Sentiment Analysis of Presidential Candidates Anies Baswedan and Ganjar Pranowo Using Naïve Bayes Method

Nurirwan Saputra, Karandi Nurbagja, Turiyan Turiyan
{"title":"Sentiment Analysis of Presidential Candidates Anies Baswedan and Ganjar Pranowo Using Naïve Bayes Method","authors":"Nurirwan Saputra, Karandi Nurbagja, Turiyan Turiyan","doi":"10.38101/sisfotek.v12i2.552","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Presidential elections in Indonesia are carried out in a democratic manner in which the people choose the figures who will nominate themselves for president. With the presidential nomination, there will be many surveys of several figures who have electability to become presidential candidates. Based on a survey that has been issued by several figures who are running for president, namely Anies Baswedan and Ganjar Pranowo, who are the benchmarks for the community to be able to express their opinions from existing social media, one of which is Facebook. This study takes data through a scraping process which is then cleaned or cleaned, then five labels are given, namely: 1 (very negative), 2 (negative), 3 (neutral), 4 (positive), and 5 (very positive). aims to see which sentiment is the highest given by warganet to the upcoming presidential election. This study concludes that netizens have negative sentiments towards figures in the upcoming presidential election. seen from the data randomly generated 49% negative comments, 35% positive comments and 16% neutral. In addition, from 510 data taken by classification using the Naïve Bayes method, as well as testing using the 10-fold cross validation method with Quadgram tokenization resulted in an accuracy of 42.75%, precision 42.10%, and recall 42.70%.","PeriodicalId":378682,"journal":{"name":"JURNAL SISFOTEK GLOBAL","volume":"191 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JURNAL SISFOTEK GLOBAL","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.38101/sisfotek.v12i2.552","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Presidential elections in Indonesia are carried out in a democratic manner in which the people choose the figures who will nominate themselves for president. With the presidential nomination, there will be many surveys of several figures who have electability to become presidential candidates. Based on a survey that has been issued by several figures who are running for president, namely Anies Baswedan and Ganjar Pranowo, who are the benchmarks for the community to be able to express their opinions from existing social media, one of which is Facebook. This study takes data through a scraping process which is then cleaned or cleaned, then five labels are given, namely: 1 (very negative), 2 (negative), 3 (neutral), 4 (positive), and 5 (very positive). aims to see which sentiment is the highest given by warganet to the upcoming presidential election. This study concludes that netizens have negative sentiments towards figures in the upcoming presidential election. seen from the data randomly generated 49% negative comments, 35% positive comments and 16% neutral. In addition, from 510 data taken by classification using the Naïve Bayes method, as well as testing using the 10-fold cross validation method with Quadgram tokenization resulted in an accuracy of 42.75%, precision 42.10%, and recall 42.70%.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于Naïve贝叶斯方法的总统候选人Anies Baswedan和Ganjar Pranowo的情感分析
印度尼西亚的总统选举以民主的方式进行,由人民选出提名自己为总统候选人的人物。随着总统候选人的提名,将会对几位有可能成为总统候选人的人进行多次调查。根据几位竞选总统的人物发布的一项调查,即Anies Baswedan和Ganjar Pranowo,他们是社区能够通过现有社交媒体表达意见的基准,其中一个是Facebook。本研究将数据通过一个抓取过程,然后对数据进行清理或清理,然后给出五个标签,分别是:1(非常负面)、2(负面)、3(中性)、4(正面)和5(非常正面)。在即将到来的总统选举中,军警们给出的最高评价是什么?本研究的结论是,网民对即将到来的总统选举的人物有负面情绪。从数据中可以看出,随机产生的负面评论占49%,正面评论占35%,中性评论占16%。此外,使用Naïve贝叶斯方法对510个数据进行分类,并使用带有Quadgram标记化的10倍交叉验证方法进行测试,准确率为42.75%,精密度为42.10%,召回率为42.70%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Rational Unified Process as a Software Development Method in Decision Support Systems Design with Simple Additive Weighting in Determining Priority Rehabilitations of Classrooms Expert System for Corn Disease Identification Using Case Based Reasoning Method Implementation of a Business Intelligence Model for Analysis Banking and Credit Management Application of the AHP-TOPSIS Method As Best Employee Decision Support System Utilizing Machine Learning For Identifying Potential Beneficiaries of Family Hope Program
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1