The Need for a Role Ontology

Mark von Rosing, J. Zachman
{"title":"The Need for a Role Ontology","authors":"Mark von Rosing, J. Zachman","doi":"10.4018/IJCSSA.2017010101","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The importance of employees as knowledge workers acting in the correct roles is not a new phenomenon, but as work itself becomes less tangible, concerns with understanding, describing, and managing roles becomes an increasingly complex, challenging, and important subject. In the knowledge economy, where the employees are in the centre of the industrial revolution and digitalization, there is now a greater need to enable meaningful and well-described roles that set out welldefined tasks that each actor will perform within the enterprise. Also within the extended enterprise, which is the collaboration with its partners, service suppliers, the wholesalers, retailers etc. and the attendant complexity, the need for well-described roles is rapidly increasing. Therefore, it is of critical importance for our frameworks, methods, approaches and practices to answer the need for roles. Consequently, this paper focuses on the missing concepts exemplifying the need for a role ontology with a role taxonomy, clear defined objects, descriptions, class types, stereotypes and subtypes as well as semantic role relationships. It does so by firstly defining the requirements in terms of the scope, objective as well as which challenges, issues and problems should the role ontology as an application ontology address. Secondly, we describe the integration and relationship between the role ontology with domain, core and foundational ontologies. Followed by the description of the design components of the role ontology, this includes its objects, class types, descriptors, shapes i.e. notations, attributes, and relations. We than conclude by discussing lessons learned by applying and thereby testing the ontology in practice.","PeriodicalId":277615,"journal":{"name":"Int. J. Concept. Struct. Smart Appl.","volume":"90 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Int. J. Concept. Struct. Smart Appl.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4018/IJCSSA.2017010101","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The importance of employees as knowledge workers acting in the correct roles is not a new phenomenon, but as work itself becomes less tangible, concerns with understanding, describing, and managing roles becomes an increasingly complex, challenging, and important subject. In the knowledge economy, where the employees are in the centre of the industrial revolution and digitalization, there is now a greater need to enable meaningful and well-described roles that set out welldefined tasks that each actor will perform within the enterprise. Also within the extended enterprise, which is the collaboration with its partners, service suppliers, the wholesalers, retailers etc. and the attendant complexity, the need for well-described roles is rapidly increasing. Therefore, it is of critical importance for our frameworks, methods, approaches and practices to answer the need for roles. Consequently, this paper focuses on the missing concepts exemplifying the need for a role ontology with a role taxonomy, clear defined objects, descriptions, class types, stereotypes and subtypes as well as semantic role relationships. It does so by firstly defining the requirements in terms of the scope, objective as well as which challenges, issues and problems should the role ontology as an application ontology address. Secondly, we describe the integration and relationship between the role ontology with domain, core and foundational ontologies. Followed by the description of the design components of the role ontology, this includes its objects, class types, descriptors, shapes i.e. notations, attributes, and relations. We than conclude by discussing lessons learned by applying and thereby testing the ontology in practice.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对角色本体的需求
员工作为知识工作者扮演正确角色的重要性并不是一个新现象,但随着工作本身变得越来越不具体,对角色的理解、描述和管理成为一个越来越复杂、具有挑战性和重要的主题。在知识经济中,员工处于工业革命和数字化的中心,现在更需要实现有意义且描述良好的角色,这些角色为每个参与者在企业内执行的任务设定了明确的定义。在扩展的企业中,也就是与合作伙伴、服务供应商、批发商、零售商等的协作以及随之而来的复杂性,对描述良好的角色的需求正在迅速增加。因此,我们的框架、方法、途径和实践对满足角色需求至关重要。因此,本文将重点放在缺失的概念上,举例说明需要一个具有角色分类、明确定义的对象、描述、类类型、原型和子类型以及语义角色关系的角色本体。它首先从范围、目标以及角色本体作为应用本体应该解决的挑战、问题和问题等方面定义需求。其次,描述了角色本体与领域本体、核心本体和基础本体的集成和关系。接着是角色本体的设计组件的描述,包括它的对象、类类型、描述符、形状(即符号、属性和关系)。最后,我们讨论了通过在实践中应用和测试本体论所获得的经验教训。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Using Business Ontology to Integrate Business Architecture and Business Process Management for Healthcare Modeling Embedded System Verification Using Formal Model an Approach Based on the Combined Use of UML and Maude Language On Because and Why: Reasoning with Natural Language Specifying Constraints for Detecting Inconsistencies in A Conceptual Graph Knowledge Base Conceptual Graphs Based Approach for Subjective Answers Evaluation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1