Lecturing

James G. Clawson
{"title":"Lecturing","authors":"James G. Clawson","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.911823","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This note summarizes the pros and cons of lecturing and outlines several principles of giving, and listening to, good lectures. It includes a reference list for additional reading. Excerpt UVA-PHA-0048 LECTURING For most college teachers lecturing is like throwing the shot. In fact, it is more like throwing a frisbee. —Ed Davis Lecturing is probably the most common form of instruction in education in the world. For many of us, the notions of college teaching and lecturing are so closely aligned that we automatically think of the latter when we think of the former. That lecturing is so common does not, however, make it necessarily the best or the most powerful method of instruction. Like all other forms of instruction, lecturing has strengths and weaknesses, some of which will be explored and examined here. This note will also outline some suggestions for preparing effective lectures. General Principles Lecturing well requires work and practice. Lectures are not something you can do well merely because you have an advanced degree. You cannot simply walk into an auditorium without careful thought, planning, and practice and give an excellent lecture. Lecturing is an art as much as a science. Like other methods of instruction, it deserves special attention and practice if you want to become more skilled. Effective lecturing is neither the mere reading of notes nor the casual regurgitation of facts that you may have learned throughout your life. One senior professor at a well-known university gave a lecture on lecturing and noted that in 42 years he had never been in a meeting at the school that focused on the quality of teaching. This is a shameful thing for any educational institution. We cannot be good teachers if we don't work at it. . . .","PeriodicalId":413948,"journal":{"name":"Political Science Educator: Courses","volume":"110 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Political Science Educator: Courses","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.911823","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This note summarizes the pros and cons of lecturing and outlines several principles of giving, and listening to, good lectures. It includes a reference list for additional reading. Excerpt UVA-PHA-0048 LECTURING For most college teachers lecturing is like throwing the shot. In fact, it is more like throwing a frisbee. —Ed Davis Lecturing is probably the most common form of instruction in education in the world. For many of us, the notions of college teaching and lecturing are so closely aligned that we automatically think of the latter when we think of the former. That lecturing is so common does not, however, make it necessarily the best or the most powerful method of instruction. Like all other forms of instruction, lecturing has strengths and weaknesses, some of which will be explored and examined here. This note will also outline some suggestions for preparing effective lectures. General Principles Lecturing well requires work and practice. Lectures are not something you can do well merely because you have an advanced degree. You cannot simply walk into an auditorium without careful thought, planning, and practice and give an excellent lecture. Lecturing is an art as much as a science. Like other methods of instruction, it deserves special attention and practice if you want to become more skilled. Effective lecturing is neither the mere reading of notes nor the casual regurgitation of facts that you may have learned throughout your life. One senior professor at a well-known university gave a lecture on lecturing and noted that in 42 years he had never been in a meeting at the school that focused on the quality of teaching. This is a shameful thing for any educational institution. We cannot be good teachers if we don't work at it. . . .
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
讲课
这篇笔记总结了演讲的优点和缺点,并概述了几条讲好课和听好课的原则。它包括一个额外阅读的参考书目。对大多数大学教师来说,讲课就像扔球一样。事实上,这更像是扔飞盘。讲座可能是世界上最常见的教育形式。对于我们中的许多人来说,大学教学和讲课的概念是如此紧密地联系在一起,以至于当我们想到前者时,我们会自动想到后者。然而,讲课如此普遍并不意味着它一定是最好或最有力的教学方法。像所有其他形式的教学一样,讲课也有优点和缺点,其中一些将在这里进行探讨和检验。本笔记还将概述一些关于准备有效讲座的建议。讲好课需要练习和实践。演讲不是一件仅仅因为你有高学历就能做好的事情。你不可能不经过仔细的思考、计划和练习就走进礼堂,做一场精彩的演讲。演讲既是一门科学,也是一门艺术。像其他教学方法一样,如果你想变得更熟练,它值得特别注意和练习。有效的演讲既不是简单地阅读笔记,也不是随意地背诵你一生中可能学过的知识。一位知名大学的资深教授做了一个关于教学的讲座,并指出,42年来,他从未在学校里参加过以教学质量为主题的会议。这对任何教育机构来说都是可耻的。我们不能成为好老师,如果我们不工作. . . .
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Traditional Ideas and Institutions of Democracy in India's North East Akademik Büyük Veri ve Bilimsel Bilgi Üretimi: Dergipark Örneği (Academic Big Data and Scientific Knowledge Production: The Case of Dergipark) Strategies for Governing: An Approach to Public Management Research for West and East Communication: Case Reports and Open Source Work Products in PAR An Introductory Exposure to Theories of the Policy Process for Undergraduates and Environmental Policy Students
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1