Understanding Code Smells in Android Applications

Umme Ayda Mannan, Iftekhar Ahmed, Rana Abdullah M. Almurshed, Danny Dig, Carlos Jensen
{"title":"Understanding Code Smells in Android Applications","authors":"Umme Ayda Mannan, Iftekhar Ahmed, Rana Abdullah M. Almurshed, Danny Dig, Carlos Jensen","doi":"10.1145/2897073.2897094","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Code smells are associated with poor coding practices that cause long-term maintainability problems and mask bugs. Despite mobile being a fast growing software sector, code smells in mobile applications have been understudied. We do not know how code smells in mobile applications compare to those in desktop applications, and how code smells are affecting the design of mobile applications. Without such knowledge, application developers, tool builders, and researchers cannot improve the practice and state of the art of mobile development.We first reviewed the literature on code smells in Android applications and found that there is a significant gap between the most studied code smells in literature and most frequently occurring code smells in real world applications. Inspired by this finding, we conducted a large scale empirical study to compare the type, density, and distribution of code smells in mobile vs. desktop applications. We analyze an open-source corpus of 500 Android applications (total of 6.7M LOC) and 750 desktop Java applications (total of 16M LOC), and compare 14,553 instances of code smells in Android applications to 117,557 instances of code smells in desktop applications. We find that, despite mobile applications having different structure and workflow than desktop applications, the variety and density of code smells is similar. However, the distribution of code smells is different – some code smells occur more frequently in mobile applications. We also found that different categories of Android applications have different code smell distributions. We highlight several implications of our study for application developers, tool builders, and researchers.","PeriodicalId":296509,"journal":{"name":"2016 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Mobile Software Engineering and Systems (MOBILESoft)","volume":"112 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"66","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Mobile Software Engineering and Systems (MOBILESoft)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2897073.2897094","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 66

Abstract

Code smells are associated with poor coding practices that cause long-term maintainability problems and mask bugs. Despite mobile being a fast growing software sector, code smells in mobile applications have been understudied. We do not know how code smells in mobile applications compare to those in desktop applications, and how code smells are affecting the design of mobile applications. Without such knowledge, application developers, tool builders, and researchers cannot improve the practice and state of the art of mobile development.We first reviewed the literature on code smells in Android applications and found that there is a significant gap between the most studied code smells in literature and most frequently occurring code smells in real world applications. Inspired by this finding, we conducted a large scale empirical study to compare the type, density, and distribution of code smells in mobile vs. desktop applications. We analyze an open-source corpus of 500 Android applications (total of 6.7M LOC) and 750 desktop Java applications (total of 16M LOC), and compare 14,553 instances of code smells in Android applications to 117,557 instances of code smells in desktop applications. We find that, despite mobile applications having different structure and workflow than desktop applications, the variety and density of code smells is similar. However, the distribution of code smells is different – some code smells occur more frequently in mobile applications. We also found that different categories of Android applications have different code smell distributions. We highlight several implications of our study for application developers, tool builders, and researchers.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
理解Android应用程序中的代码气味
代码气味与导致长期可维护性问题和掩盖bug的不良编码实践有关。尽管移动是一个快速增长的软件部门,但移动应用程序中的代码气味一直没有得到充分的研究。我们不知道移动应用程序中的代码气味与桌面应用程序中的代码气味相比如何,也不知道代码气味如何影响移动应用程序的设计。没有这些知识,应用程序开发人员、工具构建者和研究人员就无法改进移动开发的实践和状态。我们首先回顾了有关Android应用程序中代码气味的文献,发现文献中研究最多的代码气味与实际应用程序中最常见的代码气味之间存在显著差距。受此发现的启发,我们进行了一项大规模的实证研究,以比较移动和桌面应用程序中代码气味的类型、密度和分布。我们分析了500个Android应用程序(总共6.7M LOC)和750个桌面Java应用程序(总共16M LOC)的开源语料,并比较了Android应用程序中的14,553个代码气味实例和桌面应用程序中的117,557个代码气味实例。我们发现,尽管移动应用程序的结构和工作流程与桌面应用程序不同,但代码气味的种类和密度是相似的。然而,代码气味的分布是不同的——一些代码气味在移动应用程序中更频繁地出现。我们还发现,不同类别的Android应用程序有不同的代码气味分布。我们为应用程序开发人员、工具构建者和研究人员强调了我们的研究的几个含义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Preserving Energy Resources Using an Android Kernel Extension: A Case Study Comparing Performance Parameters of Mobile App Development Strategies VALERA: An Effective and Efficient Record-and-Replay Tool for Android Mobile Exergaming: Exergames on the Go Model Under Design and Over Design on Mobile Applications
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1