Pregnancy rates following endometrial polyp removal: A comparison of resectoscopes and the Lin polyp snare system

S. Takeda, S. Tanimura, Hiroshi Hunamoto, S. Nomura, Yuri Kusabiraki, Takashi Hosono, Takayoshi Sumitani, Yasushi Sitano, M. Nakajima, R. Minami, Y. Ametani, T. Nakano
{"title":"Pregnancy rates following endometrial polyp removal: A comparison of resectoscopes and the Lin polyp snare system","authors":"S. Takeda, S. Tanimura, Hiroshi Hunamoto, S. Nomura, Yuri Kusabiraki, Takashi Hosono, Takayoshi Sumitani, Yasushi Sitano, M. Nakajima, R. Minami, Y. Ametani, T. Nakano","doi":"10.5180/JSGOE.32.179","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Endometrial polyps can cause infertility and their removal is recommended. Transcervical resection (TCR), which is commonly selected, is performed using a resectoscope under anesthesia. Recently, use of the Lin snare system (Snare) has been reported for polyp removal without anesthesia. Snare uses a diagnostic flexible hysteroscope with an outer diameter of 3.1 mm. However, the effects on infertility are unclear. We investigated infertile patients with endometrial polyps at our hospital and compared pregnancy rates based on the two different methods. Materials and Methods: Between January 2008 and April 2014, we analyzed 64 patients who were postoperatively followed-up for at least 12 months. The patient backgrounds and pregnancy rates were investigated retrospectively for both groups. TCR was performed under general anesthesia, with hospitalization. Snare was used with no anesthesia and no cervical dilatation on an outpatient basis. Since the introduction of Snare at our hospital in 2012, it has been the first","PeriodicalId":325241,"journal":{"name":"Japanese Journal of Gynecologic and Obstetric Endoscopy","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Japanese Journal of Gynecologic and Obstetric Endoscopy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5180/JSGOE.32.179","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Endometrial polyps can cause infertility and their removal is recommended. Transcervical resection (TCR), which is commonly selected, is performed using a resectoscope under anesthesia. Recently, use of the Lin snare system (Snare) has been reported for polyp removal without anesthesia. Snare uses a diagnostic flexible hysteroscope with an outer diameter of 3.1 mm. However, the effects on infertility are unclear. We investigated infertile patients with endometrial polyps at our hospital and compared pregnancy rates based on the two different methods. Materials and Methods: Between January 2008 and April 2014, we analyzed 64 patients who were postoperatively followed-up for at least 12 months. The patient backgrounds and pregnancy rates were investigated retrospectively for both groups. TCR was performed under general anesthesia, with hospitalization. Snare was used with no anesthesia and no cervical dilatation on an outpatient basis. Since the introduction of Snare at our hospital in 2012, it has been the first
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
子宫内膜息肉切除后的妊娠率:切除术与林息肉圈套系统的比较
简介:子宫内膜息肉可导致不孕症,建议切除。经宫颈切除术(TCR),这是通常选择的,是在麻醉下使用切除镜进行的。最近,使用林圈套系统(圈套)已被报道为息肉切除不麻醉。Snare使用外径3.1 mm的柔性宫腔镜诊断。然而,对不孕症的影响尚不清楚。我们调查了在我院就诊的子宫内膜息肉不孕症患者,比较了两种不同方法的妊娠率。材料与方法:2008年1月至2014年4月,我们对64例术后随访至少12个月的患者进行了分析。回顾性调查两组患者的背景和妊娠率。TCR在全麻下进行,住院治疗。在没有麻醉和宫颈扩张的门诊基础上使用圈套。自2012年我们医院引进Snare以来,它一直是第一个
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A case of laparoscopic adhesiolysis and cutting of a cord like structure of the vaginal stump for persistent pain after hysterectomy Effect of voice training for reducing misrecognition with use of AESOP3000 Laparoscopic versus abdominal myomectomy, size and number of the myomas from limiting factors for laparoscopic myomectomy Unsuccessful hysteroscopic removal of a large calcified submucous myoma Clinicopathological analysis of Laparoscopically Removed Appendices of Nineteen Patients with Endometriosis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1