PROBABILISTIC ASSESSMENT OF THE RELIABILITY OF PASSIVE

O. Voskobiinyk, Andriy Mozgovuy
{"title":"PROBABILISTIC ASSESSMENT OF THE RELIABILITY OF PASSIVE","authors":"O. Voskobiinyk, Andriy Mozgovuy","doi":"10.18664/1994-7852.189.2020.213642","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":". The introduction of probabilistic methods for assessing the reliability of building structures is governed by modern design standards. When constructing engineering facilities, the task is to construct the structural elements using passive anchors. This work is aimed at creating and testing an algorithm of probabilistic assessment of passive anchors, which determines its relevance. The work’s objective is to develop an algorithm of probabilistic assessment of the reliability of passive anchors by the criteria of loss of reliability, which are possible during the operation of the anchor– concrete system, taking into account the random nature of the material properties and load. The input deterministic parameters of the algorithm were: basic anchorage length; a cross-sectional area of the anchor; Poisson’s ratio of concrete; concrete modulus of elasticity. Random inputs were: axial tensile strength and compression strength; tensile resistance of rebar; axial and shear forces. The calculation is performed by the method of statistical tests N times. The number of tests, in which the rod is considered unreliable, refers to the total number of tests and determines the risk for the steel anchor of reaching its boundary conditions for its entire service life, followed by calculation of the annual risk for the anchor of reaching its boundary conditions. According to the results of probabilistic calculations, the risk for the anchor of reaching its boundary conditions for the assigned service life is Р = 1.87 10 -2 year -1 , the annual risk for the anchor of reaching its boundary conditions is Р r = 3.77 10 -4 year -1 , which does not exceed its permissible value of Р і ех = 5 10 -4 year -1 , provided for by the design standards for structures of CC2 consequences (responsibility) class for the estimated lifetime of T ef = 50 years.","PeriodicalId":183715,"journal":{"name":"Collection of scientific works of the Ukrainian State University of Railway Transport","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Collection of scientific works of the Ukrainian State University of Railway Transport","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18664/1994-7852.189.2020.213642","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

. The introduction of probabilistic methods for assessing the reliability of building structures is governed by modern design standards. When constructing engineering facilities, the task is to construct the structural elements using passive anchors. This work is aimed at creating and testing an algorithm of probabilistic assessment of passive anchors, which determines its relevance. The work’s objective is to develop an algorithm of probabilistic assessment of the reliability of passive anchors by the criteria of loss of reliability, which are possible during the operation of the anchor– concrete system, taking into account the random nature of the material properties and load. The input deterministic parameters of the algorithm were: basic anchorage length; a cross-sectional area of the anchor; Poisson’s ratio of concrete; concrete modulus of elasticity. Random inputs were: axial tensile strength and compression strength; tensile resistance of rebar; axial and shear forces. The calculation is performed by the method of statistical tests N times. The number of tests, in which the rod is considered unreliable, refers to the total number of tests and determines the risk for the steel anchor of reaching its boundary conditions for its entire service life, followed by calculation of the annual risk for the anchor of reaching its boundary conditions. According to the results of probabilistic calculations, the risk for the anchor of reaching its boundary conditions for the assigned service life is Р = 1.87 10 -2 year -1 , the annual risk for the anchor of reaching its boundary conditions is Р r = 3.77 10 -4 year -1 , which does not exceed its permissible value of Р і ех = 5 10 -4 year -1 , provided for by the design standards for structures of CC2 consequences (responsibility) class for the estimated lifetime of T ef = 50 years.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
被动可靠性的概率评估
。采用概率方法评估建筑结构的可靠性是受现代设计标准的约束。在施工工程设施时,任务是使用被动锚杆来施工结构单元。这项工作旨在创建和测试被动锚的概率评估算法,这决定了它的相关性。该工作的目标是开发一种基于可靠性损失标准的被动锚杆可靠性概率评估算法,这在锚杆-混凝土系统运行期间是可能的,同时考虑到材料特性和载荷的随机性。算法的输入确定性参数为:基本锚固长度;锚的横截面积;混凝土泊松比;混凝土弹性模量。随机输入为:轴向抗拉强度和抗压强度;钢筋抗拉性能;轴向和剪切力。采用N次统计检验的方法进行计算。锚杆被认为不可靠的试验次数是指试验的总次数,确定了钢锚在其整个使用寿命内达到其边界条件的风险,然后计算锚杆达到其边界条件的年风险。根据概率计算的结果,锚的风险分配达到其边界条件的使用寿命是Р= 1.87 10 2年1,年度的风险达到其边界条件的锚Рr = 3.77 10 4年1,它不超过容许值的Ріех10 4年1 = 5,供结构设计标准的CC2的后果(责任)类的估计寿命T ef = 50年。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
DETERMINATION THE PARAMETERS OF STRESSED AND DEFORMED STATE A GONDOLA CAR AT DURING INTERACTION BY A ROTARY CAR DUMPER EVALUATION OF THE EFFICIENCY OF THE OPTIONS FOR THE MODERNIZATION OF THE HEAT SUPPLY AND THERMAL PROTECTION OF THE OFFICE BUILDING THE IMPACT OF ITS OWN STRESSES ON CONCRETE STRENGTH BY COMPRESSION UNDER THE INFLUENCE OF TIME DEVELOPMENT OF IDEAS ABOUT ELECTRICAL CORROSION OF RAILWAY TRACK STRUCTURES AND IMPROVEMENT OF THEIR PROTECTION METHODS USING ELECTRICALLY CONDUCTIVE COMPOSITIONS MODELING THE INTERRELATION BETWEEN ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND SHIP SAFETY BASED ON MULTIPLE LINEAR REGRESSION
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1