The Third-Party Funding Debate:A Misguided Focus on Definitions at the Expense of Policy Considerations

R. Teitelbaum
{"title":"The Third-Party Funding Debate:A Misguided Focus on Definitions at the Expense of Policy Considerations","authors":"R. Teitelbaum","doi":"10.54648/bcdr2018004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Third-party funding in international arbitration remains a vague and elusive concept. This article posits that the international arbitration community’s struggle to define third-party funding is a consequence of its failure to address broader policy concerns over fairness in international arbitration. The policy concerns over fairness in international arbitration should be seen as a priority and tackled with practical solutions that ensure equality of arms and access to capital. It is only after such policy concerns have been addressed that a rational definition of third-party funding can be achieved.","PeriodicalId":166341,"journal":{"name":"BCDR International Arbitration Review","volume":"104 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BCDR International Arbitration Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54648/bcdr2018004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Third-party funding in international arbitration remains a vague and elusive concept. This article posits that the international arbitration community’s struggle to define third-party funding is a consequence of its failure to address broader policy concerns over fairness in international arbitration. The policy concerns over fairness in international arbitration should be seen as a priority and tackled with practical solutions that ensure equality of arms and access to capital. It is only after such policy concerns have been addressed that a rational definition of third-party funding can be achieved.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
第三方资助之争:以政策考虑为代价而错误地关注定义
国际仲裁中的第三方资助仍然是一个模糊和难以捉摸的概念。本文认为,国际仲裁界在定义第三方资金方面的努力是其未能解决有关国际仲裁公平性的更广泛政策问题的结果。对国际仲裁公平性的政策关切应被视为优先事项,并以确保武器平等和获得资本的实际解决办法加以解决。只有在解决了这些政策问题之后,才能实现对第三方融资的合理定义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Changed Circumstances and Oil and Gas Contracts Aramco: The Story of the World’s Most Valuable Oil Concession and Its Landmark Arbitration Petroleum Concessions in Egypt: A Recipe for Disputes? Stabilization Clauses: Do They Have a Future? COVID-19 and the Exceptions to Contractual Liability in Arab Contract Law
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1