingdom about leaving the European Union (Brexit) has fuelled the debate, in political and academic circles, about the future of the EU in the perspective of differentiated integration. The paper seeks to contribute to the debate, by arguing that it should be made clear that the differing solutions that are proposed for the challenges with which the Union is confronted are based not only on different legal foundations, but also on distinct ideas and beliefs about European construction. The paper explains how the institutional and legal mechanisms of differentiated integration can be assessed on the basis of the twin criteria of clarity and coherence, in the sense that some of them can be said to be coherent with one vision of Europe, not with the other one. It focuses, first, on institutional mechanisms of differentiated integration within the EU and, second, on legal mechanisms that imply an interaction between EU members and third countries, including the EEA. It is suggested that those mechanisms can be relevant also in the light of a Member State’s decision to leave the EU, as it happened with Brexit.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
英国脱欧后欧洲差别化一体化:制度与法律分析
英国举行的脱欧公投结果引发了政界和学术界关于欧盟未来在差别化一体化视角下的争论。本文试图为这场辩论做出贡献,认为应该明确的是,针对欧盟面临的挑战提出的不同解决方案不仅基于不同的法律基础,而且基于关于欧洲建设的不同想法和信念。本文解释了如何根据清晰性和一致性的双重标准来评估差别化一体化的制度和法律机制,从某种意义上说,其中一些可以说是与欧洲的一种愿景一致,而不是与另一种愿景一致。它首先关注欧盟内部差异化一体化的制度机制,其次关注欧盟成员国与第三国(包括欧洲经济区)之间互动的法律机制。有人建议,鉴于成员国决定离开欧盟,这些机制也可能相关,就像英国脱欧一样。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The European Parliament and Brexit Commission v Poland C-562/19 P: Turnover Taxation and State Aid Law Brexit and the Implementation of the Withdrawal Agreement The EU Protection of Tax Data Transferred to Third Countries 'Re-Constituting' the Internal Market: Towards a Common Law of International Trade?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1