Fault Tolerance Evaluation of Model-Free Controllers With Application To Unmanned Aerial Vehicles

M. Saied, Mohammad Kassem, H. Mazeh, H. Shraim, C. Francis
{"title":"Fault Tolerance Evaluation of Model-Free Controllers With Application To Unmanned Aerial Vehicles","authors":"M. Saied, Mohammad Kassem, H. Mazeh, H. Shraim, C. Francis","doi":"10.1139/dsa-2022-0048","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Although important improvements in the area of robust control of nonlinear systems have been presented in the literature, most of the developed controllers suffer from complexity and large dependency on accurate mathematical formulation of the models. Recently, model-free robust control techniques were introduced and have shown good performance when applied to multi-input multi-output systems. The model-free approach is characterized by the nonuse of any prior knowledge about the underlying structure and/or associated parameters of the dynamical system. Therefore, the major criteria for assessing the effectiveness of these controllers are related to their ability to handle unknown inputs and disturbances, as well as achieving the desired tracking performance in presence of faults and malfunctions. This work considers the development of robust fault-tolerant controllers based on the model-free approach and their application to multirotor unmanned aerial vehicles systems. The different controllers based on intelligent proportional-derivative (iPD), intelligent backstepping (iBackstepping) and adaptive control are compared in terms of performance, ease of implementation and parameters tuning. The simulated results, tested on Matlab/Simulink on a full nonlinear model of a hexarotor UAV, validate the theoretical advantages of the adaptive approach with respect to multiple criteria such as improved tracking performance in case of existence of actuators faults when compared to the iPD and iBackstepping control methods at the cost of increased complexity","PeriodicalId":202289,"journal":{"name":"Drone Systems and Applications","volume":"1 4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Drone Systems and Applications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1139/dsa-2022-0048","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Although important improvements in the area of robust control of nonlinear systems have been presented in the literature, most of the developed controllers suffer from complexity and large dependency on accurate mathematical formulation of the models. Recently, model-free robust control techniques were introduced and have shown good performance when applied to multi-input multi-output systems. The model-free approach is characterized by the nonuse of any prior knowledge about the underlying structure and/or associated parameters of the dynamical system. Therefore, the major criteria for assessing the effectiveness of these controllers are related to their ability to handle unknown inputs and disturbances, as well as achieving the desired tracking performance in presence of faults and malfunctions. This work considers the development of robust fault-tolerant controllers based on the model-free approach and their application to multirotor unmanned aerial vehicles systems. The different controllers based on intelligent proportional-derivative (iPD), intelligent backstepping (iBackstepping) and adaptive control are compared in terms of performance, ease of implementation and parameters tuning. The simulated results, tested on Matlab/Simulink on a full nonlinear model of a hexarotor UAV, validate the theoretical advantages of the adaptive approach with respect to multiple criteria such as improved tracking performance in case of existence of actuators faults when compared to the iPD and iBackstepping control methods at the cost of increased complexity
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
无模型控制器的容错评估及其在无人机上的应用
虽然在非线性系统鲁棒控制领域的重要改进已经在文献中提出,但大多数已开发的控制器都存在复杂性和对模型精确数学公式的依赖。近年来,无模型鲁棒控制技术被引入到多输入多输出系统中,并取得了良好的应用效果。无模型方法的特点是不使用任何关于动力系统底层结构和/或相关参数的先验知识。因此,评估这些控制器有效性的主要标准与它们处理未知输入和干扰的能力有关,以及在存在故障和故障的情况下实现所需的跟踪性能。本文研究了基于无模型方法的鲁棒容错控制器的发展及其在多旋翼无人机系统中的应用。比较了基于智能比例导数(iPD)、智能反步(iBackstepping)和自适应控制的不同控制器的性能、易实现性和参数整定性。仿真结果在Matlab/Simulink上对一架六旋翼无人机的全非线性模型进行了测试,验证了自适应方法在多个方面的理论优势,例如在执行器存在故障的情况下,与iPD和iBackstepping控制方法相比,该方法在增加复杂性的代价下提高了跟踪性能
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Capacity modelling for UAM Smart Data Harvesting in Cache-Enabled MANETs: UAVs, Future Position Prediction, and Autonomous Path Planning U-SMART: Unified Swarm Management and Resource Tracking Framework for Unoccupied Aerial Vehicles Swarm of Drones for Surveillance Monitoring of a Grounded Target: An event-triggered approach Three-Dimensional Path Planning and Collision-Free Flight Control for Drone-Assisted Autonomous Pollination Systems
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1