P02 Efficacy of intravenous metoprolol for heart rate control in patients undergoing CT coronary angiography

M. Hoe, S. Qayyum, D. Auger, N. Damani, A. Griguer, P. Jain, N. Keenan, Masood Khan, Anish Prabhakar, Kevin Rosenfeld, J. Sehmi
{"title":"P02 Efficacy of intravenous metoprolol for heart rate control in patients undergoing CT coronary angiography","authors":"M. Hoe, S. Qayyum, D. Auger, N. Damani, A. Griguer, P. Jain, N. Keenan, Masood Khan, Anish Prabhakar, Kevin Rosenfeld, J. Sehmi","doi":"10.1136/HEARTJNL-2020-BSCI.15","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction Computer tomography coronary angiography (CTCA) can be performed with improved image quality and at lower radiation dose when heart rate is lowered to less than 60 beats per minute (bpm). In our centre intravenous Metoprolol is administered on the CT table targeting a heart rate below 60 bpm. The aim of this audit was to assess the efficacy of intravenous beta-blockade to achieve optimal heart rates in patients undergoing CTCA. Methods We carried out a retrospective case note review of all patients undergoing CTCA between 1 – 30 November 2018. Scanning was performed using a 320-detector row scanner with prospective gating (Toshiba Aquilon One). Data collected included attending radiologist/cardiologist, dose of Metoprolol, heart rate at time of image acquisition and baseline patient characteristics. Results Case notes of 131 consecutive patients referred for CTCA were reviewed. The mean heart rate achieved was 61.7 bpm (range 30–130 bpm). The average administered dose of metoprolol was 15.5 mg (range 0–60 mg). 51% of patients achieved a heart rate less than 60 bpm at the time of scanning. For patients achieving target heart rates below 60 bpm the average dose of metoprolol was 9.3 mg, and 22.4 mg for those with heart rates greater than 60 bpm at the time of image acquisition. Conclusion Routine administration of intravenous beta-blocker peri-procedure fails to achieve optimal heart rate control in approximately half of all patients undergoing CTCA. Alternative protocols including pre-treatment with a short course of oral beta-blockers should be considered.","PeriodicalId":383700,"journal":{"name":"Scientific poster abstracts","volume":"368 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientific poster abstracts","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/HEARTJNL-2020-BSCI.15","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction Computer tomography coronary angiography (CTCA) can be performed with improved image quality and at lower radiation dose when heart rate is lowered to less than 60 beats per minute (bpm). In our centre intravenous Metoprolol is administered on the CT table targeting a heart rate below 60 bpm. The aim of this audit was to assess the efficacy of intravenous beta-blockade to achieve optimal heart rates in patients undergoing CTCA. Methods We carried out a retrospective case note review of all patients undergoing CTCA between 1 – 30 November 2018. Scanning was performed using a 320-detector row scanner with prospective gating (Toshiba Aquilon One). Data collected included attending radiologist/cardiologist, dose of Metoprolol, heart rate at time of image acquisition and baseline patient characteristics. Results Case notes of 131 consecutive patients referred for CTCA were reviewed. The mean heart rate achieved was 61.7 bpm (range 30–130 bpm). The average administered dose of metoprolol was 15.5 mg (range 0–60 mg). 51% of patients achieved a heart rate less than 60 bpm at the time of scanning. For patients achieving target heart rates below 60 bpm the average dose of metoprolol was 9.3 mg, and 22.4 mg for those with heart rates greater than 60 bpm at the time of image acquisition. Conclusion Routine administration of intravenous beta-blocker peri-procedure fails to achieve optimal heart rate control in approximately half of all patients undergoing CTCA. Alternative protocols including pre-treatment with a short course of oral beta-blockers should be considered.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
P02 CT冠状动脉造影患者静脉注射美托洛尔控制心率的疗效
计算机断层冠状动脉造影(CTCA)可以提高图像质量,在较低的辐射剂量下进行,当心率降低到每分钟60次以下(bpm)。在我们的中心,美托洛尔静脉注射是在CT台上进行的,目标是心率低于每分钟60次。本审计的目的是评估静脉β -阻断剂对CTCA患者达到最佳心率的疗效。方法:我们对2018年11月1日至30日期间接受CTCA的所有患者进行了回顾性病例回顾。使用320检测器行扫描仪进行扫描,带前瞻性门控(东芝Aquilon One)。收集的数据包括参加放射科医生/心脏病专家,美托洛尔的剂量,图像采集时的心率和基线患者特征。结果回顾了131例连续转诊的CTCA患者的病例记录。平均心率达到61.7 bpm(范围30-130 bpm)。美托洛尔的平均给药剂量为15.5 mg(范围0-60 mg)。51%的患者在扫描时的心率低于60 BPM。对于目标心率低于60 bpm的患者,美托洛尔的平均剂量为9.3 mg,对于图像采集时心率大于60 bpm的患者,美托洛尔的平均剂量为22.4 mg。结论:在接受CTCA的患者中,约有一半的患者在围手术期常规静脉注射β受体阻滞剂未能达到最佳心率控制。应考虑其他方案,包括短期口服-受体阻滞剂的预处理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
P08 Automated calculation of the RV:LV ratio in acute pulmonary embolism: a real-world feasibility and clinical impact study P11 Coronary artery disease prevalence by computed tomography coronary angiography in patients with familial hypercholesterolaemia P12 Exploring the value of computed tomography coronary angiography in guiding management of asymptomatic patients with familial hypercholesterolaemia P15 Assessment of blood flow patterns in patients with type B aortic dissection by 4-dimensional flow phase contrast magnetic resonance imaging – a pilot study P16 Rubidium myocardial perfusion PET-CT: initial experience in first 100 patients
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1