{"title":"Xerox CO/sub 2/ cleaning system pilot","authors":"C.M. Genca","doi":"10.1109/ISEE.1995.514958","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The carbon dioxide (CO/sub 2/) Cleaning System was adapted by Xerox from a jet-engine cleaning technology and is being used for removal of grease,dirt, and oil from used (field-returned) equipment to enable machine remanufacturing. Prior to the introduction of CO/sub 2/ blasting at Xerox, machine cleaning was a two-stage process, which required a variety of chemicals. In the first stage, loose dirt was removed by compressed air blow-off and vacuum suction. In the second stage, a blend of chlorinated solvents was applied, typically in a handwipe application. In the 1980s, Xerox replaced the solvent blend with a citrus-based material for general cleaning but continued to use 1,1,1-trichloroethane on encrusted, stubborn dirt. Xerox made a significant financial investment in adapting CO/sub 2/ blasting technology for use in its remanufacturing facility and the cleaning of mechanically and electronically sensitive machine parts. This development effort entailed redesign of the current process equipment and recalibration of the blasting parameters. Furthermore, ergonomic refinement of the equipment was required to permit its use by an operator over an 8 to 12 hour work shift. Development and implementation of this new system allowed Xerox to meet an internal requirement of eliminating all ozone depleting substances from its manufacturing processes by the end of 1992, years ahead of any regulatory initiatives. Moreover, CO/sub 2/ blast cleaning resulted in unanticipated cost-savings of 40% and productivity improvements of 50%.","PeriodicalId":338075,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 1995 IEEE International Symposium on Electronics and the Environment ISEE (Cat. No.95CH35718)","volume":"102 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1995-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 1995 IEEE International Symposium on Electronics and the Environment ISEE (Cat. No.95CH35718)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISEE.1995.514958","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
The carbon dioxide (CO/sub 2/) Cleaning System was adapted by Xerox from a jet-engine cleaning technology and is being used for removal of grease,dirt, and oil from used (field-returned) equipment to enable machine remanufacturing. Prior to the introduction of CO/sub 2/ blasting at Xerox, machine cleaning was a two-stage process, which required a variety of chemicals. In the first stage, loose dirt was removed by compressed air blow-off and vacuum suction. In the second stage, a blend of chlorinated solvents was applied, typically in a handwipe application. In the 1980s, Xerox replaced the solvent blend with a citrus-based material for general cleaning but continued to use 1,1,1-trichloroethane on encrusted, stubborn dirt. Xerox made a significant financial investment in adapting CO/sub 2/ blasting technology for use in its remanufacturing facility and the cleaning of mechanically and electronically sensitive machine parts. This development effort entailed redesign of the current process equipment and recalibration of the blasting parameters. Furthermore, ergonomic refinement of the equipment was required to permit its use by an operator over an 8 to 12 hour work shift. Development and implementation of this new system allowed Xerox to meet an internal requirement of eliminating all ozone depleting substances from its manufacturing processes by the end of 1992, years ahead of any regulatory initiatives. Moreover, CO/sub 2/ blast cleaning resulted in unanticipated cost-savings of 40% and productivity improvements of 50%.