Comparative Study on Vehicle Dynamics Behavior Using different Types of Controllers in Intersection Management Systems

Mostafa K. Ghaith, Mohamed M. Rehaan, N. Shouman, Y. Abdalla, Omar M. Shehata
{"title":"Comparative Study on Vehicle Dynamics Behavior Using different Types of Controllers in Intersection Management Systems","authors":"Mostafa K. Ghaith, Mohamed M. Rehaan, N. Shouman, Y. Abdalla, Omar M. Shehata","doi":"10.1109/ICMRE54455.2022.9734079","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Autonomous Intersection Management (AIM) controllers develop a distributed cooperative control logic to determine conflict-free trajectories for Connected Autonomous Vehicles (CAVs) in signal-free intersections. The work in this paper aims to allow AIM systems to work within narrow margins of error resulting in increased traffic throughput and reducing traffic congestion. The cooperative trajectory planning problem is formulated as vehicle-level mixed-integer non-linear programs that aim to minimize travel time of each vehicle and their speed variations while avoiding near-crash conditions. This paper implements and tests various dynamic velocity control strategies for vehicles within an intersection. Moreover, Model Predictive Controller (MPC), Fuzzy Logic and Proportional-Integral-Differential (PID) controllers were used and compared in terms of controller effort and velocity tracking. A Comparison is formulated based on different control parameters i.e., time response characteristics and control effort. The simulations have been implemented using unreal engine and RoadRunner. The simulation results have shown an acceptable performance for all controllers under test with varying features that has been discussed throughout this study.","PeriodicalId":419108,"journal":{"name":"2022 8th International Conference on Mechatronics and Robotics Engineering (ICMRE)","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 8th International Conference on Mechatronics and Robotics Engineering (ICMRE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICMRE54455.2022.9734079","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Autonomous Intersection Management (AIM) controllers develop a distributed cooperative control logic to determine conflict-free trajectories for Connected Autonomous Vehicles (CAVs) in signal-free intersections. The work in this paper aims to allow AIM systems to work within narrow margins of error resulting in increased traffic throughput and reducing traffic congestion. The cooperative trajectory planning problem is formulated as vehicle-level mixed-integer non-linear programs that aim to minimize travel time of each vehicle and their speed variations while avoiding near-crash conditions. This paper implements and tests various dynamic velocity control strategies for vehicles within an intersection. Moreover, Model Predictive Controller (MPC), Fuzzy Logic and Proportional-Integral-Differential (PID) controllers were used and compared in terms of controller effort and velocity tracking. A Comparison is formulated based on different control parameters i.e., time response characteristics and control effort. The simulations have been implemented using unreal engine and RoadRunner. The simulation results have shown an acceptable performance for all controllers under test with varying features that has been discussed throughout this study.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
交叉口管理系统中不同类型控制器对车辆动力学行为的比较研究
自主交叉口管理(AIM)控制器开发了一种分布式协同控制逻辑,以确定无信号交叉口中联网自动驾驶汽车(CAVs)的无冲突轨迹。本文的工作旨在使AIM系统在较小的误差范围内工作,从而增加交通吞吐量并减少交通拥堵。将协同轨迹规划问题表述为车辆级混合整数非线性规划,其目标是最小化每辆车的行驶时间和速度变化,同时避免接近碰撞的情况。本文对交叉口内车辆的各种动态速度控制策略进行了实现和测试。此外,模型预测控制器(MPC)、模糊逻辑和比例-积分-微分(PID)控制器在控制器的工作量和速度跟踪方面进行了比较。根据不同的控制参数,即时间响应特性和控制努力,进行了比较。仿真使用虚幻引擎和RoadRunner实现。仿真结果表明,在整个研究中讨论的具有不同特征的测试中,所有控制器都具有可接受的性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Open-Source Educational Platform for FPGA Accelerated AI in Robotics Learning Fruit Class from Short Wave Near Infrared Spectral Features, an AI Approach Towards Determining Fruit Type Design of Haptic Vibrational Feedback Control in Upper Extremity Myoelectric Prostheses Feature-Based Lane Detection Algorithms for Track Following: A Comparative Study Deep Belief Network-based Prediction for Gear Noise
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1