HILCC: A Hierarchical Interface to Library of Congress Classification : a project report on the development of an operational prototype LCC-based subject interface.

S. P. Davis
{"title":"HILCC: A Hierarchical Interface to Library of Congress Classification : a project report on the development of an operational prototype LCC-based subject interface.","authors":"S. P. Davis","doi":"10.7916/D84J0R37","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Those who follow the progress of library-based information access and retrieval technologies will, if pressed, be obliged to admit that libraries and the automated system vendors that serve them have done little in the last decade to improve subject access to our print and, now, online collections. Much has of course been written and proposed in the library and information science literature about possible new strategies for access and retrieval, but few new approaches have actually been developed, tested and implemented in recent generations of library OPACs. Some would attribute this variously to: the marginal economics of library automation's niche marketplace; the timid approach vendors have taken to their feature enhancement processes; the enormous technical infrastructure changes libraries and vendors have had to absorb over the last ten years in order to stay even minimally current with new technologies; the aging systems of classification and subject analysis that continue to serve as our cataloging standards; the difficulty of innovating in OPACs when developers are constrained by the heavy hand of Z39.50 and fear the loss of interoperability with consortia and other cooperative systems; and the rise of the Web and the seemingly universal appeal of know-nothing, shot-in-the-dark keyword-Booleanism.","PeriodicalId":421982,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Internet Cataloging","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Internet Cataloging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7916/D84J0R37","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Those who follow the progress of library-based information access and retrieval technologies will, if pressed, be obliged to admit that libraries and the automated system vendors that serve them have done little in the last decade to improve subject access to our print and, now, online collections. Much has of course been written and proposed in the library and information science literature about possible new strategies for access and retrieval, but few new approaches have actually been developed, tested and implemented in recent generations of library OPACs. Some would attribute this variously to: the marginal economics of library automation's niche marketplace; the timid approach vendors have taken to their feature enhancement processes; the enormous technical infrastructure changes libraries and vendors have had to absorb over the last ten years in order to stay even minimally current with new technologies; the aging systems of classification and subject analysis that continue to serve as our cataloging standards; the difficulty of innovating in OPACs when developers are constrained by the heavy hand of Z39.50 and fear the loss of interoperability with consortia and other cooperative systems; and the rise of the Web and the seemingly universal appeal of know-nothing, shot-in-the-dark keyword-Booleanism.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
HILCC:国会图书馆分类的分层接口:一份关于开发基于lcc的可操作原型主题接口的项目报告。
那些关注以图书馆为基础的信息存取和检索技术进步的人,如果受到压力,将不得不承认,图书馆和为他们服务的自动化系统供应商在过去十年里几乎没有做什么来改善我们对印刷和现在的在线馆藏的访问。当然,在图书馆和信息科学文献中已经写了很多关于访问和检索可能的新策略的文章和建议,但是在最近几代图书馆opac中实际上已经开发,测试和实施的新方法很少。有些人将其归因于:图书馆自动化利基市场的边际经济学;厂商在特性增强过程中采取的畏畏缩缩的方法;在过去的十年里,库和供应商不得不吸收巨大的技术基础设施变化,以保持最新的新技术;老旧的分类和主题分析系统继续作为我们的编目标准;当开发人员受到Z39.50的严格限制并担心失去与联盟和其他合作系统的互操作性时,opac创新的困难;以及网络的兴起,以及似乎普遍存在的“一无所知”、“瞎猜”的关键词布尔主义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Growing Pains at REESWeb Reflections on Summarizing and Abstracting Gaining Independence with E-Print Archives and OAI Cataloging Internet Resources Scout Report Signpost
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1