The U.S. versus international ethics codes for accountants: A computerized content analysis

Hoseoup Lee, P. Leung, G. Seow, Kinsun Tam
{"title":"The U.S. versus international ethics codes for accountants: A computerized content analysis","authors":"Hoseoup Lee, P. Leung, G. Seow, Kinsun Tam","doi":"10.4192/1577-8517-v20_5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study applies computerized content analysis techniques, including term frequency analysis, readability index, and cosine similarity, to compare the U.S. versus international ethics codes for professional accountants. It reveals and compares new characteristics of these ethics codes. The U.S. ethics code is found to be less readable but more reflective of moral values concerning social order. The international ethics code emphasizes the independence and confidentiality principles, while the U.S. ethics code emphasizes independence and responsibilities. There are more similarities within the U.S. ethics code and within the international ethics code than between these ethics codes.","PeriodicalId":404481,"journal":{"name":"The International Journal of Digital Accounting Research","volume":"32 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The International Journal of Digital Accounting Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4192/1577-8517-v20_5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This study applies computerized content analysis techniques, including term frequency analysis, readability index, and cosine similarity, to compare the U.S. versus international ethics codes for professional accountants. It reveals and compares new characteristics of these ethics codes. The U.S. ethics code is found to be less readable but more reflective of moral values concerning social order. The international ethics code emphasizes the independence and confidentiality principles, while the U.S. ethics code emphasizes independence and responsibilities. There are more similarities within the U.S. ethics code and within the international ethics code than between these ethics codes.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
美国与国际会计道德规范:计算机化内容分析
本研究应用计算机化内容分析技术,包括术语频率分析、可读性指数和余弦相似度,来比较美国与国际专业会计师道德规范。揭示和比较了这些道德规范的新特点。美国的道德准则可读性较差,但更多地反映了与社会秩序有关的道德价值观。国际伦理准则强调独立性和保密原则,而美国伦理准则强调独立性和责任原则。美国道德准则和国际道德准则之间的相似之处比这些道德准则之间的相似之处更多。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The blockchain in the renewable energy sector: a tool for sustainability promotion Anomaly detection with the density based spatial clustering of applications with noise (DBSCAN) to detect potentially fraudulent wire transfers The authorship origins of accounting information systems and emerging technologies research: An analysis of accounting information systems journals Professional skepticism for green reputation clients: A mixed method study of technology enabled audits Infusing Blockchain in accounting curricula and practice: expectations, challenges, and strategies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1