A WS-Agreement-Based QoS Auditor Negotiation Mechanism for Grids

Alisson Andrade, A. Melo
{"title":"A WS-Agreement-Based QoS Auditor Negotiation Mechanism for Grids","authors":"Alisson Andrade, A. Melo","doi":"10.1109/Grid.2011.10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"High performance platforms composed of commodity computing resources, such as grids and peer-to-peer systems, have greatly evolved and assumed an important role in the last decade. Nevertheless, their wide commercial use still depends on the establishment of an effective quality of service (QoS) infrastructure in those environments. For this reason, a variety of proposals have recently emerged in which consumer and provider monitor and control grid resources in order to guarantee previously established service level agreements. However, in many cases there is lack of trust between provider and consumer in relation to monitoring those agreements. In such cases, it becomes necessary to introduce a third entity - an impartial and trustworthy QoS auditor - in order to solve conflicts of interest. Though, as there may be several auditors trusted by provider and consumer, we claim that the QoS auditor needs to be negotiated and established just as the service level agreement is negotiated by the parties. In order to support this issue, the present paper proposes and evaluates a negotiation mechanism for QoS auditors in computational grids. Some of the proposed mechanism's characteristics are low intrusiveness and use of open standards, such as the WS-Agreement. Experimental analysis on a prototype of the proposed negotiation mechanism have shown that the auditor negotiation process took less than a minute to finish, which is far less than the service execution time in most grid computing use cases.","PeriodicalId":308086,"journal":{"name":"2011 IEEE/ACM 12th International Conference on Grid Computing","volume":"146 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2011 IEEE/ACM 12th International Conference on Grid Computing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/Grid.2011.10","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

Abstract

High performance platforms composed of commodity computing resources, such as grids and peer-to-peer systems, have greatly evolved and assumed an important role in the last decade. Nevertheless, their wide commercial use still depends on the establishment of an effective quality of service (QoS) infrastructure in those environments. For this reason, a variety of proposals have recently emerged in which consumer and provider monitor and control grid resources in order to guarantee previously established service level agreements. However, in many cases there is lack of trust between provider and consumer in relation to monitoring those agreements. In such cases, it becomes necessary to introduce a third entity - an impartial and trustworthy QoS auditor - in order to solve conflicts of interest. Though, as there may be several auditors trusted by provider and consumer, we claim that the QoS auditor needs to be negotiated and established just as the service level agreement is negotiated by the parties. In order to support this issue, the present paper proposes and evaluates a negotiation mechanism for QoS auditors in computational grids. Some of the proposed mechanism's characteristics are low intrusiveness and use of open standards, such as the WS-Agreement. Experimental analysis on a prototype of the proposed negotiation mechanism have shown that the auditor negotiation process took less than a minute to finish, which is far less than the service execution time in most grid computing use cases.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于ws - agreement的网格QoS审计器协商机制
由商品计算资源组成的高性能平台,如网格和点对点系统,在过去十年中得到了很大的发展,并发挥了重要的作用。然而,它们的广泛商业应用仍然取决于在这些环境中建立有效的服务质量(QoS)基础设施。由于这个原因,最近出现了各种各样的建议,其中消费者和提供者监视和控制网格资源,以保证先前建立的服务水平协议。但是,在许多情况下,提供者和消费者之间在监督这些协议方面缺乏信任。在这种情况下,有必要引入第三方实体-一个公正和值得信赖的QoS审计员-以解决利益冲突。尽管如此,由于提供者和消费者可能信任多个审计员,我们认为QoS审计员需要协商和建立,就像双方协商服务水平协议一样。为了支持这一问题,本文提出并评估了计算网格中QoS审计器的协商机制。所提议的机制的一些特征是低侵入性和使用开放标准,例如WS-Agreement。对提出的协商机制原型的实验分析表明,审计器协商过程在一分钟内完成,这远远少于大多数网格计算用例中的服务执行时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Replicated Grid Resources HisT/PLIER: A Two-Fold Provenance Approach for Grid-Enabled Scientific Workflows Using WS-VLAM Using the Gfarm File System as a POSIX Compatible Storage Platform for Hadoop MapReduce Applications MARIANE: MApReduce Implementation Adapted for HPC Environments Improved Grid Security Posture through Multi-factor Authentication
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1