{"title":"Analysis Of Gas Production Data Via An Intelligent Model: Application Natural Gas Production","authors":"M. Ahmadi, Zhangxin Chen","doi":"10.3997/2214-4609.201803024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Predicting the future oil and gas production rate and evaluating oil/gas reserves are very challenging issues. Many engineers have found decline curve analysis a useful approach (Ahmed, 2010; Arps, 1945; Ebrahimi, 2010; Fetkovich, 1980; Gentry, 1972; Li and Horne, 2005; Ling and He, 2012; Oghena, 2012; Shirman, 1999; Zheng and Fei, 2008). The production rate \nor cumulative production at a constant bottom-hole pressure declines with time (Ahmed, 2010). Since mechanisms affecting \nthe production are constant throughout the lifetime of a reservoir, extrapolating decline curves is used to forecast the future production rate. To do so, initial production rate, the decline curvature, and its rate should be considered (Ahmed, 2010). Arps’s equations are fundamental for the most heuristic and conventional decline curve analysis models (Arps, 1945). Arps demonstrated that the hyperbolic family of equations can express mathematically the curvature behaviour of the production rate versus time curve. The Arps (Arps, 1945) equations are divided into three categories, including exponential, hyperbolic, \nand harmonic decline curve models. Fetkovich (Fetkovich, 1980) proposed type curves for analysing decline curves. The procedure of type curve matching is summarized by the visual matching with log-log paper that includes pre-plotted curves of \nproduction data. Each of the curves has characteristics which can be shown when plotting them on Cartesian, semi-log and log-log scales as shown in Figure 1.","PeriodicalId":231338,"journal":{"name":"First EAGE/PESGB Workshop Machine Learning","volume":"85 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"First EAGE/PESGB Workshop Machine Learning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3997/2214-4609.201803024","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Abstract
Predicting the future oil and gas production rate and evaluating oil/gas reserves are very challenging issues. Many engineers have found decline curve analysis a useful approach (Ahmed, 2010; Arps, 1945; Ebrahimi, 2010; Fetkovich, 1980; Gentry, 1972; Li and Horne, 2005; Ling and He, 2012; Oghena, 2012; Shirman, 1999; Zheng and Fei, 2008). The production rate
or cumulative production at a constant bottom-hole pressure declines with time (Ahmed, 2010). Since mechanisms affecting
the production are constant throughout the lifetime of a reservoir, extrapolating decline curves is used to forecast the future production rate. To do so, initial production rate, the decline curvature, and its rate should be considered (Ahmed, 2010). Arps’s equations are fundamental for the most heuristic and conventional decline curve analysis models (Arps, 1945). Arps demonstrated that the hyperbolic family of equations can express mathematically the curvature behaviour of the production rate versus time curve. The Arps (Arps, 1945) equations are divided into three categories, including exponential, hyperbolic,
and harmonic decline curve models. Fetkovich (Fetkovich, 1980) proposed type curves for analysing decline curves. The procedure of type curve matching is summarized by the visual matching with log-log paper that includes pre-plotted curves of
production data. Each of the curves has characteristics which can be shown when plotting them on Cartesian, semi-log and log-log scales as shown in Figure 1.