Effects of Antecedent-Based Intervention in Ecological Assessment Process on the Challenging Behaviors of Students with Intellectual Disabilities during Art Class
{"title":"Effects of Antecedent-Based Intervention in Ecological Assessment Process on the Challenging Behaviors of Students with Intellectual Disabilities during Art Class","authors":"Sun-ok Kim, 채수정","doi":"10.22874/kaba.2018.5.2.127","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nThe purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of antecedent-based intervention in the ecological assessment process on the maladaptive behaviors of students with intellectual disabilities. The participants were second-grade middle school students with intellectual disabilities who are enrolled in a special school. The subjects' personal, environmental, and teacher-related factors were analyzed using ecological assessment- direct observation, reviews of existing records, interviews, questionnaires, and functional analysis. The antecedent-based intervention was developed based on the results of ecological assessment. There were three types of challenging behaviors: seat breakaway, noise generation, and task interruption. These behaviors were observed and recorded using the partial interval recording method(20-second intervals comprising 17-second observations with 3-second recordings). Multiple-baseline research design, a type of single-subject design, was employed across three participants for baseline, intervention, and maintenance phases. The data were analyzed using six visual analysis methods: level of data, trend, distribution of data, immediacy effect, percentage of non-overlapping data, and persistence of data. These methods were recently suggested by What Works Clearinghouse (Kratochwill et al., 2013) as quality indicators for single-subject research designs. The results showed that antecedent-based intervention in the ecological assessment process significantly decreased the challenging behaviors of students with intellectual disabilities during art class through a comparison of the intervention interval. The mean value of challenging behaviors was significantly less in all subjects, the percentage of non-overlapping data (PND) value was 100%, and Tau-U value was -1.00, indicating that the effects of the intervention were significant. Compared to the baseline value, the PND value between the baseline and maintenance was 100%, indicating that the intervention effects were significantly consistent. These analyses were discussed in terms of educational implications to apply in special education practices.\n","PeriodicalId":132513,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Behavior Analysis and Support","volume":"55 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Behavior Analysis and Support","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22874/kaba.2018.5.2.127","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of antecedent-based intervention in the ecological assessment process on the maladaptive behaviors of students with intellectual disabilities. The participants were second-grade middle school students with intellectual disabilities who are enrolled in a special school. The subjects' personal, environmental, and teacher-related factors were analyzed using ecological assessment- direct observation, reviews of existing records, interviews, questionnaires, and functional analysis. The antecedent-based intervention was developed based on the results of ecological assessment. There were three types of challenging behaviors: seat breakaway, noise generation, and task interruption. These behaviors were observed and recorded using the partial interval recording method(20-second intervals comprising 17-second observations with 3-second recordings). Multiple-baseline research design, a type of single-subject design, was employed across three participants for baseline, intervention, and maintenance phases. The data were analyzed using six visual analysis methods: level of data, trend, distribution of data, immediacy effect, percentage of non-overlapping data, and persistence of data. These methods were recently suggested by What Works Clearinghouse (Kratochwill et al., 2013) as quality indicators for single-subject research designs. The results showed that antecedent-based intervention in the ecological assessment process significantly decreased the challenging behaviors of students with intellectual disabilities during art class through a comparison of the intervention interval. The mean value of challenging behaviors was significantly less in all subjects, the percentage of non-overlapping data (PND) value was 100%, and Tau-U value was -1.00, indicating that the effects of the intervention were significant. Compared to the baseline value, the PND value between the baseline and maintenance was 100%, indicating that the intervention effects were significantly consistent. These analyses were discussed in terms of educational implications to apply in special education practices.
摘要本研究旨在探讨在生态评估过程中,前因干预对智障学生适应不良行为的影响。参与者是在特殊学校就读的智障中学生二年级。采用生态评价方法——直接观察、回顾现有记录、访谈、问卷调查和功能分析,分析受试者的个人、环境和教师相关因素。基于前因的干预是在生态评价结果的基础上制定的。有三种具有挑战性的行为:离开座位、产生噪音和中断任务。这些行为的观察和记录采用部分间隔记录法(20秒间隔,包括17秒观察和3秒记录)。多基线研究设计是一种单受试者设计,在基线、干预和维持阶段采用三名参与者。使用六种可视化分析方法对数据进行分析:数据水平、趋势、数据分布、即时性效应、非重叠数据百分比和数据持久性。这些方法最近由What Works Clearinghouse (Kratochwill et al., 2013)提出,作为单受试者研究设计的质量指标。结果表明,通过干预间隔的比较,在生态评价过程中,基于前因的干预显著降低了智障学生在艺术课上的挑战行为。所有被试的挑战性行为均值均显著降低,非重叠数据百分比(PND)值为100%,Tau-U值为-1.00,表明干预效果显著。与基线值相比,基线与维持之间的PND值为100%,表明干预效果显著一致。从教育意义的角度探讨了这些分析在特殊教育实践中的应用。