{"title":"Foreign and National Experience of Implementation of Infrastructural Projects and Territorial Development Programs","authors":"O. Patrakeeva","doi":"10.15688/re.volsu.2021.4.4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Infrastructural investment differs significantly from the forecasted indicators because of global demand. The politicization and overregulation of global infrastructure market negatively affects its growth. The effectiveness of state programs depends on quality of the institutional environment. The paper analyses approaches to the implementation of national programs in China, USA, Great Britain, and Germany. China’s high economic growth rate is due not only to low cost of labor, but also to the fact of joining the World Trade Organization and large-scale infrastructure investments. Successful experience of infrastructural programs’ implementation in the UK is mostly due to the fact that the selection of projects is based on their social and economic significance and is made in accordance with the goals of public policy. Public and private partnership (PPP) is a popular mechanism for infrastructure projects’ financing. However, there are cases of inefficient public and private partnership (PPP) projects. Risks of a private partner may not correspond to the level of required profitability even under conditions of strategic decision making when project is supported by the state. Infrastructural bonds are an effective tool for public and private partnership (PPP) in conditions of a shortage of credit resources for the construction of expensive infrastructural facilities. Risks associated with project implementation can be reduced thank to management quality. Public control encourages the state to evaluate large infrastructural projects in terms of economic benefits and potential environmental, and social consequences. The issues of infrastructural development are relevant for Russian regions. The gap between demand and actual investment is 1.63% of GDP. National infrastructure projects should be implemented in accordance with goals and objectives of strategies of social and economic development.","PeriodicalId":337660,"journal":{"name":"Regionalnaya ekonomika. Yug Rossii","volume":"43 5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Regionalnaya ekonomika. Yug Rossii","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15688/re.volsu.2021.4.4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Infrastructural investment differs significantly from the forecasted indicators because of global demand. The politicization and overregulation of global infrastructure market negatively affects its growth. The effectiveness of state programs depends on quality of the institutional environment. The paper analyses approaches to the implementation of national programs in China, USA, Great Britain, and Germany. China’s high economic growth rate is due not only to low cost of labor, but also to the fact of joining the World Trade Organization and large-scale infrastructure investments. Successful experience of infrastructural programs’ implementation in the UK is mostly due to the fact that the selection of projects is based on their social and economic significance and is made in accordance with the goals of public policy. Public and private partnership (PPP) is a popular mechanism for infrastructure projects’ financing. However, there are cases of inefficient public and private partnership (PPP) projects. Risks of a private partner may not correspond to the level of required profitability even under conditions of strategic decision making when project is supported by the state. Infrastructural bonds are an effective tool for public and private partnership (PPP) in conditions of a shortage of credit resources for the construction of expensive infrastructural facilities. Risks associated with project implementation can be reduced thank to management quality. Public control encourages the state to evaluate large infrastructural projects in terms of economic benefits and potential environmental, and social consequences. The issues of infrastructural development are relevant for Russian regions. The gap between demand and actual investment is 1.63% of GDP. National infrastructure projects should be implemented in accordance with goals and objectives of strategies of social and economic development.
由于全球需求,基础设施投资与预测指标存在显著差异。全球基础设施市场的政治化和过度监管对其增长产生了负面影响。国家项目的有效性取决于制度环境的质量。本文分析了中国、美国、英国和德国实施国家项目的途径。中国经济的高速增长不仅得益于低廉的劳动力成本,还得益于加入世界贸易组织和大规模的基础设施投资。英国基础设施项目实施的成功经验主要是基于项目的社会和经济意义,并根据公共政策的目标进行选择。PPP (Public and private partnership)是一种流行的基础设施项目融资机制。然而,也有一些低效的公私合作项目。即使在国家支持项目的战略决策条件下,私营合作伙伴的风险也可能不符合所要求的盈利水平。基础设施债券是政府和社会资本合作(PPP)在缺乏信贷资源的情况下进行昂贵基础设施建设的有效工具。由于管理质量的提高,与项目实施相关的风险可以降低。公共控制鼓励国家根据经济效益和潜在的环境和社会后果来评估大型基础设施项目。基础设施发展问题与俄罗斯各地区有关。需求和实际投资之间的差距是GDP的1.63%。国家基础设施项目的实施应符合社会和经济发展战略的目标和目的。