Evaluation methodologies of assistive technology interaction devices: a participatory mapping in Portugal based on community-based research

A. Rodrigues, Marcelo Bender Machado, A. M. Almeida, J. Abreu, T. Tavares
{"title":"Evaluation methodologies of assistive technology interaction devices: a participatory mapping in Portugal based on community-based research","authors":"A. Rodrigues, Marcelo Bender Machado, A. M. Almeida, J. Abreu, T. Tavares","doi":"10.1145/3357155.3358458","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A great challenge on Assistive Technology (AT) is the evaluation phase of the interaction devices. Generally the gap between users and devices is discovered during the use. This fact highlights the relevance to discuss this barriers early in the design process, specially, in the evaluation phase. This paper explores current practices about evaluation methodologies for Assistive Technology (AT) interaction devices for people with motor disabilities, both considering the use of computers and TV-sets. To achieve this objective the results from a systematic mapping study about AT evaluation methodology and a field research was done in Portugal with experts in Assistive Technology Evaluation and end users. This field research was done, with a semi-structured interviews and for the data analysis, a content analysis of these interviews was carried out. The findings from this research suggest that there are key dimensions that should be addressed when evaluating AT: qualification issues remain most important, especially the developers' awareness of end user needs as barrier on computer access. Other important issues are economic barriers involved in the acquisition of AT interaction devices as well as the emotional issues involved in using these devices. Finally, the paper concludes with a discussion on directions for evaluation methodologies of AT interaction devices.","PeriodicalId":237718,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 18th Brazilian Symposium on Human Factors in Computing Systems","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 18th Brazilian Symposium on Human Factors in Computing Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3357155.3358458","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

A great challenge on Assistive Technology (AT) is the evaluation phase of the interaction devices. Generally the gap between users and devices is discovered during the use. This fact highlights the relevance to discuss this barriers early in the design process, specially, in the evaluation phase. This paper explores current practices about evaluation methodologies for Assistive Technology (AT) interaction devices for people with motor disabilities, both considering the use of computers and TV-sets. To achieve this objective the results from a systematic mapping study about AT evaluation methodology and a field research was done in Portugal with experts in Assistive Technology Evaluation and end users. This field research was done, with a semi-structured interviews and for the data analysis, a content analysis of these interviews was carried out. The findings from this research suggest that there are key dimensions that should be addressed when evaluating AT: qualification issues remain most important, especially the developers' awareness of end user needs as barrier on computer access. Other important issues are economic barriers involved in the acquisition of AT interaction devices as well as the emotional issues involved in using these devices. Finally, the paper concludes with a discussion on directions for evaluation methodologies of AT interaction devices.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
辅助技术互动设备的评价方法:基于社区研究的葡萄牙参与式绘图
辅助技术(AT)面临的一大挑战是交互设备的评估阶段。一般来说,用户和设备之间的差距是在使用过程中发现的。这个事实强调了在设计过程的早期讨论这些障碍的相关性,特别是在评估阶段。本文探讨了目前对运动障碍人士辅助技术(AT)交互设备的评估方法的实践,同时考虑了电脑和电视的使用。为了实现这一目标,在葡萄牙与辅助技术评估专家和最终用户一起进行了关于辅助技术评估方法的系统测绘研究和实地研究的结果。本研究采用半结构化访谈进行实地调查,并对访谈内容进行分析,以进行数据分析。这项研究的结果表明,在评估AT时,有几个关键的方面应该加以解决:资格问题仍然是最重要的,特别是开发人员对终端用户需求作为计算机访问障碍的认识。其他重要的问题是涉及到获取AT交互设备的经济障碍,以及涉及到使用这些设备的情感问题。最后,对AT交互装置评价方法的发展方向进行了讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Art accessibility for blind people: a process to create and understand photography CargoAffect Creating chatbots to talk with humans: HCI evaluations and perspectives Scope and definition of user experience in Brazil: a survey to explore community's perspectives Open design: a systematic mapping
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1