Greed is Good: From Super-Harvest to Recovery in a Stochastic Predator-Prey System

Yuanming Ni, L. Sandal, S. Kvamsdal, Diwakar Poudel
{"title":"Greed is Good: From Super-Harvest to Recovery in a Stochastic Predator-Prey System","authors":"Yuanming Ni, L. Sandal, S. Kvamsdal, Diwakar Poudel","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3447879","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper demonstrates a predator-prey system of cod and capelin that confronts a possible scenario of prey extinction under the first-best policy in a stochastic world. We discover a novel ‘super-harvest’ phenomenon that the optimal harvest of the predator is even higher than the myopic policy, or the ‘greedy solution’, on part of the state space. This intrinsic attempt to harvest more predator to protect the prey is a critical evidence supporting the idea behind ‘greed is good’. We ban prey harvest and increase predator harvest in a designated state space area based on the optimal policy. Three heuristic recovery plans are generated following this principle. We employ stochastic simulations to analyse the probability of prey recovery and evaluate corresponding costs in terms of value loss percentage. We find that the alternative policies enhance prey recovery rates mostly around the area of 50% recovery probability under the optimal policy. When we scale up the predator harvest by 1.5, the prey recovery rate escalates for as much as 28% at a cost of 5% value loss. We establish two strategies: modest deviation from the optimal on a large area or intense measure on a small area. It seems more cost-effective to target the stock space with accuracy than to simply boost predator harvest when the aim is to achieve remarkable improvement of prey recovery probability.","PeriodicalId":436211,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Natural Resource Economics (Topic)","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: Natural Resource Economics (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3447879","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This paper demonstrates a predator-prey system of cod and capelin that confronts a possible scenario of prey extinction under the first-best policy in a stochastic world. We discover a novel ‘super-harvest’ phenomenon that the optimal harvest of the predator is even higher than the myopic policy, or the ‘greedy solution’, on part of the state space. This intrinsic attempt to harvest more predator to protect the prey is a critical evidence supporting the idea behind ‘greed is good’. We ban prey harvest and increase predator harvest in a designated state space area based on the optimal policy. Three heuristic recovery plans are generated following this principle. We employ stochastic simulations to analyse the probability of prey recovery and evaluate corresponding costs in terms of value loss percentage. We find that the alternative policies enhance prey recovery rates mostly around the area of 50% recovery probability under the optimal policy. When we scale up the predator harvest by 1.5, the prey recovery rate escalates for as much as 28% at a cost of 5% value loss. We establish two strategies: modest deviation from the optimal on a large area or intense measure on a small area. It seems more cost-effective to target the stock space with accuracy than to simply boost predator harvest when the aim is to achieve remarkable improvement of prey recovery probability.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
贪婪是好的:从超级收获到随机捕食-猎物系统中的恢复
本文讨论了在随机世界中,在最优策略下,鳕鱼和毛鳞鱼的捕食-食饵系统可能面临猎物灭绝的情形。我们发现了一种新的“超级收获”现象,即在部分状态空间上,捕食者的最优收获甚至高于近视策略或“贪婪解决方案”。这种内在的试图获取更多的捕食者来保护猎物的行为是支持“贪婪是好的”这一观点的关键证据。基于最优策略,在指定的状态空间区域内禁止捕获猎物,增加捕食者的捕获量。根据这一原则生成了三个启发式恢复计划。我们采用随机模拟来分析猎物恢复的概率,并根据价值损失百分比评估相应的成本。研究发现,在最优策略下,可选策略对猎物恢复率的提高主要在恢复概率为50%的范围内。当我们将捕食者的收获量增加1.5倍时,猎物的恢复率会以5%的价值损失为代价上升28%。我们建立了两种策略:在大范围内适度偏离最优,或在小范围内强烈偏离最优。当目标是实现猎物恢复概率的显著提高时,精确地瞄准种群空间似乎比简单地增加捕食者的收获更具有成本效益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Natural Resources, Institutions and the Quality-adjusted Human Capital How Many km2 of Solar Panels in Spain and how much battery backup would it take to power Germany On the Long-Term Coupling and Short-Term Decoupling of Crude Oil and Natural Gas Prices Structural Behavioral Models for Rights-Based Fisheries Stranded Fossil Fuel Reserves and Firm Value
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1