Re-Examining the Use of Inclusive Society as a Solution to Social Inequalities: It’s Time we Address the Elephants in the House

E. E. Obisike, Justina N. Adalikwu-Obisike, Cheyanne Romeo, D’von Cox, Tracy-Ann Adjei
{"title":"Re-Examining the Use of Inclusive Society as a Solution to Social Inequalities: It’s Time we Address the Elephants in the House","authors":"E. E. Obisike, Justina N. Adalikwu-Obisike, Cheyanne Romeo, D’von Cox, Tracy-Ann Adjei","doi":"10.36941/jicd-2023-0002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Social inclusion is one of the many social constructs of contemporary governments’ social integration policy. This paper critically analysed the policy goals of an inclusive society by examining the socioeconomic and politico-cultural milieus in which governments implement this policy. With references to the United States’ Affirmative Action and Canada’s Multiculturalism, one can infer that disadvantaged individuals, groups, or communities are neither included nor empowered through the processes of social inclusion. Consequently, this paper concluded that the process of social inclusion cannot lead to effective social integration, given the stagnant socio-economic and politico-cultural environments in which government implements this policy. Instead, most social inclusion programs have become the tools for forced social cohesion with minimal policy objectives to integrate disadvantaged individuals into mainstream society. In summary, social inclusion is a politically correct opiate that is being used to sedate socially excluded individuals or underprivileged communities until they disappear into obscurity. \n  \nReceived: 4 January 2023 / Accepted: 26 February 2023 / Published: 6 March 2023","PeriodicalId":302999,"journal":{"name":"Journal of International Cooperation and Development","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of International Cooperation and Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36941/jicd-2023-0002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Social inclusion is one of the many social constructs of contemporary governments’ social integration policy. This paper critically analysed the policy goals of an inclusive society by examining the socioeconomic and politico-cultural milieus in which governments implement this policy. With references to the United States’ Affirmative Action and Canada’s Multiculturalism, one can infer that disadvantaged individuals, groups, or communities are neither included nor empowered through the processes of social inclusion. Consequently, this paper concluded that the process of social inclusion cannot lead to effective social integration, given the stagnant socio-economic and politico-cultural environments in which government implements this policy. Instead, most social inclusion programs have become the tools for forced social cohesion with minimal policy objectives to integrate disadvantaged individuals into mainstream society. In summary, social inclusion is a politically correct opiate that is being used to sedate socially excluded individuals or underprivileged communities until they disappear into obscurity.   Received: 4 January 2023 / Accepted: 26 February 2023 / Published: 6 March 2023
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
重新审视包容性社会作为社会不平等解决方案的使用:是时候解决家里的大象了
社会包容是当代政府社会整合政策的诸多社会建构之一。本文通过考察政府实施这一政策的社会经济和政治文化环境,批判性地分析了包容性社会的政策目标。参考美国的平权行动和加拿大的多元文化主义,我们可以推断,在社会包容的过程中,弱势个人、群体或社区既没有被包括在内,也没有被赋予权力。因此,本文得出结论,鉴于政府实施这一政策的停滞的社会经济和政治文化环境,社会包容的过程不能导致有效的社会整合。相反,大多数社会包容项目已经成为强制社会凝聚力的工具,其政策目标是将弱势群体融入主流社会。总而言之,社会包容是一种政治上正确的鸦片,被用来使被社会排斥的个人或弱势群体平静下来,直到他们消失在默默无闻的境地。收稿日期:2023年1月4日/收稿日期:2023年2月26日/发表日期:2023年3月6日
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Development Partner Involvement in Policy Lab Creation Analyzed Through Brazil’s “MindLab Project” Availability and Accessibility of Digital Record Keeping among University Administrators in Nigeria Assessment of Government Liberalization Policy and the Growth in Nigeria’s Trade Industry Financial Management Strategies and the Sustainability of Small-Scale Business in River State Public Universities, Nigeria Trade Competition and Complementarity Between USA and One of Its Major Trading Partners in Africa (Nigeria): An Empirical Analysis Using Prominent International Trade Measures
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1