The Economic Consequences and Strategies of the US-China Trade War on Indonesia: A GTAP Simulation Analysis

Muhammad Rizal Taufikurahman, A. Firdaus
{"title":"The Economic Consequences and Strategies of the US-China Trade War on Indonesia: A GTAP Simulation Analysis","authors":"Muhammad Rizal Taufikurahman, A. Firdaus","doi":"10.2991/icot-19.2019.22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"At present, the world economy is in uncertainty. One reason is that two economically large countries, the United States (US) and China are in conflict and beat the drums of trade war. This is indicated by the policy of US applying tariffs on a number of Chinese products, and then responded very quickly by China by implementing a reply tariff. The aim of this study is to analyze the economic consequences of the USChina trade war for Indonesia and Indonesia's strategies to respond to the trade war. The analytical method used is the Global Trade Analysis Project (GTAP) model. The results of the analysis show that the consequences of the US-China trade war on the found that trade wars between the US and China had an impact on the decline in the total output of goods produced by the US and China by 3.91% and 2.67% respectively. But the economic growth (PDB) of the US and China will be corrected by 0.08% and 0.66% respectively. Exports are still affected by -0.24% with greater implications. It means Indonesia has not been able to take advantage of the situation as a source of economic growth (GDP) projected to only increase by 0.01%. This means that Indonesia also needs to improve, so that investment in the real sector continues to flow profusely even though the China-US trade war has not been completed. The recommendation suggested that in the short-term strategies that need to be done are increasing export competitiveness, encouraging export-oriented industrial productivity, expanding and strengthening domestic and world markets, and controlling the amount of imports. In the longterm strategies include the need to improve the quality of human resources in the trade and industry sectors, utilization of the results of research and development, and infrastructure development is right on target for increased productivity. Keywords—economic impacts, strategies, US-China trade war, GTAP analysis","PeriodicalId":229902,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the International Conference on Trade 2019 (ICOT 2019)","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the International Conference on Trade 2019 (ICOT 2019)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2991/icot-19.2019.22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

At present, the world economy is in uncertainty. One reason is that two economically large countries, the United States (US) and China are in conflict and beat the drums of trade war. This is indicated by the policy of US applying tariffs on a number of Chinese products, and then responded very quickly by China by implementing a reply tariff. The aim of this study is to analyze the economic consequences of the USChina trade war for Indonesia and Indonesia's strategies to respond to the trade war. The analytical method used is the Global Trade Analysis Project (GTAP) model. The results of the analysis show that the consequences of the US-China trade war on the found that trade wars between the US and China had an impact on the decline in the total output of goods produced by the US and China by 3.91% and 2.67% respectively. But the economic growth (PDB) of the US and China will be corrected by 0.08% and 0.66% respectively. Exports are still affected by -0.24% with greater implications. It means Indonesia has not been able to take advantage of the situation as a source of economic growth (GDP) projected to only increase by 0.01%. This means that Indonesia also needs to improve, so that investment in the real sector continues to flow profusely even though the China-US trade war has not been completed. The recommendation suggested that in the short-term strategies that need to be done are increasing export competitiveness, encouraging export-oriented industrial productivity, expanding and strengthening domestic and world markets, and controlling the amount of imports. In the longterm strategies include the need to improve the quality of human resources in the trade and industry sectors, utilization of the results of research and development, and infrastructure development is right on target for increased productivity. Keywords—economic impacts, strategies, US-China trade war, GTAP analysis
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
中美贸易战对印尼的经济后果及对策——基于GTAP的模拟分析
当前,世界经济充满不确定性。一个原因是美国和中国这两个经济大国发生冲突,敲起了贸易战的鼓。美国对一些中国产品征收关税的政策表明了这一点,然后中国很快就通过实施回应关税做出了回应。本研究的目的是分析中美贸易战对印尼的经济后果以及印尼应对贸易战的策略。使用的分析方法是全球贸易分析项目(GTAP)模型。分析结果表明,中美贸易战对经济的影响发现,中美贸易战对中美两国商品生产总量的影响分别下降了3.91%和2.67%。但美国和中国的经济增长(PDB)将分别修正0.08%和0.66%。出口仍受-0.24%的影响,影响更大。这意味着印尼未能利用这一形势作为经济增长(GDP)的来源,预计仅增长0.01%。这意味着印尼也需要改善,以便在中美贸易战尚未结束的情况下,实体部门的投资继续大量流动。该建议指出,需要采取的短期战略是提高出口竞争力,鼓励面向出口的工业生产力,扩大和加强国内和世界市场,以及控制进口额。长期战略包括需要提高贸易和工业部门人力资源的质量,利用研究和发展的成果,发展基础设施正符合提高生产力的目标。关键词:经济影响,战略,中美贸易战,GTAP分析
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Effective Business Strategy: Key to Winning Business Competition in Industrial Estate Price Transmission in International Crude Palm Oil Markets: The Effects of Export Tax of Indonesia The Impact of Aircraft Spare Parts Import Duty Exemption on the MRO Industry's Competitiveness and Its Services Export Determinants of Indonesian Gold Export to Singapore in 2006-2017 Family Business in Agriculture: Challenge and Strategy to Face Global Business
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1