TEACHING STATISTICS USING TEAM-BASED POLLING

C. Kaur, M. Raghavan
{"title":"TEACHING STATISTICS USING TEAM-BASED POLLING","authors":"C. Kaur, M. Raghavan","doi":"10.21125/EDULEARN.2019.0950","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Over the last two decades, Australian universities have seen a large increase in the number of international student enrolments. This growth has exacerbated the problem surrounding student engagement and performance, given that students in large classes are reluctant to participate in answering questions. In-class passivity of international student cohorts stemming from language and cultural factors coupled with heterogeneity in statistical abilities set the scene for this case study. In order to encourage student participation in a large, culturally diverse cohort with varying statistical abilities, we propose a collaborative approach. We combine two pedagogical methods, namely team based learning (TBL) and personal response system (PRS) in an effort to enhance peer collaboration. We implemented these methods in multiple tutorials for students enrolled in a Business Statistics unit in an Australian university. We employed a case study with a mixed methods study design to assess the students’ learning experience and performance following the implementation of the collaborative approach. Both quantitative and qualitative data are collected across two semesters. We collected data from student surveys and group discussions as well as marks obtained from questions delivered in team-based polling through PRS. Overall, the results from a large sample data indicate that the use of team-based polling within small group settings has had a positive impact on student learning. The data suggests that a collaborative approach improves students’ understanding of key statistical concepts. The students acknowledged that through group work, they are able to learn from their peers, especially when all members within the group contribute to the discussion. The analysis of the data collected through the polling system further shows an improved student results and better understanding of the subject matter when questions are answered collectively compared as compared to those answered individually.","PeriodicalId":414865,"journal":{"name":"EDULEARN19 Proceedings","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EDULEARN19 Proceedings","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21125/EDULEARN.2019.0950","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Over the last two decades, Australian universities have seen a large increase in the number of international student enrolments. This growth has exacerbated the problem surrounding student engagement and performance, given that students in large classes are reluctant to participate in answering questions. In-class passivity of international student cohorts stemming from language and cultural factors coupled with heterogeneity in statistical abilities set the scene for this case study. In order to encourage student participation in a large, culturally diverse cohort with varying statistical abilities, we propose a collaborative approach. We combine two pedagogical methods, namely team based learning (TBL) and personal response system (PRS) in an effort to enhance peer collaboration. We implemented these methods in multiple tutorials for students enrolled in a Business Statistics unit in an Australian university. We employed a case study with a mixed methods study design to assess the students’ learning experience and performance following the implementation of the collaborative approach. Both quantitative and qualitative data are collected across two semesters. We collected data from student surveys and group discussions as well as marks obtained from questions delivered in team-based polling through PRS. Overall, the results from a large sample data indicate that the use of team-based polling within small group settings has had a positive impact on student learning. The data suggests that a collaborative approach improves students’ understanding of key statistical concepts. The students acknowledged that through group work, they are able to learn from their peers, especially when all members within the group contribute to the discussion. The analysis of the data collected through the polling system further shows an improved student results and better understanding of the subject matter when questions are answered collectively compared as compared to those answered individually.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用基于团队的投票来教授统计学
在过去的二十年里,澳大利亚大学的国际学生入学人数大幅增加。这种增长加剧了学生参与和表现方面的问题,因为大班的学生不愿意参与回答问题。由于语言和文化因素以及统计能力的异质性,国际学生群体在课堂上的被动性为本案例研究奠定了基础。为了鼓励学生参与一个庞大的、文化多样化的、具有不同统计能力的群体,我们提出了一种合作的方法。我们结合两种教学方法,即团队学习(TBL)和个人回应系统(PRS),以加强同侪合作。我们在多个教程中为澳大利亚一所大学的商业统计单元的学生实现了这些方法。我们采用了一个案例研究,采用混合方法研究设计来评估学生在实施协作方法后的学习体验和表现。定量和定性数据都是在两个学期中收集的。我们从学生调查和小组讨论中收集数据,以及通过PRS以团队为基础的投票从问题中获得的分数。总体而言,来自大样本数据的结果表明,在小组设置中使用基于团队的投票对学生的学习产生了积极的影响。数据表明,协作方法提高了学生对关键统计概念的理解。学生们承认,通过小组作业,他们能够向同龄人学习,特别是当小组中的所有成员都参与讨论时。对通过投票系统收集的数据的分析进一步表明,与单独回答问题相比,集体回答问题可以提高学生的成绩,并更好地理解主题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
ACADEMIC MOTIVATION OF PUPILS IN REGULAR AND WALDORF SCHOOLS WE CAN DO IT: MASS TRAINING UNDERGRADUATES IN LEARNING MANAGEMENT SYSTEM USAGE RANKING THE BALANCED SCORECARD GOALS OF HIGHER EDUCATION INSTITUTIONS USING THE CENTRALITY MEASURES COORDINATION PROBLEMS IN ENGINEERING DEGREES DIMENSIONS OF INTERPERSONAL TEACHERS’ SKILLS IN SCHOOL ENVIRONMENT
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1