Personal Loan Agreement Between Small Traders and “Bank Plecit” at Traditional Market Banyumas, Central Java; A Study from the Perspective of Moral Judgement

Ratna Kartikawati, Z. Osman
{"title":"Personal Loan Agreement Between Small Traders and “Bank Plecit” at Traditional Market Banyumas, Central Java; A Study from the Perspective of Moral Judgement","authors":"Ratna Kartikawati, Z. Osman","doi":"10.30595/kosmikhukum.v21i2.10421","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In Indonesia, it has found that small traders are still borrowing money from ‘bank plecit’ or known as loan shark although they know the risks of borrowing money from them. This happens because they are financially desperate and very little documentation is required. This study aims to explore the experiences and understandings (cognitive) of small traders and ‘bank plecit’ at Traditional Market, Bayumas, Jogjakarta from the moral judgement perspective that has influenced their personal loan agreement process. Seven ‘bank plecit’ and nine small traders from Traditonal Market, Bayumas, Puworkerto were selected for this study. A qualitative approach using one to one in-depth interview method and observation were used to gather the primary data. The findings show that small traders have a clear understanding of the risk of paying a high-interest rates when they decided to borrow money from ‘bank plecit’.  Several reasons are given by both group of respondents in the area of moral judgement decision-making based on a cognitive view that can be considered as internal and external factors. For the small traders, the internal factors are related with them such as responsibility to family so that they can get out of the financial crisis easily and belief in God when they surrender with their life's hardships. While external factors show that small traders believe that it’s a rational decision because the loan process and procedures from the ‘bank plecit’ is often faster and easier than the legal banks that they considered as so straight. They considered that borrowing money from the ‘bank plecit’ was their best rational decision they can made in order to get capital for their business and for their survival. For the ‘bank plecit’, they are only concerned about profits when they agreed to lend the money to small traders, but they said that helping small traders is their responsibility. In addition, they also aware of setting high rate interest to the small traders, they assume that is the way they are helping small traders as the small traders desperately need money. They believed that cognitively, decision that they have made is right because they will help the small traders to start or continue their business. Overall, this study found that moral judgement in cognitive made by both group of respondents are based on their personal situations and lives. Keywords: moral judgement, cognitive, ‘bank plecit’, personal loan agreement","PeriodicalId":197254,"journal":{"name":"Kosmik Hukum","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kosmik Hukum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30595/kosmikhukum.v21i2.10421","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In Indonesia, it has found that small traders are still borrowing money from ‘bank plecit’ or known as loan shark although they know the risks of borrowing money from them. This happens because they are financially desperate and very little documentation is required. This study aims to explore the experiences and understandings (cognitive) of small traders and ‘bank plecit’ at Traditional Market, Bayumas, Jogjakarta from the moral judgement perspective that has influenced their personal loan agreement process. Seven ‘bank plecit’ and nine small traders from Traditonal Market, Bayumas, Puworkerto were selected for this study. A qualitative approach using one to one in-depth interview method and observation were used to gather the primary data. The findings show that small traders have a clear understanding of the risk of paying a high-interest rates when they decided to borrow money from ‘bank plecit’.  Several reasons are given by both group of respondents in the area of moral judgement decision-making based on a cognitive view that can be considered as internal and external factors. For the small traders, the internal factors are related with them such as responsibility to family so that they can get out of the financial crisis easily and belief in God when they surrender with their life's hardships. While external factors show that small traders believe that it’s a rational decision because the loan process and procedures from the ‘bank plecit’ is often faster and easier than the legal banks that they considered as so straight. They considered that borrowing money from the ‘bank plecit’ was their best rational decision they can made in order to get capital for their business and for their survival. For the ‘bank plecit’, they are only concerned about profits when they agreed to lend the money to small traders, but they said that helping small traders is their responsibility. In addition, they also aware of setting high rate interest to the small traders, they assume that is the way they are helping small traders as the small traders desperately need money. They believed that cognitively, decision that they have made is right because they will help the small traders to start or continue their business. Overall, this study found that moral judgement in cognitive made by both group of respondents are based on their personal situations and lives. Keywords: moral judgement, cognitive, ‘bank plecit’, personal loan agreement
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
中爪哇Banyumas传统市场小商贩与“银行信贷”个人贷款协议道德判断视角下的研究
在印度尼西亚,该机构发现,尽管小商人知道从“银行骗子”那里借钱的风险,但他们仍在向“高利贷者”借钱。这是因为他们在经济上很绝望,而且几乎不需要什么文件。本研究旨在从道德判断的角度探讨雅加达巴尤马斯传统市场的小商贩和“银行会员”的经验和理解(认知),这些经验和理解影响了他们的个人贷款协议过程。本研究选择了来自传统市场,巴尤马斯,普沃克托的7名“银行居民”和9名小商人。采用一对一深度访谈法和观察法进行定性分析,收集主要数据。研究结果表明,当小商人决定从“银行贷款”中借钱时,他们清楚地了解支付高利率的风险。在基于认知观点的道德判断决策领域,两组受访者给出了几个理由,这些认知观点可以被视为内部和外部因素。对于小商贩来说,内在因素与他们有关,如家庭责任,使他们能够轻松走出金融危机,并在他们屈服于生活的艰辛时信仰上帝。而外部因素显示,小交易员认为这是一个理性的决定,因为“银行信贷”的贷款流程和程序往往比他们认为如此直接的合法银行更快、更容易。他们认为,从“银行贷款”中借钱是他们能做出的最理性的决定,以便为他们的业务和生存获得资金。对于“银行股民”来说,当他们同意把钱借给小商人时,他们只关心利润,但他们说帮助小商人是他们的责任。此外,他们也意识到为小交易者设定高利率,他们认为这是他们帮助小交易者的方式,因为小交易者迫切需要钱。他们从认知上认为,他们所做的决定是正确的,因为他们将帮助小商人开始或继续他们的生意。总体而言,本研究发现两组受访者的认知道德判断都是基于他们的个人情况和生活。关键词:道德判断,认知,“银行契约”,个人贷款协议
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Indonesian-British Strategic Partnership in the Perspective of International Treaty Law Malaysia’s Indisputable Sovereignty Over Sabah Intellectual Property Based Financing: Juridical Review of Government Regulation Number 24 of 2022 And Relevance of Establishing Intellectual Property Rights Appraisal Institution Interpreting the Material Requirements of Recidivism: Realizing Restorative Justice in the Police Force Judicial Transformation: Integration of AI Judges in Innovating Indonesia's Criminal Justice System
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1