Studying pedagogical practices in physics through the lens of epistemic (in)justice

Joine� Taylor, Z. Hazari, Idaykis Rodriguez, G. Potvin, Miguel Rodriguez
{"title":"Studying pedagogical practices in physics through the lens of epistemic (in)justice","authors":"Joine� Taylor, Z. Hazari, Idaykis Rodriguez, G. Potvin, Miguel Rodriguez","doi":"10.1119/perc.2022.pr.taylor","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"While some students successfully navigate normative practices associated with physics instruction, physics educators have argued that many students encounter barriers that lead to undesirable learning outcomes. The reasons for such learning outcomes in physics are multifaceted, with increasing attention being placed on shifting traditional pedagogical practices that limit student participation or promote more factual knowledge over knowledge construction processes. In addition, some active learning practices may also be insufficient for students to leverage personal resources (ideational) and environmental resources (material and relational). By inhibiting epistemic agency, practices that limit the leveraging of such resources have been associated with learning barriers which, we argue, engenders a form of injustice we describe as “Epistemic Injustice”. In this paper, we use the framework of Epistemic Injustice to analyze small group interactions in an introductory physics classroom. Through a process we call “Epistemic Resource Negotiation”, an episode of video-recorded data of student group work in a Modeling Physics course is examined. In our analysis, we focus on instructional practices to identify epistemic resources and how they are negotiated and accessed in ways that inhibit or afford agency. Our work presents an analytical method that may be used to understand how to move toward more equitable pedagogical practices.","PeriodicalId":253382,"journal":{"name":"2022 Physics Education Research Conference Proceedings","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 Physics Education Research Conference Proceedings","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1119/perc.2022.pr.taylor","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

While some students successfully navigate normative practices associated with physics instruction, physics educators have argued that many students encounter barriers that lead to undesirable learning outcomes. The reasons for such learning outcomes in physics are multifaceted, with increasing attention being placed on shifting traditional pedagogical practices that limit student participation or promote more factual knowledge over knowledge construction processes. In addition, some active learning practices may also be insufficient for students to leverage personal resources (ideational) and environmental resources (material and relational). By inhibiting epistemic agency, practices that limit the leveraging of such resources have been associated with learning barriers which, we argue, engenders a form of injustice we describe as “Epistemic Injustice”. In this paper, we use the framework of Epistemic Injustice to analyze small group interactions in an introductory physics classroom. Through a process we call “Epistemic Resource Negotiation”, an episode of video-recorded data of student group work in a Modeling Physics course is examined. In our analysis, we focus on instructional practices to identify epistemic resources and how they are negotiated and accessed in ways that inhibit or afford agency. Our work presents an analytical method that may be used to understand how to move toward more equitable pedagogical practices.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从认识公正的角度研究物理教学实践
虽然一些学生成功地驾驭了与物理教学相关的规范实践,但物理教育家认为,许多学生遇到了导致不良学习结果的障碍。物理学中出现这种学习结果的原因是多方面的,人们越来越关注改变传统的教学实践,这些教学实践限制了学生的参与,或者在知识构建过程中促进了更多的事实性知识。此外,一些主动的学习实践也可能不足以让学生充分利用个人资源(概念)和环境资源(物质和关系)。通过抑制认知代理,限制这些资源利用的实践与学习障碍有关,我们认为,这产生了一种我们称之为“认知不公正”的不公正形式。在本文中,我们使用认知不公正的框架来分析物理导论课堂中的小组互动。通过“认知资源协商”的过程,对建模物理课程中学生小组作业的一段录像数据进行了研究。在我们的分析中,我们将重点放在教学实践上,以确定知识资源,以及如何以抑制或负担代理的方式协商和获取这些资源。我们的工作提出了一种分析方法,可以用来理解如何走向更公平的教学实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Synthesizing disabled physics students' pathways to access: a call for more access talk Analyzing Multiple-Choice-Multiple-Response Items Using Item Response Theory Methods for utilizing Item response theory with Coupled, Multiple-Response assessments Impact of mathematical reasoning on students� understanding of quantum optics Leveraging queer epistemic subjectivity to advance justice through physics teaching
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1