Cities Through the Ages: One Thing or Many?

Michael E. Smith, J. Lobo
{"title":"Cities Through the Ages: One Thing or Many?","authors":"Michael E. Smith, J. Lobo","doi":"10.3389/fdigh.2019.00012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The variability among cities, from the ancient world to the present, can be organized usefully in two ways. First, a focus on the dominant urban activities and processes leads to the recognition of two basic urban types: economic cities and political cities. Most cities today are economic cities in which growth proceeds through agglomeration processes. By contrast, most cities in the ancient world (and some today) are political cities, in which power and administration play a major role in structuring cities and generating change. Second, an alternative focus on processes of social interaction within the urban built environment leads to the recognition that there is only one kind of settlement that includes all cities—economic and political; past and present. Cities in this sense are settings for “energized crowding.” Processes of interaction generate both economic and political growth, and they produce and influence the built forms and social characteristics of all cities. Our model helps scholars distinguish the unique from the universal traits of cities today and in the past.","PeriodicalId":227954,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers Digit. Humanit.","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers Digit. Humanit.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fdigh.2019.00012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

The variability among cities, from the ancient world to the present, can be organized usefully in two ways. First, a focus on the dominant urban activities and processes leads to the recognition of two basic urban types: economic cities and political cities. Most cities today are economic cities in which growth proceeds through agglomeration processes. By contrast, most cities in the ancient world (and some today) are political cities, in which power and administration play a major role in structuring cities and generating change. Second, an alternative focus on processes of social interaction within the urban built environment leads to the recognition that there is only one kind of settlement that includes all cities—economic and political; past and present. Cities in this sense are settings for “energized crowding.” Processes of interaction generate both economic and political growth, and they produce and influence the built forms and social characteristics of all cities. Our model helps scholars distinguish the unique from the universal traits of cities today and in the past.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
古往今来的城市:一件还是多件?
从古代世界到现在,城市之间的可变性可以用两种方式有效地组织起来。首先,对主导城市活动和过程的关注导致了对两种基本城市类型的认识:经济城市和政治城市。今天的大多数城市都是经济城市,其增长是通过集聚过程进行的。相比之下,古代世界的大多数城市(以及今天的一些城市)都是政治城市,在这些城市中,权力和行政在构建城市和产生变革方面发挥着重要作用。其次,对城市建筑环境中社会互动过程的另一种关注导致人们认识到只有一种聚落包括所有城市-经济和政治;过去和现在。从这个意义上说,城市是“充满活力的拥挤”的场所。相互作用的过程产生了经济和政治的增长,它们产生并影响了所有城市的建筑形式和社会特征。我们的模型帮助学者区分当今和过去城市的独特特征和普遍特征。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Ancient City, Universal Growth? Exploring Urban Expansion and Economic Development on Rome's Eastern Periphery A New Kind of Relevance for Archaeology Modeling the Rise of the City: Early Urban Networks in Southern Italy Trajectories to Low-Density Settlements Past and Present: Paradox and Outcomes Corrigendum: Large-Scale Urban Prototyping for Responsive Cities: A Conceptual Framework
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1