The influence of feature selection methods on exercise classification with inertial measurement units

M. O'Reilly, W. Johnston, Cillian Buckley, D. Whelan, B. Caulfield
{"title":"The influence of feature selection methods on exercise classification with inertial measurement units","authors":"M. O'Reilly, W. Johnston, Cillian Buckley, D. Whelan, B. Caulfield","doi":"10.1109/BSN.2017.7936039","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Inertial measurement unit (IMU) based systems are becoming increasingly popular in the classification of human movement. While research in the area has established the utility of various machine learning classification methods, there is a paucity of evidence investigating the effect of feature selection on classification efficacy. The aim of this study was therefore to investigate the influence of feature selection methodology on the classification accuracy of human movement data. The efficacy of four commonly used feature selection and classification methods were compared using four IMU human movement data sets. Optimisation of classification and features selection methodologies resulted in an overall improvement in F1 score of between 1–8% for all four data sets. The findings from this study illustrate the need for researchers to consider the effect classification and feature selection methodologies may have on system efficacy.","PeriodicalId":249670,"journal":{"name":"2017 IEEE 14th International Conference on Wearable and Implantable Body Sensor Networks (BSN)","volume":"41 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 IEEE 14th International Conference on Wearable and Implantable Body Sensor Networks (BSN)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/BSN.2017.7936039","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

Inertial measurement unit (IMU) based systems are becoming increasingly popular in the classification of human movement. While research in the area has established the utility of various machine learning classification methods, there is a paucity of evidence investigating the effect of feature selection on classification efficacy. The aim of this study was therefore to investigate the influence of feature selection methodology on the classification accuracy of human movement data. The efficacy of four commonly used feature selection and classification methods were compared using four IMU human movement data sets. Optimisation of classification and features selection methodologies resulted in an overall improvement in F1 score of between 1–8% for all four data sets. The findings from this study illustrate the need for researchers to consider the effect classification and feature selection methodologies may have on system efficacy.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
特征选择方法对惯性测量单元运动分类的影响
基于惯性测量单元(IMU)的系统在人体运动分类中越来越受欢迎。虽然该领域的研究已经建立了各种机器学习分类方法的效用,但研究特征选择对分类效果的影响的证据却很缺乏。因此,本研究的目的是探讨特征选择方法对人体运动数据分类精度的影响。利用4个IMU人体运动数据集,比较了4种常用的特征选择和分类方法的有效性。分类和特征选择方法的优化导致所有四个数据集的F1分数在1-8%之间的总体改进。本研究的结果表明,研究人员需要考虑分类和特征选择方法可能对系统效能产生的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Radiowave propagation characteristics of the intra-body channel at 2.38 GHz Smart-shoe self-powered by walking A personalized air quality sensing system - a preliminary study on assessing the air quality of London underground stations Unsupervised deep representation learning to remove motion artifacts in free-mode body sensor networks Quantifying postural instability in Parkinsonian gait from inertial sensor data during standardised clinical gait tests
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1