Thermal and energy analysis of ceiling and pitch insulation for buildings in Malaysia

Noor Hafizah Abdul Halim, A. Z. Ahmed, N. Zakaria
{"title":"Thermal and energy analysis of ceiling and pitch insulation for buildings in Malaysia","authors":"Noor Hafizah Abdul Halim, A. Z. Ahmed, N. Zakaria","doi":"10.1109/ISESEE.2011.5977092","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of this study is to investigate the benefits of pitch insulation and ceiling insulation for air-conditioned buildings in the tropical climate of Malaysia. These are performed via computer simulations using a whole-building thermal energy software Integrated Environmental Solution (IES) with Apache Sim 6.0.2. The benefits are appraised by the thermal impact and the cooling load in three cooling modes due to the pitch insulation and ceiling insulation. The three cooling modes are 24-hr cooling, daytime and night-time cooling. The simulation is performed using the Subang weather data for the month of March that represents the hottest month in typical year weather data in Malaysia. Results show that advantage and the disadvantage of the insulation are more evident in the attic than in the indoor space underneath the ceiling. Compared to the non-insulated roof, pitch insulation reduces the daytime attic temperature up to 6.9°C but only about 0.4°C for the indoor. On the contrary, ceiling insulation elevates daytime attic temperature up to 2.2 °C but lowers the indoor temperature up to 0.8°C. Both insulations create adverse temporal effect in both spaces, however the advantage outweighs the disadvantage. Despite nominal thermal improvements, the month savings on the cooling load of about 6–24 % is noteworthy.","PeriodicalId":105476,"journal":{"name":"2011 3rd International Symposium & Exhibition in Sustainable Energy & Environment (ISESEE)","volume":"58 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2011 3rd International Symposium & Exhibition in Sustainable Energy & Environment (ISESEE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISESEE.2011.5977092","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

The aim of this study is to investigate the benefits of pitch insulation and ceiling insulation for air-conditioned buildings in the tropical climate of Malaysia. These are performed via computer simulations using a whole-building thermal energy software Integrated Environmental Solution (IES) with Apache Sim 6.0.2. The benefits are appraised by the thermal impact and the cooling load in three cooling modes due to the pitch insulation and ceiling insulation. The three cooling modes are 24-hr cooling, daytime and night-time cooling. The simulation is performed using the Subang weather data for the month of March that represents the hottest month in typical year weather data in Malaysia. Results show that advantage and the disadvantage of the insulation are more evident in the attic than in the indoor space underneath the ceiling. Compared to the non-insulated roof, pitch insulation reduces the daytime attic temperature up to 6.9°C but only about 0.4°C for the indoor. On the contrary, ceiling insulation elevates daytime attic temperature up to 2.2 °C but lowers the indoor temperature up to 0.8°C. Both insulations create adverse temporal effect in both spaces, however the advantage outweighs the disadvantage. Despite nominal thermal improvements, the month savings on the cooling load of about 6–24 % is noteworthy.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
马来西亚建筑物天花板和沥青绝热材料的热能分析
本研究的目的是调查沥青绝缘和天花板绝缘的空调建筑在马来西亚的热带气候的好处。这些都是通过使用带有Apache Sim 6.0.2的整个建筑热能软件集成环境解决方案(IES)的计算机模拟进行的。通过对沥青保温和吊顶保温三种冷却方式的热影响和冷负荷进行评价。三种冷却模式是24小时冷却,白天和夜间冷却。模拟是使用三月份的Subang天气数据执行的,三月份代表了马来西亚典型年份天气数据中最热的月份。结果表明,阁楼隔热的优点和缺点比天花板下的室内空间更为明显。与不保温的屋顶相比,沥青保温将白天阁楼的温度降低了6.9°C,而室内的温度仅降低了0.4°C左右。相反,天花板隔热层使阁楼白天的温度升高2.2°C,但使室内温度降低0.8°C。两种绝缘在两个空间中都会产生不利的时间效应,但优点大于缺点。尽管名义上的热改进,每月节省的冷却负荷约6 - 24%是值得注意的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Training transfer: Training characteristic, training design and work environment evaluation Carbon dioxide sequestration at elevated temperature by pressure swing adsorption Performance analysis of 45.36 kWp grid-connected photovoltaic systems at Malaysia Green Technology Corporation Multitrophic system: Effect of different concentration of nutrient and pre-infested brinjal (Solanum melongena) on whitefly (Bemisia tabaci) population Screw-fixing damages and screw-holding performance in particleboard exposed to the kitchen environment in the selected area of Kuala Lumpur and Selangor
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1