Exploring the gender gap in achievement in Malaysia: a case for learning styles

Nadia Ainuddin Dahlan, N. Noor, Sharifah Muzlia Syed Mustafa, Khadijah Said Hashim, Voviana Zulkifli
{"title":"Exploring the gender gap in achievement in Malaysia: a case for learning styles","authors":"Nadia Ainuddin Dahlan, N. Noor, Sharifah Muzlia Syed Mustafa, Khadijah Said Hashim, Voviana Zulkifli","doi":"10.18848/1447-9494/CGP/V17I04/46997","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"a common problem shared by many institution of higher learning around the world today is the wide discrepancy in the enrollment of males and females.although the gender gap inpublic universities has been widely highlited in malaysia.it is believed this problem may be inextricably linked to gender differences in achievement at the school level.it has been suggested that accommodating gender differences in learning styles in school could help bridge the gender gap.therefore,this study attempted to identify the extent of the gender gap by comparing the self-reported results of a national standardized test,the lower secondary examination or penilaian menengah rendah(PMR) of 411 form four students from four secondary schools in kuala lumpur.respiondents also completed the felder and soloman (1991) index of learning styles(ILS)which determined their learning styles on four subscales:active-reflective, sensing-intuitive, visual-verbal and sequential-global.the study found a significant gender difference in achievement but not for learning styles.the majority of respondent were active,visual and sequential-global.the study found a significant gender difference in achievement but not for learning styles.the majority of respondents were active,visual and sequential.however,a binary logistic regression model found gender,sensing and visual learning styles to be significant predictors of achievement.therefore,accommodating these learning styles in particular,may promote the academic achievement of students.future teachers should consequently be equipped with practical knowledge of learning styles in the hope of increasing achievement across genders,thus narrowing the gender gap in schools and lead to more gender-balanced university classrooms capable of nurturing quality human capital amongst both women and men.","PeriodicalId":305287,"journal":{"name":"The International Journal of Learning: Annual Review","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The International Journal of Learning: Annual Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18848/1447-9494/CGP/V17I04/46997","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

a common problem shared by many institution of higher learning around the world today is the wide discrepancy in the enrollment of males and females.although the gender gap inpublic universities has been widely highlited in malaysia.it is believed this problem may be inextricably linked to gender differences in achievement at the school level.it has been suggested that accommodating gender differences in learning styles in school could help bridge the gender gap.therefore,this study attempted to identify the extent of the gender gap by comparing the self-reported results of a national standardized test,the lower secondary examination or penilaian menengah rendah(PMR) of 411 form four students from four secondary schools in kuala lumpur.respiondents also completed the felder and soloman (1991) index of learning styles(ILS)which determined their learning styles on four subscales:active-reflective, sensing-intuitive, visual-verbal and sequential-global.the study found a significant gender difference in achievement but not for learning styles.the majority of respondent were active,visual and sequential-global.the study found a significant gender difference in achievement but not for learning styles.the majority of respondents were active,visual and sequential.however,a binary logistic regression model found gender,sensing and visual learning styles to be significant predictors of achievement.therefore,accommodating these learning styles in particular,may promote the academic achievement of students.future teachers should consequently be equipped with practical knowledge of learning styles in the hope of increasing achievement across genders,thus narrowing the gender gap in schools and lead to more gender-balanced university classrooms capable of nurturing quality human capital amongst both women and men.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
探讨马来西亚学业成绩的性别差异:以学习方式为例
当今世界上许多高等院校面临的一个共同问题是男女入学人数的巨大差异。尽管马来西亚公立大学的性别差距已经被广泛强调。据信,这一问题可能与学校成绩的性别差异有着千丝万缕的联系。有人建议,在学校里适应学习方式的性别差异可以帮助弥合性别差距。因此,本研究试图通过比较来自吉隆坡四所中学的411名四年级学生的国家标准化考试、初中考试或penilaian menengah rendah(PMR)的自我报告结果来确定性别差距的程度。被调查者还完成了felder and soloman(1991)学习风格指数(ILS),该指数在四个子尺度上确定了他们的学习风格:主动反思、感觉直觉、视觉语言和顺序全局。研究发现,在成绩上存在显著的性别差异,但在学习方式上却没有。大多数被调查者是活跃的、视觉的和顺序全局的。研究发现,在成绩上存在显著的性别差异,但在学习方式上却没有。大多数受访者是主动的、视觉的和顺序的。然而,二元逻辑回归模型发现性别、感觉和视觉学习风格是成绩的重要预测因素。因此,特别适应这些学习方式,可能会促进学生的学业成绩。因此,未来的教师应该具备学习方式的实用知识,以期提高男女之间的成就,从而缩小学校中的性别差距,并导致更多性别平衡的大学教室,能够培养男女之间的优质人力资本。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Project Work to Motivate Learning Improving the quality of teaching and learning: A teacher-as-learner-centred approach Integrated Curriculum: Elaboration Learning for Students Unpacking tertiary students' communication apprehension in malaysia: Pedagogical implications for future employment Assessing readiness for lifelong learning: volunteers to A 4-H youth development program
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1