Dimensional Role Analysis: The Role of Humans and Automation for Increasingly Autonomous Aviation Systems

A. Lacher, L. Ren, D. Maroney, Christopher Schulenberg, Jonathan Daniels
{"title":"Dimensional Role Analysis: The Role of Humans and Automation for Increasingly Autonomous Aviation Systems","authors":"A. Lacher, L. Ren, D. Maroney, Christopher Schulenberg, Jonathan Daniels","doi":"10.1109/ICNS58246.2023.10124260","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, we discuss an analysis method to describe the human and automation roles in increasingly autonomous aviation systems. Specifically, we discuss the relationship between humans and automation in the performance of individual functions in two dimensions, related to their responsibility and authority for the control loops associated with an individual intended function. This work builds upon concepts and terminology proposed by ASTM International in Autonomy Design and Operations in Aviation: Terminology and Requirements Framework (TR1) published in 2019 and is based in part on the on-going work of an ASTM Working Group (WK76044) under F39 Aircraft Systems. TR1 presented a Contextual Framework for analysis of automated aviation functions, and the working group is developing a practice for its implementation.The role of the human vs. the role of automation, which has been extensively discussed in the past, is fundamental to the implementation of the Contextual Framework. As such, it is worth a fresh look, particularly against the backdrop of the Contextual Framework. Our work has led to an analysis of the system state, which at any given time is defined by the role of the human and the role of automation in a two-dimensional space. We refer to this as Dimensional Role Analysis which uses a directed graph approach to clearly depict the nominal operating mode, the revisionary modes, and the triggering events that would cause transition. The analysis approach helps to establish clear delineations as to the responsibility and authority of humans and automation in the performance of individual intended functions. This work makes a clear distinction between authority, responsibility, and accountability consistent with the work of ASTM.Using the concepts and language presented in this paper could add clarity to discussions in the aviation community, as proponents seek to certify and obtain operational approval for increasingly autonomous systems in aviation. While this paper focuses on aircraft control, these approaches could also apply to other safety critical systems.","PeriodicalId":103699,"journal":{"name":"2023 Integrated Communication, Navigation and Surveillance Conference (ICNS)","volume":"43 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2023 Integrated Communication, Navigation and Surveillance Conference (ICNS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICNS58246.2023.10124260","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this paper, we discuss an analysis method to describe the human and automation roles in increasingly autonomous aviation systems. Specifically, we discuss the relationship between humans and automation in the performance of individual functions in two dimensions, related to their responsibility and authority for the control loops associated with an individual intended function. This work builds upon concepts and terminology proposed by ASTM International in Autonomy Design and Operations in Aviation: Terminology and Requirements Framework (TR1) published in 2019 and is based in part on the on-going work of an ASTM Working Group (WK76044) under F39 Aircraft Systems. TR1 presented a Contextual Framework for analysis of automated aviation functions, and the working group is developing a practice for its implementation.The role of the human vs. the role of automation, which has been extensively discussed in the past, is fundamental to the implementation of the Contextual Framework. As such, it is worth a fresh look, particularly against the backdrop of the Contextual Framework. Our work has led to an analysis of the system state, which at any given time is defined by the role of the human and the role of automation in a two-dimensional space. We refer to this as Dimensional Role Analysis which uses a directed graph approach to clearly depict the nominal operating mode, the revisionary modes, and the triggering events that would cause transition. The analysis approach helps to establish clear delineations as to the responsibility and authority of humans and automation in the performance of individual intended functions. This work makes a clear distinction between authority, responsibility, and accountability consistent with the work of ASTM.Using the concepts and language presented in this paper could add clarity to discussions in the aviation community, as proponents seek to certify and obtain operational approval for increasingly autonomous systems in aviation. While this paper focuses on aircraft control, these approaches could also apply to other safety critical systems.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
维度角色分析:人类和自动化在日益自主的航空系统中的作用
在本文中,我们讨论了一种分析方法来描述日益自治的航空系统中的人和自动化角色。具体来说,我们在两个维度上讨论了人与自动化在单个功能执行中的关系,涉及到他们对与单个预期功能相关的控制回路的责任和权限。这项工作建立在ASTM国际在2019年发布的航空自主设计和操作:术语和要求框架(TR1)中提出的概念和术语的基础上,部分基于ASTM工作组(WK76044)在F39飞机系统下正在进行的工作。TR1提出了分析自动化航空功能的上下文框架,工作组正在制定实施该框架的实践。人的角色与自动化的角色,这在过去已经被广泛讨论过,是上下文框架实现的基础。因此,它值得重新审视,特别是在上下文框架的背景下。我们的工作导致了对系统状态的分析,在任何给定的时间,系统状态都是由二维空间中的人类角色和自动化角色定义的。我们将此称为维度角色分析,它使用有向图方法来清楚地描述标称操作模式、修正模式和导致转换的触发事件。分析方法有助于建立关于人的责任和权限以及执行单个预期功能的自动化的清晰描述。这项工作明确区分了与ASTM工作一致的权威、责任和问责制。使用本文中提出的概念和语言可以增加航空界讨论的清晰度,因为支持者寻求认证并获得航空中日益自治的系统的运营批准。虽然本文的重点是飞机控制,但这些方法也可以应用于其他安全关键系统。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Tracking Performance Analysis of Ground-Based Radar Networks for Urban Air Mobility Noise Measurements of Unmanned Aircraft Vehicles: Experiences, Challenges and Recommendations for Standards taken from Flight Trials BB-Planner: an urban traffic dataset generation tool Conceptual Analysis of Allocation Strategies for Air Traffic Control Concepts without Conventional Sector Boundaries Flight Testing Drone Contingencies during Runway Inspection in U-space Shared Airspace
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1