Repairing the damage: wishful, defensive, or restorative?

S. Long
{"title":"Repairing the damage: wishful, defensive, or restorative?","authors":"S. Long","doi":"10.33212/osd.v21n1.2021.28","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Damage, physically and to the psyche is inevitable. This is whether it is caused unconsciously, through consciously malicious intent, thoughtlessness, as collateral or just through a hostile environment or the warring of internal forces. At the group or social level, the last few years have seen much damage in terms of economic recession, climate change, racial inequalities, and domestic violence.\nThe desire to repair follows such damage. The psychoanalytic focus on reparation sees the process as an attempt by a person to repair perceived damage to another or, more precisely, to an internal image of the other—a loved other. Large groups such as organisations and societies also do damage and sometimes acknowledge this and make attempts to repair—perhaps defensively, simply to restore their own reputation, but perhaps from guilt and remorse. This article will invite readers to think about reparation in terms of either fantasied wishfulness, or defensiveness, or its possible restorative capacity. My exploration rests on the premise that damage is always to the system and that both that which damages and that which is damaged suffer. It is in system restoration that hope re-emerges.","PeriodicalId":440453,"journal":{"name":"Twentieth Anniversary Special Issue","volume":"120 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Twentieth Anniversary Special Issue","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33212/osd.v21n1.2021.28","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Damage, physically and to the psyche is inevitable. This is whether it is caused unconsciously, through consciously malicious intent, thoughtlessness, as collateral or just through a hostile environment or the warring of internal forces. At the group or social level, the last few years have seen much damage in terms of economic recession, climate change, racial inequalities, and domestic violence. The desire to repair follows such damage. The psychoanalytic focus on reparation sees the process as an attempt by a person to repair perceived damage to another or, more precisely, to an internal image of the other—a loved other. Large groups such as organisations and societies also do damage and sometimes acknowledge this and make attempts to repair—perhaps defensively, simply to restore their own reputation, but perhaps from guilt and remorse. This article will invite readers to think about reparation in terms of either fantasied wishfulness, or defensiveness, or its possible restorative capacity. My exploration rests on the premise that damage is always to the system and that both that which damages and that which is damaged suffer. It is in system restoration that hope re-emerges.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
修复损害:一厢情愿,防御性,还是恢复性?
身体和精神上的伤害是不可避免的。无论它是无意识地,通过有意识的恶意意图,粗心大意,作为附带因素,还是仅仅通过敌对环境或内部力量的交战造成的。在群体或社会层面,过去几年在经济衰退、气候变化、种族不平等和家庭暴力方面受到了很大的损害。修复的愿望伴随着这样的破坏。精神分析专注于修复,将这个过程视为一个人试图修复对另一个人的感知伤害,或者更准确地说,修复对另一个人——所爱的人——的内在形象。像组织和社会这样的大团体也会造成损害,有时会承认这一点,并试图修复——也许是防御性的,只是为了恢复自己的声誉,但也许是出于内疚和悔恨。这篇文章将邀请读者从幻想的一厢情愿,或防御,或其可能的恢复能力的角度来思考赔偿。我的探索基于这样一个前提,即损害总是对系统造成的,损害者和被损害者都要遭受损失。正是在系统恢复过程中,希望重新浮现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Psychoanalytic, systems psychodynamic, socioanalytic, and group relations developments of the last two decades The exploring difference workshop: group relations methodology to deepen anti-racist education in Toronto, Canada Executive group coaching: interventions not for the faint of heart Lord of the flies: a psychoanalytic view of the gang and its processes Extending the Tavistock model: bringing desire, danger, dread, and excitement into a theory of organisational process
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1