Does EU Law Recognize Legal Limits to European Integration? Accommodating Diversity and its Limits

L. Besselink
{"title":"Does EU Law Recognize Legal Limits to European Integration? Accommodating Diversity and its Limits","authors":"L. Besselink","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.2343751","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"One of the starting points of the integration of legal and constitutional orders in the European Union is that it requires unity of action. In the abstract, it is easy to answer the question whether unity of action entails the necessity of uniformity either in approach or in result, negatively. The obvious alternative to uniformity would be the accommodation of diversity. But does EU law recognize diversity as a matter of law? If so, to what extent? Does this diversity also function as a limit to integration?These are the questions which I address in this essay. The four parameters of it are therefore ‘unity of action’, ‘uniformity’, ‘accommodation of diversity’ and ‘limits to integration’. The focus is mainly the relation between these four notions. They ‘frame’ the questions and although it also provides some answers to the concrete questions, its foremost aim is to make the case for the accommodation of legitimate diversity, indicating the limits of such accommodation. In doing so, the paper outlines forms and some of the techniques of such accommodation.","PeriodicalId":112419,"journal":{"name":"LSN: International Governmental Organizations (Topic)","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"LSN: International Governmental Organizations (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2343751","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

One of the starting points of the integration of legal and constitutional orders in the European Union is that it requires unity of action. In the abstract, it is easy to answer the question whether unity of action entails the necessity of uniformity either in approach or in result, negatively. The obvious alternative to uniformity would be the accommodation of diversity. But does EU law recognize diversity as a matter of law? If so, to what extent? Does this diversity also function as a limit to integration?These are the questions which I address in this essay. The four parameters of it are therefore ‘unity of action’, ‘uniformity’, ‘accommodation of diversity’ and ‘limits to integration’. The focus is mainly the relation between these four notions. They ‘frame’ the questions and although it also provides some answers to the concrete questions, its foremost aim is to make the case for the accommodation of legitimate diversity, indicating the limits of such accommodation. In doing so, the paper outlines forms and some of the techniques of such accommodation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
欧盟法律承认欧洲一体化的法律限制吗?适应多样性及其局限性
欧盟法律和宪法秩序一体化的出发点之一是,它需要统一行动。抽象地说,我们很容易否定地回答行动的统一性是否必然导致方法或结果的统一性的问题。明显的替代统一的办法是适应多样性。但欧盟法律承认多样性是法律问题吗?如果是,到什么程度?这种多样性是否也会限制整合?这些就是我在这篇文章中要讨论的问题。因此,它的四个参数是“行动统一”、“统一性”、“适应多样性”和“限制一体化”。重点是这四个概念之间的关系。它们“框定”了问题,尽管它也为具体问题提供了一些答案,但它的首要目的是为容纳合法的多样性提供理由,并指出这种容纳的局限性。在此过程中,本文概述了这种调节的形式和一些技巧。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
From the Rule of Law to the Rule of Code? Predictive Data Analytics and the Changing Contours of UN Humanitarian Response A Legal Analysis of the Strategies Adopted by the International Seabed Authority for the Management of the Area Clash of Trade and National Public Interest in WTO Law: The Illusion of ‘Weighing and Balancing’ and the Theory of Reservation The Myth of U.N. Collective Security The North Korea’s Gauntlet, International Law and the New Sanctions Imposed by the Security Council
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1