Foreign Direct Investment and the Dark Side of Decentralization

Sebastian G. Kessing, Kai A. Konrad, Christos Kotsogiannis
{"title":"Foreign Direct Investment and the Dark Side of Decentralization","authors":"Sebastian G. Kessing, Kai A. Konrad, Christos Kotsogiannis","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-0327.2007.00172.x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\"Both in the developed and developing world, decentralization of fiscal policy is frequently argued to foster investment, because allowing investors to choose between competing locations should make it difficult for each jurisdiction to tax the investment's returns. We point out that this 'horizontal' dimension of decentralization cannot eliminate ex post incentives to tax investments once they are irreversibly located in a jurisdiction, and that the negative ex ante investment effects of such 'hold up' problems are actually stronger when decentralization inevitably leads to multiple levels of taxation power in each location. Empirically, we detect significant negative effects on FDI of the 'vertical' dimension of decentralization, measured by the number of government layers, in a data set containing many countries and many suitable control variables. Indicators of overall fiscal decentralization do not appear to affect the investment climate negatively per se, but our theoretical arguments and empirical results suggest that policymakers should consider very carefully the form and degree of government decentralization if they aim at improving the investment climate.\" Copyright (c) CEPR, CES, MSH, 2007.","PeriodicalId":236508,"journal":{"name":"Wiley-Blackwell: Economic Policy","volume":"170 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"62","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wiley-Blackwell: Economic Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0327.2007.00172.x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 62

Abstract

"Both in the developed and developing world, decentralization of fiscal policy is frequently argued to foster investment, because allowing investors to choose between competing locations should make it difficult for each jurisdiction to tax the investment's returns. We point out that this 'horizontal' dimension of decentralization cannot eliminate ex post incentives to tax investments once they are irreversibly located in a jurisdiction, and that the negative ex ante investment effects of such 'hold up' problems are actually stronger when decentralization inevitably leads to multiple levels of taxation power in each location. Empirically, we detect significant negative effects on FDI of the 'vertical' dimension of decentralization, measured by the number of government layers, in a data set containing many countries and many suitable control variables. Indicators of overall fiscal decentralization do not appear to affect the investment climate negatively per se, but our theoretical arguments and empirical results suggest that policymakers should consider very carefully the form and degree of government decentralization if they aim at improving the investment climate." Copyright (c) CEPR, CES, MSH, 2007.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
外商直接投资与分权的阴暗面
“无论是在发达国家还是发展中国家,财政政策的分散化经常被认为是为了促进投资,因为允许投资者在相互竞争的地点之间进行选择,应该会使每个司法管辖区难以对投资回报征税。我们指出,一旦税收投资不可逆转地位于一个司法管辖区,这种分散化的“横向”维度并不能消除对税收投资的事后激励,而且当分散化不可避免地导致每个地方的多层次税收权力时,这种“阻碍”问题的负面事前投资效应实际上会更强。从经验上看,我们在包含许多国家和许多适当控制变量的数据集中,通过政府层数来衡量分权的“垂直”维度,发现了对外国直接投资的显著负面影响。总体财政分权的指标本身似乎不会对投资环境产生负面影响,但我们的理论论点和实证结果表明,如果政策制定者旨在改善投资环境,他们应该非常仔细地考虑政府分权的形式和程度。”版权所有(c) CEPR, CES, MSH, 2007
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Unemployment at Risk: The Policy Determinants of Labour Market Exposure to Economic Shocks School and Family Effects on Educational Outcomes Across Countries Evaluating the Cost of Government Credit Support: The OECD Context Public Policy and Resource Allocation: Evidence from Firms in OECD Countries Defying Gravity: Can Japanese Sovereign Debt Continue to Increase Without a Crisis?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1