THE POLISH ADAPTATION OF THE BRIEF MEASURE OF RELATIONSHIP IMPORTANCE

K. Adamczyk, Agata Dębek, Dominika Kaczmarek, Nicola Łazarów, S. Pietrzak
{"title":"THE POLISH ADAPTATION OF THE BRIEF MEASURE OF RELATIONSHIP IMPORTANCE","authors":"K. Adamczyk, Agata Dębek, Dominika Kaczmarek, Nicola Łazarów, S. Pietrzak","doi":"10.36315/2022inpact052","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\"This paper presents the procedure of the Polish adaptation of the Brief Measure of Relationship Importance (BMRI; Watkins & Beckmeyer, 2020) designed to assess young adults’ beliefs about the values and costs of being in romantic relationships. The adaptation of the BMRI involved the following steps: 1) the translation of the original BMRI into the Polish language by three independent translators and the back-translation by three other independent translators; 2) the assessment of the equivalence of the Polish translation of BMRI in a study involving a sample of 38 bilingual university students and 3) the pilot study performed in a sample of 192 participants (144 women and 48 men aged 18-53 with a mean age of 26.35). The performed analyses provided evidence for the two-factor structure of the Polish BMRI with two factors – relationship desire and relationship dismissal (CFI = .94; TLI = .91, SRMR = .04; RMSEA = .10 [90% CI; .07, .14]), and satisfactory internal consistency of both subscales assessed using McDonald’s omega (.71 for relationship desire and .82 for relationship dismissal). No gender differences were observed in regard to relationship desire, F(1,190) = 0.51, p = .476 and relationship dismissal, F(1,190) = 3.13, p = .079. Furthermore, differences emerged between single and coupled individuals in the domain of relationship desire, F(1,190) = 64.73, p < .001 with single individuals reporting lower relationship desire than coupled individuals; and in the domain of relationship dismissal, F(1,190) = 57.43, p < .001 with single individuals reported higher relationship dismissal. In conclusion, the Polish version of the BMRI is a reliable measure of adult people’s romantic relationship attitudes, which requires further assessment.\"","PeriodicalId":120251,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Applications and Trends","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychological Applications and Trends","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36315/2022inpact052","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

"This paper presents the procedure of the Polish adaptation of the Brief Measure of Relationship Importance (BMRI; Watkins & Beckmeyer, 2020) designed to assess young adults’ beliefs about the values and costs of being in romantic relationships. The adaptation of the BMRI involved the following steps: 1) the translation of the original BMRI into the Polish language by three independent translators and the back-translation by three other independent translators; 2) the assessment of the equivalence of the Polish translation of BMRI in a study involving a sample of 38 bilingual university students and 3) the pilot study performed in a sample of 192 participants (144 women and 48 men aged 18-53 with a mean age of 26.35). The performed analyses provided evidence for the two-factor structure of the Polish BMRI with two factors – relationship desire and relationship dismissal (CFI = .94; TLI = .91, SRMR = .04; RMSEA = .10 [90% CI; .07, .14]), and satisfactory internal consistency of both subscales assessed using McDonald’s omega (.71 for relationship desire and .82 for relationship dismissal). No gender differences were observed in regard to relationship desire, F(1,190) = 0.51, p = .476 and relationship dismissal, F(1,190) = 3.13, p = .079. Furthermore, differences emerged between single and coupled individuals in the domain of relationship desire, F(1,190) = 64.73, p < .001 with single individuals reporting lower relationship desire than coupled individuals; and in the domain of relationship dismissal, F(1,190) = 57.43, p < .001 with single individuals reported higher relationship dismissal. In conclusion, the Polish version of the BMRI is a reliable measure of adult people’s romantic relationship attitudes, which requires further assessment."
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对关系重要性的简短度量的精雕细琢
本文介绍了关系重要性简要测量法(BMRI;Watkins & Beckmeyer, 2020),旨在评估年轻人对恋爱关系的价值和成本的看法。BMRI的改编包括以下几个步骤:1)由三名独立翻译人员将原BMRI翻译成波兰语,并由另外三名独立翻译人员进行反译;2)在38名双语大学生样本中评估BMRI波兰语翻译的等效性;3)在192名参与者样本中进行的试点研究(144名女性和48名男性,年龄18-53岁,平均年龄26.35岁)。所做的分析为波兰BMRI的两因素结构提供了证据,两因素-关系渴望和关系解雇(CFI = .94;Tli = .91, SRMR = .04;Rmsea = .10 [90% ci;.07, .14]),并且使用麦当劳的omega(。关系渴望为71分,关系解除为0.82分)。在关系渴望(F(1190) = 0.51, p = .476)和关系拒绝(F(1190) = 3.13, p = .079)方面没有性别差异。此外,单身个体与已婚个体在关系欲望方面存在差异,F(1190) = 64.73, p < 0.001,单身个体的关系欲望低于已婚个体;在关系解雇方面,F(1190) = 57.43, p < 0.001,单身个体的关系解雇率更高。总之,波兰版的BMRI是衡量成年人恋爱态度的可靠方法,这需要进一步的评估。”
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
LINKING MODAL AND AMODAL REPRESENTATIONS THROUGH LANGUAGE COMPUTATIONAL MODELS CLINICAL ASSESSMENT IN A PROFESSIONAL SETTING: ARE THERE IMPLICATIONS FOR SELF-REPORTS OF PSYCHOPATHOLOGY? MALADAPTIVE COGNITIONS AND EMOTIONAL REGULATION IN PTSD DOES VACCINE SCARCITY INFLUENCE THE EFFECT OF CONSPIRACY BELIEFS ON INTENTION TO VACCINATE AGAINST COVID-19? SOURCES OF TRANSITION-TO-WORK SELF-EFFICACY: CAREER EXPLORATION AND SOCIAL SUPPORT
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1